Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Rule: Methods of Withdrawing Funds From Thrift Savings Plan
The rule was issued by
DATES: This rule is effective without further action on
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments using one of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail:
* Facsimile: Comments may be submitted by facsimile at (202) 942-1676.
Since
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
* * *
The
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FRTIB administers the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), which was established by the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA), Public Law 99-335, 100 Stat. 514. The TSP provisions of
Post-Separation Withdrawals
TSP participants who have separated from service have three basic methods of withdrawing money from their TSP accounts: (1) Installment payments; (2) single withdrawals; and (3) annuity purchases. A separated participant who elects to receive all or a portion of his or her account balance in the form of installment payments must choose the frequency of those payments (monthly, quarterly, or annual) and whether to receive fixed dollar payments or payments calculated based on life expectancy.
Restrictions on Life-Expectancy-Based Installment Payments
Currently, a separated TSP participant may change the amount and frequency of his or her fixed dollar installment payments at any time throughout the year. This includes the ability of a participant to make a one-time election to change from installment payments calculated based on life expectancy to fixed dollar installment payments. However, under existing rules, once a participant makes an election to receive fixed dollar installment payments, he or she may not switch to life-expectancy-based installment payments. In addition, although a TSP participant receiving installment payments may stop these payments at any time, if he or she stops life-expectancy-based installment payments, the participant may not elect to restart life-expectancy-based installment payments at a later date.
Need for Removal of Restrictions
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a steep and sudden decline in the stock markets and put a severe strain on many household budgets. In order to give time for TSP account balances to recover, as authorized by the CARES Act, the TSP will not send any automatic RMD payments for 2020. However, the TSP will continue to send elected installment payments in 2020 unless the participant makes an affirmative election to stop installment payments.
Many separated TSP participants who are required to receive RMDs elect to receive life-expectancy-based installment payments as a way to ensure they satisfy this requirement. The existing restrictions on life-expectancy-based installment payments put these participants in an untenable situation--they must either continue to receive payments and forego the chance to let their account balances recover, or stop their payments and forego the ability to restart life-expectancy-based payments in the future. Moreover, over the years, separated participants of all ages have expressed a desire for more flexibility to change between fixed dollar and life-expectancy-based installment payments. Therefore, effective
The removal of these restrictions allows TSP participants who are eligible for installment payments to elect to receive payments based on life expectancy whether or not they previously started and then stopped installment payments. In order for a TSP participant who is currently receiving fixed dollar installment payments to receive installment payments calculated based on life expectancy, the participant must first stop his or her existing installment payments. The participant can then make a new withdrawal election to receive life-expectancy-based installment payments. (Participants who are currently receiving payments based on life expectancy will continue to have the ability to switch to fixed dollar payments simply by requesting a Start Printed Page 76420specific dollar amount.) This new withdrawal election is subject to the spousal consent rules set forth at 5 U.S.C. 8435(a)(1)(B).
Tax Implications
The FRTIB recognizes the value of giving TSP participants more flexibility with respect to installment payments. However, TSP participants should be aware of potential tax consequences mandated by the Internal Revenue Code (Code) that may result from stopping installment payments calculated based on life expectancy.
TSP participants who separate from service before the age of 55 and choose to receive installment payments may be subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty under Code section 72(t). Installment payments based on life expectancy are an exception to the rule. However, the penalty can be applied retroactively if the participant does any of the following within five years of beginning payments or before reaching age 591/2: (1) Stopping life-expectancy-based payments; (2) switching life-expectancy-based payments to payments of a fixed dollar amount; or (3) withdrawing money in addition to the life-expectancy based payments. Doing any of these things in that period of time will make the participant liable for the penalty tax on the payments he or she previously received. These tax consequences are mandated by the Code and are not eliminated by this FRTIB rule change.
Direct Final Rulemaking
The FRTIB is publishing this regulation as a direct final rule. In a direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes its rule in the
The content of this direct final rule relieves a restriction on a TSP participant's ability to make a post-separation withdrawal election to receive installment payments based on life expectancy. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, notice and comment are not required, and this rule may become effective after publication in the
Nevertheless, the FRTIB appreciates that members of the public may have perspectives or information that could impact the FRTIB's views with respect to the removal of these restrictions. The FRTIB, therefore, is providing a 30-day public comment period, and intends to consider all comments submitted during that period. The FRTIB will withdraw the rule if it receives significant adverse comment. Comments that are not adverse may be considered for modifications to part 1650 at a future date. If no significant adverse comment is received, the rule will become effective 40 days after publication, without additional notice.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This regulation will affect Federal employees and members of the uniformed services who participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, which is a Federal defined contribution retirement savings plan created under the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA), Public Law 99-335, 100 Stat. 514, and which is administered by the FRTIB.
Paperwork Reduction Act
I certify that these regulations do not require additional reporting under the criteria of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 602, 632, 653, 1501-1571, the effects of this regulation on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector have been assessed. This regulation will not compel the expenditure in any one year of
Submission to
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 810(a)(1)(A), the FRTIB submitted a report containing this rule and other required information to the
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1650
* Alimony
* Claims
* Government employees
* Pensions
* Retirement
Executive Director,
The document is published in the
TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact


Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Rule: Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Sunflower Seed Crop Insurance Provisions, Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions
HHS Rule: Creation of New Safe Harbor Protection for Certain Point-of-Sale Reductions in Price on Prescription Pharmaceuticals, Certain Pharmacy Benefit Manager Service Fees
Advisor News
- Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
- How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Has your annuity been reinsured in the Cayman Islands? Here’s why it matters
- DOL slams pension risk transfer lawsuit as ‘opportunistic’ litigation
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Covered California health insurance premiums for San Joaquin Valley enrollees will rise by about 11% or more in 2027
- Pennsylvania ACA health insurers propose double-digit premium increases for 2027
- NEW DATA: SCOTT PERRY-BACKED HEALTHCARE CUTS CAUSE MORE THAN 12,400 CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIANS TO DROP INSURANCE COVERAGE
- CBO: OVER 10 PERCENT OF U.S. POPULATION WILL BE UNINSURED DUE TO THE REPUBLICAN BIG, UGLY BETRAYAL LAW
- ALSOBROOKS, BARRAGAN INTRODUCE THREE BILLS TO CLOSE GAPS IN DENTAL COVERAGE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Globe Life boosts Q2 earnings, eyes AI shift for long-term growth
- ATTORNEY GENERAL BRENNA BIRD LEADS FIGHT TO PROTECT IOWA PENSIONS
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Bao Viet Insurance Corporation
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
More Life Insurance News