ENSIGN GROUP, INC – 10-Q – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Interim Financial Statements and accompanying notes, which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Quarterly Report and in our other reports filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 (Annual Report), which discusses our business and related risks in greater detail, as well as subsequent reports we may file from time to time on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, for additional information. The section entitled "Risk Factors" contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and similar discussions in our otherSEC filings, also describe some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with theSEC , before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which include, but are not limited to our expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financing plans, business strategy, budgets, capital expenditures, competitive positions, growth opportunities, and plans and objectives of management. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," "would," "could," "potential," "continue," "ongoing," similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Additionally, our business and operations for 2023 continue to be impacted by changes of the COVID-19 environment. Because of the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we are unable to predict the full extent and duration of the financial impact of these changes on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of which are listed under the section "Risk Factors" contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and business, management's beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason, except as otherwise required by law. As used in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the words, "Ensign," "Company," "we," "our" and "us" refer toThe Ensign Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All of our affiliated operations, the Service Center, our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary and our captive real estate investment trust (REIT) calledStandard Bearer Healthcare REIT, Inc. (Standard Bearer) are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets. The use of "Ensign," "Company," "we," "us," "our" and similar verbiage in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not meant to imply that any of our affiliated operations, the Service Center, the captive insurance subsidiary or Standard Bearer are operated by the same entity. This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our Interim Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Overview
We are a provider of health care services across the post-acute care continuum and engage in the operation, ownership, acquisition, development and leasing of skilled nursing, senior living and other healthcare related properties and other ancillary businesses located inArizona ,California ,Colorado ,Idaho ,Iowa ,Kansas ,Nebraska ,Nevada ,South Carolina ,Texas ,Utah ,Washington andWisconsin . Our operating subsidiaries, each of which strives to be the operation of choice in the community it serves, provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing, senior living and other ancillary services. As ofMarch 31, 2023 , we offered skilled nursing, senior living and rehabilitative care services through 290 skilled nursing and senior living facilities. Of the 290 facilities, we operated 211 facilities under long-term lease arrangements and have options to purchase 11 of those facilities. Our real estate portfolio includes 108 owned real estate properties, which included 79 facilities operated and managed by us, 29 senior living operations leased to and operated byThe Pennant Group, Inc. , or Pennant, as part of the spin-off transaction that occurred inOctober 2019 , and the Service Center location. Of the 29 real estate operations leased to Pennant, one senior living operation is located on the same real estate property as a skilled nursing facility that we own and operate. The following table summarizes our affiliated facilities and operational skilled nursing beds and senior living units by ownership status as ofMarch 31, 2023 : Leased (without Total for Owned and Leased (with a a Purchase Facilities Operated Purchase Option) Option) Operated Number of facilities 79 11 200 290 Percentage of total 27.2 % 3.8 % 69.0 % 100.0 % Operational skilled nursing beds 7,833 1,145 20,937 29,915 Percentage of total 26.2 % 3.8 % 70.0 % 100.0 % Senior living units 1,705 178 1,144 3,027 Percentage of total 56.3 % 5.9 % 37.8 % 100.0 % Ensign is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenues. Our operating subsidiaries are operated by separate, independent entities, each of which has its own management, employees and assets. In addition, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, referred to collectively as the Service Center, provide centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other centralized services to the other operating subsidiaries through contractual relationships with such subsidiaries. We also have a wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary that provides some claims-made coverage to our operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as coverage for certain workers' compensation insurance liabilities and our captive real estate trust owns and operates our real estate portfolio. Our captive real estate investment trust, Standard Bearer, owns and manages our real estate business. References herein to the consolidated "Company" and "its" assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms "we," "us," "our" and similar terms in this Quarterly Report, are not meant to imply, nor should they be construed as meaning, thatThe Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the subsidiaries are operated byThe Ensign Group .
Recent Activities
Operational Update - OnJanuary 30, 2023 , theBiden-Harris Administration announced its plan to extend the public health emergency (PHE) for a final time toMay 11, 2023 . Our primary focus has always been and continues to be the health and safety of our patients, residents, employees and their respective families. Even with the anticipated end of the PHE, we continue to implement new measures and maintain existing ones to provide the safest possible environment within our sites of service, taking into consideration the vulnerable nature of our patients and the unique exposure risks of our staff. We continue to execute on key initiatives to rebuild occupancy lost due to the pandemic. Our combined Same Facilities and Transitioning Facilities occupancy is 78.5%, which represents a 4.3% increase compared to the prior year quarter, and is closer to our pre-pandemic occupancy levels, which was at 80.1% inMarch 2020 . The innovative approaches and strategic partnerships developed during the pandemic have supported our occupancy improvements and continue to enable us to gain additional market share. These key initiatives together with our dedication to operational fundamentals resulted in a strong first quarter. 32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We receive state relief funding from various states, including healthcare relief funding under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), increases in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and other state specific relief programs. We use this funding to reimburse the recipient for healthcare and labor related expenses that are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic or are associated with providing patient care. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (CAA 2023) and the end of the PHE will result in the gradual phase down of the temporary increase in FMAP funding. During the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , the temporary increase to FMAP remained unchanged at 6.2%. It is expected that the increase will decline to 5% in the second quarter, 2.5% in the third quarter and 1.5% in the fourth quarter. Additionally, in some states, we will continue to receive state relief funding through the ARPA and other state relief programs through the end of 2023.
During the three months ended
million
revenue.
Facility Information The following table sets forth the location of our operated and owned facilities by type as well as the number of beds and units located at operated and owned facilities as ofMarch 31, 2023 : TX CA AZ UT CO WA ID SC NE IA KS NV WI
Total
Number of operated facilities Skilled nursing operations 77 67 30 18 18 13 11 7 4 4 - 2 2 253 Senior living operations 1 - 1 2 5 1 - - 1 - - - - 11 Campuses(1) 4 3 5 1 1 - 1 - 2 2 7 - - 26 Number of operated beds/units Operational skilled nursing beds 9,859 6,760 4,517 1,989 1,890 1,227 998 866 413 368 570 358 100 29,915 Senior living units 509 197 757 163 725 98 21 - 313 31 213 - - 3,027 Number of owned and operated facilities Skilled nursing properties 18 10 9 7 4 2 5 5 1 - - - 2 63 Senior living communities 1 - - - 3 - - - 1 - - - - 5 Campuses(1) 2 1 4 - - - - - - - 4 - - 11 Number of owned and operated beds/units Owned skilled nursing beds 2,279 1,182 1,596 682 361 204 468 544 88 - 329 - 100 7,833 Owned Senior living units 443 42 356 - 461 - - - 274 - 129 - - 1,705 Number of owned and not operated facilities Senior living properties 6 2 1 - - - - - - - - 1 19 29
(1) Campuses represent facilities that offer both skilled nursing and senior living services.
During the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , we expanded our operations through long-term leases, with the addition of 19 stand-alone skilled nursing operations. These new operations added a total of 1,764 operational skilled nursing beds to be operated by our affiliated operating subsidiaries. For further discussion of our expansions, see Note 8, Operation Expansions in the Notes to the Interim Financial Statements. 33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Key Performance Indicators
We manage the fiscal aspects of our business by monitoring key performance indicators that affect our financial performance. Revenue associated with these metrics is generated based on contractually agreed-upon amounts or rate, excluding the estimates of variable consideration under the revenue recognition standard,Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606. These indicators and their definitions include the following: Skilled Services •Routine revenue - Routine revenue is generated by the contracted daily rate charged for all contractually inclusive skilled nursing services. The inclusion of therapy and other ancillary treatments varies by payor source and by contract. Services provided outside of the routine contractual agreement are recorded separately as ancillary revenue, including Medicare Part B therapy services, and are not included in the routine revenue definition. •Skilled revenue - The amount of routine revenue generated from patients in the skilled nursing facilities who are receiving higher levels of care under Medicare, managed care, Medicaid, or other skilled reimbursement programs. The other skilled patients who are included in this population represent very high acuity patients who are receiving high levels of nursing and ancillary services which are reimbursed by payors other than Medicare or managed care. Skilled revenue excludes any revenue generated from our senior living services. •Skilled mix - The amount of our skilled revenue as a percentage of our total skilled nursing routine revenue. Skilled mix (in days) represents the number of days our Medicare, managed care, or other skilled patients are receiving skilled nursing services at the skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients from all payor sources are receiving skilled nursing services at the skilled nursing facilities for any given period. •Average daily rates - The routine revenue by payor source for a period at the skilled nursing facilities divided by actual patient days for that revenue source for that given period. These rates exclude additional state relief funding, which includes payments we recognized as part of the ARPA, FFCRA and other state relief programs.
•Occupancy percentage (operational beds) - The total number of patients
occupying a bed in a skilled nursing facility as a percentage of the beds in a
facility which are available for occupancy during the measurement period.
•Number of facilities and operational beds - The total number of skilled nursing
facilities that we own or operate and the total number of operational beds
associated with these facilities.
Skilled Mix - Like most skilled nursing providers, we measure both patient days
and revenue by payor. Medicare, managed care and other skilled patients, whom we
refer to as high acuity patients, typically require a higher level of skilled
nursing and rehabilitative care. Accordingly, Medicare and managed care
reimbursement rates are typically higher than from other payors. In most states,
Medicaid reimbursement rates are generally the lowest of all payor types.
Changes in the payor mix can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.
The following table summarizes our overall skilled mix from our skilled nursing
services for the periods indicated as a percentage of our total skilled nursing
routine revenue and as a percentage of total skilled nursing patient days:
Three Months Ended March 31,
Skilled Mix: 2023 2022
Days 32.3 % 33.7 %
Revenue 52.7 % 54.3 %
Occupancy - We define occupancy derived from our skilled services as the ratio
of actual patient days (one patient day equals one patient occupying one bed for
one day) during any measurement period to the number of beds in facilities which
are available for occupancy during the measurement period. The number of beds in
a skilled nursing facility that are actually operational and available for
occupancy may be less than the total official licensed bed capacity. This
sometimes occurs due to the permanent dedication of bed space to alternative
purposes, such as enhanced therapy treatment space or other desirable uses
calculated to improve service offerings and/or operational efficiencies in a
facility. In some cases, three- and four-bed wards have been reduced to two-bed
rooms for resident comfort, and larger wards have been reduced to conform to
changes in Medicare requirements. These beds are seldom expected to be placed
back into service. We believe that reporting occupancy based on operational beds
is consistent with industry practices and provides a more useful measure of
actual occupancy performance from period to period.
34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our overall occupancy statistics for skilled
nursing operations for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31,
Occupancy for skilled services: 2023 2022
Operational beds at end of period 29,915 25,513
Available patient days 2,627,531 2,285,046
Actual patient days 2,047,705 1,695,964
Occupancy percentage (based on operational beds) 77.9 % 74.2 %
Segments
We have two reportable segments: (1) skilled services, which includes the
operation of skilled nursing facilities and rehabilitation therapy services and
(2) Standard Bearer, which is comprised of select properties owned by us through
our captive REIT and leased to skilled nursing and senior living operations,
including our own operating subsidiaries and third party operators.
We also reported an "all other" category that includes operating results from
our senior living operations, mobile diagnostics, transportation, other real
estate and other ancillary operations. These businesses are neither significant
individually, nor in aggregate and therefore do not constitute a reportable
segment. Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker,
or CODM, reviews financial information at the operating segment level.
Revenue Sources
The following table sets forth our total service revenue by payor source
generated by our skilled services segment and our "All Other" category and as a
percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31,
Skilled Services Other Service Revenue Total Service Revenue
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
Medicaid(1) $ 333,445 $ 261,587 $ 6,819 $ 4,761 $ 340,264 $ 266,348
Medicare 247,723 208,411 - - 247,723 208,411
Medicaid-skilled 57,927 45,949 - - 57,927 45,949
Subtotal 639,095 515,947 6,819 4,761 645,914 520,708
Managed care 156,663 127,786 - - 156,663 127,786
Private and other(2) 55,165 43,038 24,176 17,624 79,341 60,662
TOTAL SERVICE REVENUE $ 850,923 $ 686,771 $ 30,995 $ 22,385 $ 881,918 $ 709,156
Three Months Ended March 31,
Skilled Services Other Service Revenue Total Service Revenue
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
Medicaid(1) 39.2 % 38.1 % 22.0 % 21.3 % 38.6 % 37.6 %
Medicare 29.1 30.3 - - 28.1 29.4
Medicaid-skilled 6.8 6.7 - - 6.6 6.4
Subtotal 75.1 75.1 22.0 21.3 73.3 73.4
Managed care 18.4 18.6 - - 17.8 18.0
Private and other(2) 6.5 6.3 78.0 78.7 8.9 8.6
TOTAL SERVICE REVENUE 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
(1) Medicaid payor includes revenue for senior living operations and revenue related to state relief funding.
(2) Private and other payors in our "all other" category includes revenue from senior living operations and all payors generated in our other ancillary operations.
35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Skilled Services
Within our skilled nursing operations, we generate revenue from Medicaid, private pay, managed care and Medicare payors. We believe that our skilled mix, which we define as the number of days Medicare, managed care and other skilled patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing operations divided by the total number of days patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing operations, from all payor sources (less days from senior living services) for any given period, is an important indicator of our success in attracting high-acuity patients because it represents the percentage of our patients who are reimbursed by Medicare, managed care and other skilled payors, for whom we receive higher reimbursement rates. We are participating in supplemental payment programs in various states that provide supplemental Medicaid payments for skilled nursing facilities that are licensed to non-state government-owned entities such as city and county hospital districts. Numerous operating subsidiaries entered into transactions with various hospital districts providing for the transfer of the licenses for those skilled nursing facilities to the hospital districts. Each affected operating subsidiary agreement between the hospital district and our subsidiary is terminable by either party to fully restore the prior license status.
Standard Bearer
We generate rental revenue primarily by leasing post-acute care properties that we acquired to healthcare operators under triple-net lease arrangements, whereby the tenant is solely responsible for the costs related to the property, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair costs, subject to certain exceptions. As ofMarch 31, 2023 , our real estate portfolio within Standard Bearer is comprised of 103 real estate properties. Of these properties, 75 are leased to affiliated skilled nursing facilities wholly-owned and managed by us and 29 are leased to senior living operations wholly-owned and managed by Pennant. Of the 29 real estate operations leased to Pennant, one senior living operation is located on the same real estate property as a skilled nursing facility that we own and operate. During the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , we generated rental revenues of$19.7 million , of which$15.9 million was derived from affiliated wholly-owned healthcare operators, and therefore eliminated in consolidation.
Other
Within our senior living operations, we generate revenue primarily from private pay sources, with a portion earned from Medicaid payors or through other state-specific programs. In addition, we hold majority membership interests in certain of our other ancillary operations. Payment for these services varies and is based upon the service provided. The payment is adjusted for an inability to obtain appropriate billing documentation or authorizations acceptable to the payor and other reasons unrelated to credit risk.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our Interim Financial Statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inthe United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, cash flows, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. See Item 2., Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2022 for further discussion of critical accounting estimates. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies with which the estimates are developed sinceDecember 31, 2022 .
Industry Trends
The post-acute care industry has evolved to meet the growing demand for post-acute and custodial healthcare services generated by an aging population, increasing life expectancies and the trend toward shifting patient care to lower cost settings. The industry has evolved in recent years, which we believe has led to a number of favorable improvements in the industry, as described below: •Shift ofPatient Care to Lower Cost Alternatives - The growth of the senior population in theU.S. continues to increase healthcare costs, often faster than the available funding from government-sponsored healthcare programs. In response, federal and state governments have adopted cost-containment measures that encourage the treatment of patients in more cost-effective settings such as skilled nursing facilities, for which the staffing requirements and associated costs are often significantly lower than acute care hospitals and other post-acute care settings. As a result, skilled nursing facilities are generally serving a larger population of higher-acuity patients than in the past. 36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
•Significant Acquisition and Consolidation Opportunities - The skilled nursing industry is large and highly fragmented, characterized predominantly by numerous local and regional providers. Due to the increasing demands from hospitals and insurance carriers to implement sophisticated and expensive reporting systems, we believe this fragmentation provides us with significant acquisition and consolidation opportunities. •Improving Supply and Demand Balance - The number of skilled nursing facilities has declined modestly over the past several years. We expect that the supply and demand balance in the skilled nursing industry will continue to improve due to the shift of patient care to lower cost settings, an aging population and increasing life expectancies. •Increased Demand Driven by Aging Populations - As seniors account for an increasing percentage of the totalU.S. population, we believe the demand for skilled nursing and senior living services will continue to increase. According to the census projection released by theU.S. Census Bureau in early 2020, between 2016 and 2030, the number of individuals over 65 years old is projected to be one of the fastest growing segments ofthe United States population, growing from 16% to 21%. The Bureau expects this segment to increase nearly 50% to 73 million, as compared to the totalU.S. population which is projected to increase by 10% over that time period. Furthermore, the generation currently retiring has accumulated less savings than prior generations, creating demand for more affordable senior housing and skilled nursing services. As a high-quality provider in lower cost settings, we believe we are well-positioned to benefit from this trend. •Transition to Value-Based Payment Models - In response to rising healthcare spending inthe United States , commercial, government and other payors are generally shifting away from fee-for-service payment models towards value-based models, including risk-based payment models that tie financial incentives to quality, efficiency and coordination of care. We believe that patient-centered outcomes driven reimbursement models will continue to grow in prominence. Many of our operations already receive value-based payments, and as valued-based payment systems continue to increase in prominence, it is our view that our strong clinical outcomes will be increasingly rewarded. •Accountable Care Organizations and Reimbursement Reform - A significant goal ofU.S. federal health care reform is to transform the delivery of health care by changing reimbursement to reflect and support the quality and safety of care that providers deliver, increase efficiency and reduce growth in spending. Reimbursement models that provide financial incentives to encourage efficiency, affordability and high-quality care have been developed and implemented by government and commercial third-party payers. The most prolific of these models, theAccountable Care Organization (ACO) model, incentivizes groups of providers to share in savings that are achieved through the coordination of care and chronic disease management of an assigned patient population. Reimbursement methodology reform includes Value-Based Purchasing (VBP), in which a portion of provider reimbursement is redistributed based on relative performance, or improvement on designated economic, clinical quality and patient satisfaction metrics. In addition, theCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has implemented Episode-based demonstration, voluntary and mandatory payment initiatives that bundle acute care and post-acute care reimbursement. These bundled payment models incentivize cross-continuum care coordination and include financial and performance accountability for episodes of care. These reimbursement methodologies and similar programs are likely to continue and expand, both in government and commercial health plans. Many of our operations already participate in ACOs. With our focus on quality care and strong clinical outcomes, Ensign is well-positioned to benefit from these outcome-based payment models. We believe the post-acute industry has been and will continue to be impacted by several other trends. The use of long-term care (LTC) insurance is increasing among seniors as a means of planning for the costs of skilled nursing services. In addition, as a result of increased mobility in society, reduction of average family size and the increased number of two-wage earner couples, more residents are looking for alternatives outside the family for their care.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
General
Healthcare is an area of extensive and frequent regulatory change. Changes in
the law or new interpretations of existing laws may have a significant impact on
revenue, costs and business operations. Our independent operating subsidiaries
that provide healthcare services are subject to federal, state and local laws
relating to, among other things, licensure, quality and adequacy of care,
physical plant requirements, life safety, personnel and operating policies. In
addition, these same subsidiaries are subject to federal and state laws that
govern billing and reimbursement, relationships with vendors, business
relationships with physicians and workplace protection for healthcare staff.
Such laws include the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), the federal False Claims Act
(FCA), the Stark Law, the Health Care Emergency Temporary Standard and state
corporate practice of medicine statutes.
37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Governmental and other authorities periodically inspect the skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), senior living facilities and outpatient rehabilitation agencies of our independent operating subsidiaries to verify continued compliance with applicable regulations and standards. The operations must pass these inspections to remain licensed under state laws and to comply with Medicare and Medicaid provider agreements. The operations can only participate in these third-party payment programs if inspections by regulatory authorities reveal that the operations are in substantial compliance with applicable state and federal requirements. In the ordinary course of business, federal or state regulatory authorities may issue notices to the operations alleging deficiencies in certain regulatory practices. These statements of deficiency may require corrective action to regain and maintain compliance. In some cases, federal or state regulators may impose other remedies including imposition of civil monetary penalties, temporary payment bans, loss of certification as a provider in the Medicare or Medicaid program, or revocation of a state operating license. We believe that the regulatory environment surrounding the healthcare industry subjects providers to intense scrutiny. In the ordinary course of business, providers are subject to inquiries, investigations and audits by federal and state agencies related to compliance with participation and payment rules under government payment programs. These inquiries may originate from the United States Department of Health andHuman Services (HHS) Office of the Inspector General (OIG), state Medicaid agencies, state Attorney Generals, local and state ombudsman offices and CMS Recovery Audit Contractors, among other agencies. In response to the inquiries, investigations and audits, federal and state agencies continue to impose citations for regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory penalties, including demands for refund of overpayments, expanded civil monetary penalties that extend over long periods of time and date back to incidents prior to surveyor visits, Medicare and Medicaid payment bans and terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which may be temporary or permanent in nature. We vigorously contest each such regulatory outcome when appropriate; however, there are significant legal and other expenses involved that consume our financial and personnel resources. Expansion of enforcement activity could adversely affect our business, financial condition or the results of operations.
Proposed and Anticipated Rulemaking and Administrative Actions
The federal government, through CMS rulemaking, Presidential executive actions or Congressional legislation, and the state and local governments have recently released the following proposed rulemaking or administrative actions that may have an impact on our independent operating skilled nursing facilities (SNF) or long-term care (LTC) facilities:Biden-Harris Administration's Nursing Home Care Priorities - OnFebruary 28, 2022 , theBiden-Harris Administration issued a fact sheet regarding nursing home care priorities and reforms that it intends to seek in the coming year.The Biden-Harris Administration's desired changes are multi-faceted, concerning payment to facilities, staffing level requirements, training and retention of staff, standards of care offered to residents, increased transparency and public disclosure of ownership, and enhanced civil remedies and other authority to exercise upon facilities that do not satisfy CMS's standards. Proposed rules based on these directives are expected in 2023, including those highlighted below, with final rules to follow a notice-and-comment period required by law. Proposed Rule over Ownership Transparency - OnFebruary 13, 2023 , CMS issued a proposed rule that, if finalized and implemented, would require SNFs to disclose certain information regarding their ownership and managerial relationships. Consistent with the announcements by theBiden-Harris Administration inFebruary 2022 , CMS's proposed rule sought to enact Section 6101 of the ACA and require SNF disclosure of information to CMS that includes the identity of any person or legal entity that: (1) exercises financial, operational, or managerial control over any facility or part of a facility, or provides services to a facility that include its policies and procedures or cash management services; (2) leases or subleases real property to the facility, or owns 5% or more of the real property's total value; and (3) provides any management or administrative services (or consults regarding the same), or provides accounting or financial services to the SNF. Under the proposed rule, this information would be required upon initial enrollment (including a change of ownership) and during revalidation of Medicare participation. This proposed rule also would require a SNF to disclose its organizational structure and identities of employees and up to corporate officers and directors, to Medicare and state Medicaid agencies. Proposed Federal Legislation - OnMarch 9, 2023 , Rep.Debbie Dingell introduced bill H.R. 1493, the HCBS Access Act, which seeks to expand access to and resources available for home and community based services (HCBS). The purpose of this bill is to provide Medicaid funding to individuals who provide direct home- and community-based care to adults over the age of 60 or people who have disabilities. In addition to providing Medicaid funding for their services, this bill also seeks to provide financial resources for the training of these direct care providers, who are intended to provide services to the elderly or disabled that range from advocacy and community integration to transportation and daily assistance tasks ranging from bathing and laundry to meal preparation and housekeeping. This bill was introduced onMarch 9, 2023 and referred to theCommittee on Energy and Commerce ,Committee on Education and the Workforce, andCommittee on Oversight and Accountability , that same day. No further action has been taken on the HCBS Access Act since its introduction and referral to the aforementioned committees. 38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Proposed State Legislation - Many states in which our independent operating subsidiaries operate have introduced legislation that would create or change laws and regulations related to our business and industry. For example, several states are considering legislation that would require skilled nursing facility expenses be maintained at a specified ratio of reimbursement from governmental programs, thereby limiting the facility's profit or revenue. We continually monitor these introduced bills and other legislative developments so we can respond to the changing regulatory environment impacting our business. Proposed Fiscal Year 2024 Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF PPS) - OnApril 4, 2023 , CMS issued its proposed rule for the fiscal year 2024 SNF PPS, which included proposed changes for Medicare payment rates, the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) and the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. The proposed changes to the Medicare payment rates is an increase in the aggregate net market basket by 3.7%. The increase includes a 6.1% update to the market basket, which is based on a 2.7% current year market basket increase plus a 3.6% market basket error adjustment, less a 0.2% productivity adjustment and a negative 2.3% adjustment as a result of the second phase of the recalibrated parity adjustment. The proposed changes to the SNF QRP, which may be altered significantly if adopted in final rulemaking, include: (1) beginning in fiscal year 2025, adopting the discharge function score measure, which assesses the SNF residents who meet or exceed an expected discharge function score; (2) beginning in fiscal year 2026, adopting the "CoreQ" measure of short stay discharge to determine the percentage of residents discharged from a SNF within 100 days of admission and their satisfaction with the SNF's performance during the patient's residency; (3) beginning in fiscal year 2026, tracking the percentage of patients and residents up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccinations recommended based on theCDC 's most recent guidelines; and (4) beginning in fiscal year 2025, measuring the percentage of SNF healthcare personnel who are considered up-to-date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination requirements identified by theCDC 's most recent guidance. Further, in fiscal year 2025, CMS proposes removing scoring of SNFs for change in self-care and change in mobility for medical rehabilitation patients. CMS also proposes the public reporting of SNFs' transfer of health information to both other providers and patients as a measure of calculating and reporting the skill of any SNF on CMS's nursing home compare website. The proposed changes to the SNF VBP Program seeks the adoption of four new quality measures which include (1) nursing staff turnover measure in fiscal years 2024 and 2026; (2) the discharge function score measure in fiscal years 2025 and 2027, to determine the percentage of discharged SNF residents who meet or exceed expected discharge function scores; adoption of the long stay hospitalization measure per 100 patients to evaluate the hospitalization rate of long-stay SNF residents; (3) the percentage of residents experiencing falls to be reported in fiscal years 2025 and 2027; and (4) replacing the SNF 30-day all-cause readmission measure with the skilled nursing facility within stay potentially reasonable readmissions in fiscal year 2025.Biden-Harris Administration Executive Order - OnApril 18, 2023 ,President Biden signed an executive order seeking to increase access to affordable, high-quality long-term care for adults who are older or disabled. This executive order articulated theBiden-Harris Administration's policy to enable families to have access to affordable, high-quality care for older or disabled family members, and to support the workforce of individuals who would provide such care, including through adequate wages and the ability to unionize. This executive order directed HHS and CMS to take steps to use existing funding and resources to connect home- and community-based workers with education and training opportunities and to create greater opportunities for workers in those fields to obtain health insurance and retirement benefits. Consistent with theBiden-Harris Administration's February 2022 guidance discussed above, this executive order stated its priorities for HHS and CMS to investigate resources and methods to provide greater resources and training to caregivers, including family caregivers, and for theDepartment of Labor to provide resources and guidance to aid in the development and protection of a caregiving-focused workforce. Proposed CMS Minimum Staffing Mandate - Consistent with announcements by theBiden-Harris Administration inFebruary 2022 , CMS launched a nursing home staffing study focused on minimum level and staffing type required at nursing homes. The proposed rule for the fiscal year 2023 SNF PPS released in April of 2022 contained a request for information that solicited public comments regarding SNF and LTC facility staffing requirements. CMS received more than 3,000 comments in response to this request for information, which CMS evaluated along with other data in a mixed-methods study it conducted in August of 2022. Certain organizations, including theAmerican Health Care Association , have predicted that the mandatory minimum staffing mandate may be as high as 4.1 hours per patient day across nursing aides, licensed practical nurses and registered nurses involved in resident care. The information CMS has gathered and studied since 2022 will serve as the basis for proposed minimum staffing requirements in SNFs beginning this spring. CMS's final rule, once issued, may vary significantly from the substance of the proposed rule. 39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Coronavirus
In an effort to promote efficient care delivery and to decrease the spread of COVID-19, federal, state and local regulators have implemented new regulations and waived (in some cases, temporarily) certain existing regulations, including those set forth below, which are scheduled to expire onMay 11, 2023 . Temporary suspension of certain patient coverage criteria and documentation and care requirements - The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act of 2020 (the CARES Act) and a series of temporary waivers and guidance issued by CMS suspended various Medicare patient coverage criteria to ensure patients continue to have adequate access to care, notwithstanding the burdens placed on healthcare providers as related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these regulatory waivers were issued pursuant to Section 1135 of theSocial Security Act, which authorizes the HHS Secretary to temporarily waive or modify Medicare and Medicaid requirements for affected health care providers and facilities following the declaration of a Public Health Emergency (PHE). HHS also waived requirements specific to SNFs. While these waivers remained in effect during the quarter immediately ending before this report, all of these waivers are scheduled and expected to end with the PHE's expiration onMay 11, 2023 . Pursuant to the Emergency Waivers, CMS authorized temporary waivers on medical review requirements, effectiveMarch 1, 2020 . In addition, CMS also downgraded the priority for scheduled program audits and contract-level Risk Adjustment Data Validation audits for Medicare Advantage organizations, Part D sponsors, Medicare-Medicaid Plans and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly organizations. Reducing the priority of those standard or scheduled audit activities allows providers, CMS and other organizations to focus on patient care, including directing audit activities toward infection control. The reprioritization of its audit activities were time-limited and normal activities resumed in 2022. Beginning onMay 7, 2021 , CMS started to end certain Emergency Waivers related to the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning with waivers regarding data reporting and resident grouping, transfer and discharge. The expiration of additional Emergency Waivers in place for SNF and LTC facilities, along with the expiration of other Emergency Waivers for other residential facilities other than hospitals and critical access hospitals occurred onJune 6, 2022 . The first group of seven Emergency Waivers that expired onMay 7, 2022 were: (1) waiver of the requirement that residents participate in-person during resident groups; (2) physicians' ability to delegate tasks that otherwise would need to be personally performed by a physician within a SNF; (3) waiver of the requirement for physicians to make personal visits to patients, which the Emergency Waivers allow physicians to delegate to other clinicians; (4) waiver of the requirement for physicians and non-physician providers to conduct in-person visits to nursing home residents (and allowing those visits to be made via telemedicine as appropriate); (5) reducing LTC facilities' requirements to develop, implement and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that satisfies federal standards; (6) waiver of LTC facilities' obligation to participate in discharge planning for residents ending their care at the facility; and (7) waiver of the requirement for LTC facilities to provide residents with a copy of their records within two working days of a resident's request for those records. The Emergency Waivers that expired onJune 6, 2022 were: (1) waivers of SNF physical environment conditions for temporary use facilities (including COVID-19 treatment locations) and use of interior or non-residential space within a SNF to accommodate residents; (2) waivers of requirements for timely preventative maintenance for certain equipment, including dialysis equipment; (3) the waiver of inspection, testing and maintenance for the facilities and medical equipment used within ICFs and SNFs; (4) the waiver of inspection, testing and maintenance for compliance with applicable life safety codes and health care facility codes for intermediate care facilities (ICFs) and SNFs; (5) the waiver of CMS's requirement for ICFs and SNFs to have an exterior door or window in every room used for sleeping; (6) life safety code waivers of quarterly fire drills and allowing SNFs to erect temporary walls and barriers between patients; (7) waiving CMS's minimum training requirements for paid feeding assistants in LTC facilities; (8) CMS's waiver of its requirement for nurse aides within SNFs to receive at least 12 hours of annual in-service training; and (9) the waiver of a SNF's normal obligation not to employ any nursing aid longer than 4 months if he or she does not satisfy federal training and certification requirements. Examples of the Emergency Waivers still in effect as ofMarch 31, 2023 include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) approving temporary transfer, discharge and cohorting of patients to ensure that facilities can separate COVID-19 negative patients from those that are positive for or have been exposed to the virus; (2) allowing SNFs to provide a skill-in-place program for Medicare beneficiaries who are residents of the SNF that meet the skill-in-place criteria, foregoing the usual three-day qualifying hospital stay; and (3) temporarily waiving certain documentation and reporting requirements regarding patient admission, transfer and discharge. 40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Resuming visitation and resident rights - CMS has issued guidance to facilities throughout the PHE regarding patients' rights to visitation. While the CMS guidance issued inMarch 2020 directed facilities to severely restrict visitation, CMS subsequently provided and updated guidance through the course of the pandemic that broadens visitation and provides guidance on visitation procedures. OnSeptember 23, 2022 , CMS updated its visitation guidance to recommend the use of masks or face coverings when the county where the facility is located has a high rate of COVID-19 transmission, encouraged the use of masks or face coverings regardless of COVID-19 transmission status and allowed residents and visitors to choose not to wear masks or face coverings when alone in the resident's room or in a dedicated visitation area. This most recent CMS guidance also included updated advice related to isolation of known or suspected positive COVID-19 cases or those exposed to positive COVID-19 cases. The guidance also encouraged distancing during large group gatherings within the facility. Absent further rulemaking or superseding direction, this guidance regarding visitation and resident rights will expire and cease effect as of the PHE's anticipated expiration onMay 11, 2023 . Testing requirements - Beginning inApril 2020 , authorities in several states in which our independent operating subsidiaries are located began to mandate widespread COVID-19 testing at all nursing home and LTC facilities. This came after theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC ) stated that older adults are at a higher risk for serious illness from the coronavirus and issued updated testing guidelines for nursing homes. Some of these states were also publicly reporting COVID-19 outbreaks in facilities. OnApril 27, 2021 , CMS issued revised parameters for testing, specifying that the requirement for routine testing of staff applies only to those staff members that are unvaccinated - fully vaccinated staff do not have to be routinely tested. Thereafter, CMS's interim final rule (IFR) regarding COVID-19 testing of staff, released onSeptember 23, 2022 stated that routine testing of asymptomatic staff for COVID-19 is no longer generally recommended without exposure to COVID-19, but may be performed at the discretion of the LTC facility. This guidance clarified that individuals who show symptoms of COVID-19, regardless of vaccination status, should be tested for COVID-19 as soon as possible. Additionally, this IFR called for testing of residents and staff that came into close contact with a COVID-19 positive resident or staff, regardless of vaccination status, or test all resident and staff if close contact cannot be identified and investigation of an outbreak when there is a single positive COVID-19 case among residents or staff of the LTC facility. Absent further rulemaking or superseding direction, this IFR will expire and cease effect as of the PHE's anticipated expiration onMay 11, 2023 . Federal and state COVID-19 vaccination requirements - As the Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines received FDA approval, CMS developed an IFR requiring all workers within Medicare and Medicaid-participating nursing homes to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition,OSHA introduced an emergency temporary standard (ETS) requiring employers with more than 100 employees to mandate that its employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or submit to weekly testing for the virus. Both CMS's IFR andOSHA's emergency temporary standard (ETS) for vaccination were challenged in court and halted from enforcement in certain states, but theUnited States Supreme Court allowed CMS to enforce its vaccine mandate nationwide. In addition to the IFR mandating vaccinations for health facility workers, several states where our independent operating facilities are located had issued vaccine mandates that largely aligned with CMS's requirements, however these mandates have since been rescinded. OnOctober 23, 2022 , CMS issued further guidance unifying its recommendations for all facilities under its oversight, including SNFs and LTC facilities, reaffirming CMS's activities to verify vaccination of all SNF and LTC facility staff, and where necessary, to pursue corrective action for facilities found deficient in this requirement. Although the PHE will not automatically terminate CMS's IFR regarding staff vaccination, this IFR may likely expire during the fall of 2024 unless made permanent through formal rulemaking. Reporting requirements - In accordance with CMS reporting guidance, SNFs are required to report to theCDC National Health Safety Network certain information related to COVID-19 cases on a weekly basis. Facilities are also required to provide residents and staff with vaccine education and offer vaccines, when available, to residents and staff. The IFR published onAugust 23, 2021 requires facilities to develop policies and procedures to ensure the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine to residents and staff and to educate them concerning the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. CMS may initiate enforcement activities and assess civil monetary penalties for not meeting any of these COVID-19 related reporting requirements under this IFR and reaffirmed its intent to seek corrective action against SNFs and LTC facilities that do not satisfy these requirements. We do not believe these COVID-19 related requirements will have a material impact on our Interim Financial Statements. Survey Activity and Enforcement - In response to the COVID-19 pandemic environment, CMS included infection controls as part of its survey process along with updating its patients' and residents' rights to receive visitor guidance. The spectrum of remedies available to CMS for imposition includes increased monetary fines, shortened time periods to return to compliance and other administrative penalties for deficiencies. In advance of the PHE's anticipated expiration, CMS's surveyors had resumed using standard survey processes to continue assessing infection prevention and control under extant standards, rather than the COVID-19 specific focused infection tool that CMS used in 2021 and 2022. 41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Changes to Medicaid Reimbursement - In March of 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Relief Act (FFCRA) provided a 6.2% increase to the Federal Medicaid Assistance Percentage (FMAP) during the PHE. In addition to this funding increase, the FFCRA imposed conditions restricting the disenrollment and standards for re-enrolling Medicaid beneficiaries to promote continuous care of beneficiaries during the PHE. The CAA 2023 amended these Medicaid enrollment protections and increased FMAP funding provided in the FFCRA. In the first quarter of 2023, the FMAP increase CMS provides to the states will remain elevated by 6.2%, but will decline for the remaining quarters in 2023, subject to further reductions noted below: for the second quarter, April throughJune 2023 , this increase will be reduced to 5%; in the third quarter, from July through September, the FMAP increase will be reduced to 2.5%, and in October through December, the FMAP increase will be reduced to 1.5%. Previously, the FMAP funding was dependent on the termination of the PHE. The ultimate amount of funding from each state will vary substantially based on that states' policies. CMS's provision of these increased FMAP funds to states is conditioned upon states reporting to CMS certain Medicaid-related information, including data pertaining to Medicaid renewals, termination of Medicaid coverage, beneficiary customer service information, and other eligibility and renewal information that may be identified in regulations or by the HHS Secretary. States that do not report required data to CMS beginning in July of 2023 will be penalized 0.25 percentage points, up to a total of one percentage point, for each quarter the state does not report data to CMS. The CAA 2023 also grants CMS authority to impose fines, penalties, and other sanctions upon states that do not comply with this law's requirements for the unwinding of increased FMAP payments. Under the CAA 2023, states may begin disenrolling Medicaid beneficiaries beginning onApril 1, 2023 after a full review of such beneficiaries' eligibility. The FFCRA contemplated continuous Medicaid enrollment until the end of the PHE and provided funding for enrollment during that duration. The CAA 2023 winds down this Medicaid spending for continuous enrollment in phases, ultimately reducing CMS's contribution to state-administered Medicaid programs. CMS guidance permits states up to 14 months to initiate and process traditional Medicaid renewals, including the eligibility and enrollment process.
Medicare
Medicare presently accounts for approximately 29.1% of our skilled nursing services revenue year-to-date, being our second-largest payor. The Medicare program and its reimbursement rates and rules are subject to frequent change. These include statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments (including retroactive adjustments), administrative or executive orders and government funding restrictions, all of which may materially adversely affect the rates at which Medicare reimburses us for our services. Budget pressures often lead the federal government to reduce or place limits on reimbursement rates under Medicare. Implementation of these and other types of measures has in the past, and could in the future, result in substantial reductions in our revenue and operating margins.
Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM)
The SNF PPS Rule became effectiveOctober 1, 2019 . The SNF PPS Rule includes a new case-mix model that focuses on the patient's condition (clinically relevant factors) and resulting care needs, rather than on the volume of care provided, to determine Medicare reimbursement. The case mix-model is called the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM), which utilizes clinically relevant factors for determining Medicare payment by using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes and other patient characteristics as the basis for patient classification. PDPM utilizes five case-mix adjusted payment components: physician therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, nursing and social services and non-therapy ancillary services. It also uses a sixth non-case mix component to cover utilization of SNFs' resources that do not vary depending on resident characteristics. PDPM replaces the existing case-mix classification methodology, Resource Utilization Groups, Version IV. The structure of PDPM moves Medicare towards a more value-based, unified post-acute care payment system. For example, PDPM adjusts Medicare payments based on each aspect of a resident's care, thereby more accurately addressing costs associated with medically complex patients. PDPM also removes therapy minutes as the basis for therapy payment. Finally, PDPM adjusts the SNFs' per diem payments to reflect varying costs throughout the stay, through the physician therapy, occupational therapy and non-therapy ancillary services components.
In addition, PDPM is intended to reduce paperwork requirements for performing
patient assessments. Under the SNF PPS PDPM system, the payment to SNFs and
nursing homes is based heavily on the patient's condition rather than the
specific services provided by each SNF.
42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Skilled Nursing Facility - Quality Reporting Program (SNF QRP)
The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (IMPACT Act) provided data reporting requirements for certain Post-Acute-Care (PAC) providers. The IMPACT Act requires that each SNF submit its quality measures data. If a SNF does not submit required quality data, its payment rates are reduced by 2.0% for each such fiscal year. Application of the 2.0% reduction may result in payment rates for a fiscal year being less than the preceding fiscal year. In addition, reporting-based reductions to the market basket increase factor will not be cumulative; they will only apply for the fiscal year involved. A SNF's Medicare Administrative Contractor will issue the facility a notice of non-compliance if it does not satisfy its QRP reporting requirements.
The SNF QRP standardized a number of standardized patient assessment data
elements. The SNF QRP applies to freestanding SNFs, SNFs affiliated with acute
care facilities and all non-critical access hospital swing-bed rural hospitals.
OnJuly 29, 2021 , two new reporting measures were required under the SNF QRP. Starting with the FY 2023 SNF QRP, SNFs are required for the first time to report the SNF Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) measure, which tracks the number of infections requiring hospitalization following a medical intervention, and the COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Personnel (HCP) measure, which tracks COVID-19 vaccination of staff in order to assess whether SNFs are taking steps to limit the spread of COVID-19. The Transfer of Healthcare (TOH) information data SNFs must report, which is included in the Patient-Post-Acute Care measurement, will be changed to exclude SNF patients discharged to their homes under the care of either a home health service or hospice. The elimination of this information will change how the TOH is used in calculating Patient-Post-Acute Care measurement, and may have an impact on our quality ratings and reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid on a prospective basis. Beginning inMarch 2020 , due to the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS issued a temporary suspension of SNF QRP reporting requirements effective untilJune 30, 2020 . This effectively gave SNFs discretion as to whether to report data from the fourth quarter (October 1, 2019 -December 31, 2019 ), and removed reporting requirements entirely for the first and second quarters of 2020 (January 1, 2020 -June 30, 2020 ). SNFs were required to resume timely quality data collection and submission of measure and patient assessment data effectiveJune 30, 2020 . InJanuary 2022 , SNF ratings based on the resumed data reporting were recalculated for publication. In July of 2022, CMS announced revisions to calculating its five-star ratings for the Nursing Home Compare website. Under this new calculation, points are assigned to a SNF based on its performance across six measures: (1) case-mix adjusted total nurse staffing levels (including registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nursing aides), measured by hours per resident per day; (2) case-mix adjusted registered nurse staffing levels, measured by hours per resident per day; (3) case-mix adjusted total nurse staffing levels (including registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nursing aides), measured by hours per resident day on the weekend; (4) total nurse turnover, defined as the percentage of nursing staff that left the nursing home over a 12-month period; (5) registered nurse turnover, defined as the percentage of registered nursing staff that left the nursing home over a 12-month period; and (6) administrator turnover, defined as the percentage of administrators that left the nursing home over a 12-month period. These six measures will be measured on a quarterly basis. Staff measurements are scored based on the points assigned to these six measures. For case-mix adjusted total nurse staffing and case-mix adjusted registered nurse staffing, each measure is scored on a 100-point scale in 10-point increments. For case-mix adjusted total nurse staffing on weekends, total nurse turnover, and total registered nurse turnover, each measure is scored on a 50-point scale in five-point increments. The measure of administrator turnover is measured on a 30-point scale, with points assigned based on the number of administrator departures during the measurement period. The result of these staffing measures will affect a SNF's total five-star score reported on the Nursing Home Compare website. These six new measures were included in the five-star rating inOctober 2022 in addition to other changes. In addition, CMS also implemented a planned increase to the quality measure reporting thresholds, increasing each threshold by one-half of the average improvement of quality measure scores since CMS last set quality measure thresholds. Going forward, CMS plans to implement similar rating threshold increases every six months. OnJuly 29, 2022 , CMS announced the adoption of a process measure for influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel within SNFs. This measure will be determined by the percentage of SNF healthcare personnel who receive an influenza vaccine any time from when it first becomes available throughMarch 31 of the following year. SNFs began submitting this data onOctober 1, 2022 throughMarch 31, 2023 . Additionally, CMS revised certain SNF data reporting requirements, including the transfer of health information measures and certain patient assessment data elements, including ethnicity, preferred language, health literacy, and social isolation, untilOctober 1, 2023 . 43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnJanuary 25, 2023 , CMS announced that the most recently reported QRP data was incorporated in theJanuary 2023 refresh of the information available through the SNF Care Compare website. OnFebruary 14, 2023 , CMS released a draft of the latest minimum data set (MDS) specifications for information to be collected and reported to CMS by SNFs under the QRP. CMS anticipates releasing the final MDS specifications in May of 2023, with these specifications and reporting requirements implemented onOctober 1, 2023 .
Medicare Annual Payment Rule
CMS is required to calculate an annual Medicare market-basket update to the payment rates. OnJuly 29, 2022 , CMS issued a final rule for fiscal year 2023 that increased the Medicare payment rates to aggregate net market basket by 2.7%. The increase is resulted from the 5.1% update to the market basket, which is based on a 3.9% current year market basket increase plus a 1.5% market basket error adjustment, less a 0.3% productivity adjustment and a negative 2.3% adjustment as a result of the recalibrated parity adjustment. The recalibrated parity adjustment is being phased in at a rate of 2.3% per year over two years.
Sequestration of Medicare Rates
The Budget Control Act of 2011 requires a mandatory, across the board reduction in federal spending, called a sequestration. Medicare FFS claims with dates of service or dates of discharge on or afterApril 1, 2013 incur a 2.0% reduction in Medicare payments. All Medicare rate payments and settlements have incurred this mandatory reduction and will continue to be in place through at least 2023, unlessCongress takes further action. In response to COVID-19, the CARES Act temporarily suspended the automatic 2.0% reduction of Medicare claim reimbursements for the period ofMay 1, 2020 throughDecember 31, 2020 . OnDecember 27, 2020 , the Consolidated Appropriations Act further suspended the 2.0% payment adjustment throughMarch 31, 2021 . OnApril 14, 2021 ,Congress extended the suspension of the 2.0% payment adjustment throughDecember 31, 2021 . OnDecember 10, 2021 ,President Biden signed into law a bill to postpone the 2.0% payment adjustment throughApril 1, 2022 ; fromApril 1, 2022 throughJune 30, 2022 , the 2.0% payment adjustment is reduced from 2.0% to 1.0%. To pay for the change,Congress would increase the sequester cuts by one year to fiscal year 2030. As ofJuly 1, 2022 , Medicare's sequestration cuts have reverted to 2%, which was the sequestration rate in effect before the COVID-19 PHE commenced. Under the CAA 2023, a further 4% cut to Medicare spending that would have been required under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO) was waived for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. Instead, the CAA 2023 deferred any further Medicare sequestration under PAYGO until fiscal year 2025. The CAA 2023 also offset planned Medicare sequestrations that were as high as 4%, and instead maintained fee schedule cuts of approximately 2%.
Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing (SNF-VBP) Program
The SNF-VBP Program rewards SNFs with incentive payments based on the quality of care they provide to Medicare beneficiaries, as measured by a hospital readmissions measure. CMS annually adjusts its payment rules for SNFs using the SNF-VBP Program. To fund the SNF-VBP Program incentive payment pool, CMS withheld 2% of Medicare payments and will redistribute 60% of the withheld payments back to SNFs through the program. The program also introduced quality measures to assess how health information is shared and adopted a number of standardized patient assessment data elements that assess factors such as cognitive function and mental status, special services and social determinants of health. OnJuly 29, 2021 , CMS finalized its changes for measuring the performance period and amending the data to be reported to CMS, which impacted the SNF-VBP Program rate adjustment to account for COVID-19 impacting readmission rates and SNF admissions during the performance periods of fiscal year 2020. The deadlines for baseline period quality measure quarterly reporting and performance periods and standards will start in the 2023 program year. OnJuly 29, 2022 , CMS released the final rule electing to not apply the SNF 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Measure (SNFRM) as part of performance scoring for fiscal year 2023. CMS will still publicly report the SNFRM, but it will not affect SNF payments. The final rule for the fiscal year 2023 SNF PPS also provided for SNF-VBP program expansion beyond the use of its single, all-cause hospital readmission measure to determine payment, with the inclusion of measures in fiscal year 2026 for SNF healthcare associated infections requiring hospitalization (SNF HAI) and total nursing hours per resident day measures, and in fiscal year 2027, the discharge to community post acute care measure for SNFs, which assesses the rate of successful discharges to the community from a SNF setting. 44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents OnFebruary 28, 2022 , theBiden Administration published a fact sheet stating its priorities for making changes to senior care, including potential changes to regulations affecting LTCs and SNFs. The SNF-VBP Program was identified as an area for change, with staffing levels, retention and resident experience affecting reimbursement. Following studies by CMS, proposed rules that may affect the SNF-VBP Program are expected by early 2023, with final rules to follow after a notice-and-comment period. In March of 2023, CMS updated its FAQ for the SNF-VBP program to incorporate information and details from the fiscal year 2023 SNF PPS final rule. This FAQ contained information regarding scoring policies for the fiscal year 2023 SNF PPS final rule, based on the SNF readmission measure not being counted for 2023 due to the potential effects of the COVID-19 PHE in calculating that score and information about technical updates for the measurement of SNF readmissions.
Part B Rehabilitation Requirements
Some of our revenue is paid by the Medicare Part B program under a fee schedule. Part B services are limited with a payment cap by combined speech-language pathology services (SLP), physical therapy (PT) services and a separate annual cap for occupational therapy (OT) services. These caps were implemented under the authority of the Balanced Budget Amendments of 1997. These amounts were previously associated with the financial limitation amounts. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA) repealed those caps while retaining and adding additional limitations to ensure appropriate therapy services. This policy does not limit the amount of medically necessary Medicare Part B therapy services a beneficiary may receive. The BBA establishes coding modifier requirements to obtain payments beyond the updated KX modifier thresholds, discussed below, and reaffirms the specific$3,000 claim audit threshold requirements for the Medicare Administrative Contractors. For PT and SLP combined the threshold for coding modifier requirements was$2,150 for CY 2022 with the same threshold for OT services. For CY 2023, the KX modifier threshold has been increased by 3.8%, to$2,230 for PT and SLP, with the same threshold for OT services as well. The KX modifier is a modifier added to medical claims to indicate the providing clinician attests that the services corresponding to that claim were medically necessary and that the justification for those services is contained within the patient's medical records. This modifier is intended for use where the services will exceed the threshold for those services set by the BBA and updated by annual fee schedule rules, yet are still appropriate and medically necessary, and thus should be compensated by Medicare. Consistent with CMS's "Patients over Paperwork" initiative, the agency has also been moving toward eliminating burdensome claims-based functional reporting requirements. Beginning in 2021, CMS rescinded 21 problematic National Correct Coding Initiative edits impacting outpatient therapy services, including services furnished under Medicare Part B primarily related to PT and OT services, removing a coding burden caused by requirements for additional documentation and claim modifier coding. The calendar year 2022 PFS (2022 PFS) required the use of new modifiers to identify and make payments at 85% of the otherwise applicable Part B payment amount for PT and OT services furnished in whole, or in part by PT and OT assistants. The 2022 PFS resulted in FFS Medicare payments adjusted by a sequester of 1% fromApril 1, 2022 throughJune 30, 2022 , and further adjusted by a total of 2% fromJuly 1, 2022 throughDecember 31, 2022 . OnNovember 1, 2022 , CMS issued the calendar year 2023 PFS resulted in a PFS conversion factor of$33.06 , a decrease of$1.55 from the calendar year 2022 PFS conversion factor of$34.61 . This is a 4.45% cut to the conversion factor for calendar year 2023. The Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) continues at a 50% reduction, which is applied to therapy procedures by reducing payments for practice expense of the second and subsequent procedures when services provided beyond one unit of one procedure are provided on the same day. The implementation of MPPR includes (1) facilities that provide Medicare Part B speech-language pathology, occupational therapy and physical therapy services and bill under the same provider number; and (2) providers in private practice, including speech-language pathologists, who perform and bill for multiple services in a single day. 45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnMay 27, 2020 , pursuant to its authority under the Emergency Waivers, CMS added physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech-language pathology to the list of approved telehealth Providers for the Medicare Part B programs provided by a SNF. Subsequently, the calendar year 2021 and 2022 PFS Final Rules added certain of these PT and OT services to the list of Medicare telehealth services on a temporary basis through at least the end of calendar year 2023. OnDecember 31, 2020 , CMS announced its 2021 update to the list of codes that describe Medicare Part B outpatient therapy services, making permanent existing and new codes introduced during the COVID-19 PHE for use under PT, OT, or SLP, including several telehealth codes as "sometimes therapy," to permit physicians and certain non-physician practitioners to render these services outside a therapy plan of care when appropriate. "Sometimes therapy" codes will not have the MPPR applied. OnNovember 19, 2021 , CMS expanded these "sometimes therapy" codes further for the 2022 PFS, including five new codes for remote therapeutic monitoring treatment, which are broader than pre-existing monitoring codes and include measuring and evaluating adherence and response to medication and therapy. The Emergency Waivers allow therapists to bill Telehealth therapy services up to 151 days after the end of the PHE. The CAA 2023 also extended certain, but not all, telehealth flexibilities untilDecember 31, 2024 , ensuring that those select telehealth flexibilities would not expire with the PHE upon its anticipated expiration date ofMay 11, 2023 . The CAA 2023 extended the use of certain codes for Telehealth Services beyond the PHE Extension and through the end of CY 2024. OnFebruary 13, 2023 , CMS extended the use of these codes for telehealth through the end of CY 2023. Pursuant to the Emergency Waivers, CMS allowed for the facility to bill an originating site fee to CMS for telehealth services provided to Medicare Part B beneficiary residents of the facility when the services were provided by a physician from an alternate location, effectiveMarch 6, 2020 and ending onMay 7, 2022 . Our facilities have thus ceased using these telemedicine Emergency Waivers upon their termination.
Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
The requirements under the Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) provide greater operational flexibility and update information under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Such flexibility includes: (i) more lenient standards applicable to the current requirement that the PACE organization be monitored for compliance with the PACE program requirements during and after a 3-year trial period and (ii) relieving certain restrictions placed upon the interdisciplinary team that comprehensively assesses and provides for the individual needs of each PACE participant by allowing one person to fill two roles and permitting secondary participation in the PACE program. Further, non-physician primary care providers can provide certain services in place of primary care physicians. OnFebruary 1, 2023 , CMS issued its final rule, which takes effect onApril 3, 2023 , requiring the collection of data by Medicare Advantage organizations and their service providers and the submission of data to CMS for risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits. The purpose of these RADV audits is to maintain the accuracy of risk-adjusted payments made to Medicare Advantage organizations.
Decisions Regarding Skilled Nursing Facility Payment
Medicare reimbursement rates and rules are subject to frequent change.
Historically, adjustments to reimbursement under Medicare have had a significant
effect on our revenue. The federal government and state governments continue to
focus on efforts to curb spending on healthcare programs such as Medicare and
Medicaid. We are not able to predict the outcome of the legislative process. We
also cannot predict the extent to which proposals will be adopted or, if adopted
and implemented, what effect, if any, such proposals and existing new
legislation will have on us. Efforts to impose reduced allowances, greater
discounts and more stringent cost controls by government and other payors are
expected to continue and could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
These include statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments (including
retroactive adjustments), administrative or executive orders and government
funding restrictions, all of which may materially adversely affect the rates at
which Medicare reimburses us for our services. Budget pressures often lead the
federal government to reduce or place limits on reimbursement rates under
Medicare. Implementation of these and other types of measures has in the past,
and could in the future, result in substantial reductions in our revenue and
operating margins. For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes
to the Medicare program and related reimbursement rates, see Part II, Item 1A
Risk Factors under the headings Risks Related to Our Business and Industry.
46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Various healthcare reform provisions became law upon enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Healthcare Education and Reconciliation Act (collectively, the ACA). The reforms contained in the ACA have affected our operating subsidiaries in some manner and are directed in large part at increased quality and cost reductions. Several of the reforms are very significant and could ultimately change the nature of our services, the methods of payment for our services and the underlying regulatory environment. These reforms include modifications to the conditions of qualification for payment, bundling of payments to cover both acute and post-acute care and the imposition of enrollment limitations on new providers. The upcoming Congressional elections inthe United States and policies implemented by the current and former Presidential administration have resulted in significant changes in legislation, regulation, implementation of Medicare, Medicaid and government policy. In August of 2022,Congress passed and theBiden-Harris Administration signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), which continued and expanded certain provisions of the ACA. Among other things, the IRA extended premium subsidies paid by the federal government, which were scheduled to expire at the end of 2022, until the end of 2024, resulting in subsidies being available to offset or reduce the costs of private health insurance policies for older persons on fixed incomes or with limited savings. This may aid older patients in obtaining or keeping their health insurance in order to pay for long-term care services. Other healthcare-related provisions of the IRA include phased-in provisions for Medicare to negotiate the prices of certain prescription drugs, limiting the out-of-pocket cost of prescribed drugs to Medicare Part D recipients to$2,000 per year (in addition to a monthly cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug expenses) and limiting the monthly cost of insulin to$35 . At the end of 2022,Congress passed and theBiden-Harris Administration signed into law the CAA 2023, which revised the funds available to fund Medicare in 2023 and deferred the PAYGO sequestration of Medicare expenses, resulting in the calendar year 2023 PFS increasing its conversion factor from$33.06 to more than$33.89 . The results of the 2022 midterm elections, which led to a change in control of theHouse of Representatives and the eventual 2024 presidential election may significantly alter the current regulatory framework and impact our business and the health care industry, including any further extensions or expansions of certain ACA provisions, namely recent rulemaking activity regarding ACA Section 1557's anti-discrimination provisions. We continually monitor these developments so we can respond to the changing regulatory environment impacting our business.
Requirements of Participation
CMS has requirements that providers, including SNFs and other LTC facilities must meet in order to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid Programs. Some of these requirements can be burdensome and costly. One such requirement of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs involves limitations around the use of pre-dispute, binding arbitration agreements by LTC facilities. CMS has issued guidance and direction around arbitration, to include: the facility must not require signing of an arbitration agreement as a condition of admission or a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility, and the agreement must expressly contain language to this effect; the facility must inform the resident or the resident's representative of the right not to sign the agreement; the facility must confirm that the agreement is explained in a manner that can be understood and that the resident or their representative acknowledges their understanding of the agreement; the agreement must provide for the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing; and the agreement may not contain language that prohibits or discourages communications with federal, state, or local officials, including federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees, and representatives of theOffice of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsperson .Congress has routinely introduced, but not passed, legislation addressing the issue of arbitration agreements used by LTC facilities. While legislative action is possible in the future, federal regulations and state/federal laws remain our primary source of authority over the use of pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements. OnJune 29, 2022 , CMS announced updated guidance for Phase 2 and 3 of the Requirements of Participation. CMS distributed these updates to surveyors and state agencies in order to, among other things, enhance responses to resident complaints and reported incidents. This updated guidance arises directly fromPresident Biden's March 2022 State of the Union Address and accompanying fact sheet regarding nursing home areas of study and potential change. The guidance focuses on the following topics: (1) resident abuse and neglect (including reporting of abuse); (2) admission, transfer and discharge; (3) mental health and substance abuse disorders; (4) nurse staffing and reporting of payroll to evaluate staffing sufficiency; (5) residents' rights (including visitation); (6) potential inaccurate diagnoses or assessments; (7) prescription and use of pharmaceuticals, including psychotropics and drugs that act like psychotropics; (8) infection prevention and control; (9) arbitration of disputes between facilities and residents; (10) psychosocial outcomes and related severity; and (11) the timeliness and completion of state investigations to improve consistency in the application of standards among various states. 47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnJuly 29, 2022 , CMS updated the Medicare Requirements of Participation for LTC facilities, which includes the modification of requirements associated with a facility's physical environment to minimize unnecessary renovation expenses that could result in the closure of LTC facilities because of the related expense. Specifically, CMS is "grandfathering" certain facilities and will allow LTC facilities that were participating in Medicare beforeJuly 5, 2016 and that previously used the Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES) to continue using the 2001 FSES mandatory values when determining compliance with applicable standards. In addition, CMS updated the Requirements of Participation to include revising existing qualification requirements for directors of food and nutrition services in LTC facilities while "grandfathering" in directors with two or more years of experience and certain minimum training in food safety so that they may continue in that role without obtaining more specific educational and certification requirements. OnFebruary 17, 2023 , CMS further revised the survey resources that CMS and state surveyors use in evaluating LTC facilities' compliance with federal Requirements for Participation. This revision incorporated the recent changes to CMS's focused infection control survey item, which CMS had removed in favor of standard infection control survey measures. CMS published these updated survey resources on its website along with annotations to Appendix PP of the Medicare State Operations Manual. These changes were made to the most recent revision of LTC facility survey documents that CMS had last revised in October of 2022. InOctober 2022 , CMS had published the survey resources CMS and state surveyors would be using to evaluate LTC facilities' compliance with vaccination and reporting requirements, which CMS updated in November of 2022. These updates provided more information for state surveyors to utilize when evaluating LTC facilities' compliance with the Medicare Requirements of Participation, as well as included guidance for facilities on operationalizing compliance with these requirements based on how surveyors would measure and evaluate facility performance. OnSeptember 27, 2022 , CMS also provided a summary of its major software enhancements, describing the tools updated and used by CMS to measure and evaluate LTC facility compliance with the Medicare Requirements of Participation.
Civil and Criminal Fraud and Abuse Laws and Enforcement
Various complex federal and state laws exist which govern a wide array of referrals, relationships and arrangements, and prohibit fraud by healthcare providers. Governmental agencies are devoting increasing attention and resources to such anti-fraud efforts. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 expanded the penalties for healthcare fraud. Additionally, in connection with our involvement with federal healthcare reimbursement programs, the government or those acting on its behalf may bring an action under theFCA , alleging that a healthcare provider has defrauded the government by submitting a claim for items or services not rendered as claimed, which may include coding errors, billing for services not provided and submitting false or erroneous cost reports. The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (FERA) expanded the scope of theFCA by, among other things, creating liability for knowingly and improperly avoiding repayment of an overpayment received from the government and broadening protections for whistleblowers. TheFCA clarifies that if an item or service is provided in violation of the AKS, the claim submitted for those items or services is a false claim that may be prosecuted under theFCA as a false claim. Civil monetary penalties under theFCA range from approximately$0.01 to$0.03 million per violation and are adjusted annually for inflation. Under the qui tam or "whistleblower" provisions of theFCA , a private individual with knowledge of fraud may bring a claim on behalf of the federal government and receive a percentage of the federal government's recovery. Due to these whistleblower incentives, lawsuits have become more frequent. Many states also have a false claim prohibition that mirrors or closely tracks the federalFCA . Federal law also provides that the OIG has the authority to exclude individuals and entities from federally funded health care programs on a number of grounds, including, but not limited to, certain types of criminal offenses, licensure revocations or suspensions and exclusion from state or other federal healthcare programs. CMS can recover overpayments from health care providers up to five years following the year in which payment was made. OnFebruary 28, 2022 , theBiden-Harris Administration published a fact sheet regarding nursing home care, which identified the Administration's priorities of further funding for SNF and LTC facility inspections, enhancing civil penalties on poor-performing facilities and increasing the scrutiny of companies that operate more than one facility. Proposed rules based on these directives and studies are expected in 2023, with final rules to follow after a notice-and-comment period. 48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
InNovember 2019 , the OIG released a report of its investigation into overpayments to hospitals that did not comply with Medicare's post-acute-care transfer policy. Hospitals violating this policy transferred patients to certain post-acute-care settings, such as SNFs, but claimed the higher reimbursements associated with discharges to homes. A similar OIG audit report, released inFebruary 2019 , focused on improper payments for SNF services when the Medicare three-day inpatient hospital stay requirement was not met. In 2021, the OIG released the result of an audit finding that Medicare overpaid millions of dollars of chronic care management (CCM) services. The OIG's 2021 report found that in calendar years 2017 and 2018, Medicare overpaid millions of dollars in CCM claims. In 2022, the OIG released an audit revealing that CMS had not collected$226 million , or 45%, of identified overpayments within that period, potentially affecting SNFs. These investigatory actions by OIG demonstrate its increased scrutiny into post-hospital SNF care provided to beneficiaries and may encourage additional oversight or stricter compliance standards. Most recently, onJanuary 19, 2023 , the OIG released a report finding that more than 1,000 nursing homes had COVID-19 infection rates of 75% or more during the first year of the pandemic. The OIG's conclusion from this study is that better protections are needed for future emergencies. Based on this study's findings, the OIG recommended the following: (1) more scrutiny of existing nursing staff requirements; (2) improving how surveys can identify infection control risks and improve on nursing home responses to those risks; and (3) targeting nursing homes in need of infection control intervention for enhanced oversight and assistance. The OIG study further noted that CMS agreed with its first and third recommendations for corrective action. On numerous occasions, CMS has indicated its intent to vigilantly monitor overall payments to SNFs, paying particular attention to facilities that have high reimbursements for ultra-high therapy, therapy resource utilization groups with higher activities of daily living scores and long average lengths of stay. The OIG recognizes that there is a strong financial incentive for facilities to bill for higher levels of therapies, even when not needed by patients. We cannot predict the extent to which the OIG's recommendations to CMS will be implemented and, what effect, if any, such proposals would have on us. Our business model, like those of some other for-profit operators, is based in part on seeking out higher-acuity patients whom we believe are generally more profitable and over time our overall patient mix has consistently shifted to higher-acuity in most facilities we operate. We also use specialized care-delivery software that assists our caregivers in more accurately capturing and recording services in order to, among other things, increase reimbursement to levels appropriate for the care actually delivered. These efforts may place us under greater scrutiny with the OIG, CMS, our fiscal intermediaries, recovery audit contractors and others. Federal Healthcare Reform Five-Star Quality Reporting Metrics - The Quality Payment Program (QPP) was created under the Medicare Access andChildren's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act of 2015. This program was based on the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) or the use of Alternative Payment Models (APM), which relied on quality data CMS gathered and evaluated using the Five-Star Quality Rating system, which includes a rating of one to five in various categories. These categories include (but are not limited to) the results of surveys conducted by state inspectors, other health inspection outcomes, staffing, spending, readmissions and stay durations; the data collected and its weighting in determining a rating on a scale of one to five stars is subject to periodic and ongoing revision, re-balancing and adjustment by CMS to reflect market conditions and CMS's priorities in patient care. Since 2020, CMS's measurement of the data reported by providers, including SNFs, has become more competitive and resulted in a reduction of four- and five-star rankings available under CMS's Five-Star Quality Rating system. The Five-Star Quality reporting system for nursing homes is displayed on CMS's consumer-basedNursing Home Compare website. CMS also displays a consumer alert icon next to nursing homes that have been cited for incidents of abuse, neglect, or exploitation on the Nursing Home Compare website, which is updated monthly with CMS's refresh of survey inspection results on that website. In 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS temporarily froze SNF Quality Reporting Program data, including data in the staffing and health inspection domains, on the Nursing Home Compare website to account for the then-suspended reporting and inspection obligations. After suspending inspections in early 2020, CMS announced a new and targeted inspection plan inAugust 2020 to focus on urgent patient safety threats and infection control, which affected the number of nursing homes inspected and the substance of those inspections. These safety inspections collected different information than traditional surveys and as a result these survey results were not incorporated inCMS's Five-Star Quality ratings for SNFs from March throughDecember 2020 . CMS resumed calculating nursing homes' health inspection ratings onJanuary 27, 2021 and has continued to include this measure in subsequent updates. 49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Similarly, although staff reporting requirements were waived for the first six months of 2020, this waiver ended onJune 25, 2020 . Thereafter, SNFs were required to report staffing data to CMS, which was incorporated into CMS's Five-Star Quality rating beginning inJanuary 2021 . TheJanuary 2021 Five-Star Quality rating calculation reflected SNF-provided quarterly updates of most quality measures for the period betweenJune 2019 andJune 2020 , reflecting the time period in which the normal reporting and inspection obligations were frozen due to COVID-19. CMS's refreshes of the Nursing Home Compare website since January of 2021 have included these quality measures and other new measures as discussed within this Government Regulation heading. CMS's last refresh of the Nursing Home Compare website occurred in January of 2023. In January of 2022, CMS issued a bulletin stating that as of the same month, the Nursing Home Compare website would begin reporting SNF weekend staffing as well as staff tenure and other collected staffing data. Beginning in July of 2022, CMS began disclosing weekend staffing of all nurses, as well as staff turnover data for all nurses and administrators, on the Nursing Home Compare website. CMS also now incorporates this data into its Five-Star Quality ratings for SNFs and LTC facilities. This data is adjusted based on a facility's case mixture and evaluated on a quarterly basis. This data was included in theOctober 2022 refresh of the Nursing Home Care Compare website as well, in addition to increasing the thresholds for quality measures reported on the Nursing Home Care Compare website based on average improvement over prior quality measures. In January of 2023, CMS updated the Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System's Technical Users' Guide. As explained in the latest update to this guide, CMS will be auditing schizophrenia coding within the MDS reported to CMS, with adjustments to quality ratings based on any inaccuracies in this schizophrenia-related data captured in the MDS. These scoring adjustments for inaccurate schizophrenia-related data reporting include: (1) downgrading the overall quality measure and long-stay quality measure ratings to one star for a period of six months (thus lowering the facility's total star rating by one entire star); (2) suppressing the short-stay quality measure rating for six months; and (3) suppressing the long-stay antipsychotic quality measure for a period of 12 months. Additionally, CMS will not display citations that a facility has informally disputed on the Nursing Home Care Compare website. The outcome of such citations will not be included in the calculation of a facility's star rating until the dispute is completed and the underlying survey considered final. CMS also published the star rating cut point table in January of 2023 for that month's refresh of the Nursing Home Care Compare website data, disclosing the points needed for each star rating within every state. State Legislation Concerning Nursing Home Supervision -California passed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 35, which changes the limitations, or "caps," on non-economic damages that can be awarded in medical negligence cases filed against healthcare providers (including skilled nursing and long-term care facilities). Beginning onJanuary 1, 2023 , non-economic damages (i.e. pain and suffering) available to plaintiffs suing healthcare providers in medical malpractice and professional negligence cases will be increased from$0.25 million to$0.35 million , and will then increase by$0.04 million per year over the following ten years up to a$0.75 million cap. Once the limit reaches$0.75 million , a 2% annual inflationary adjustment will attach beginning onJanuary 1, 2034 . In wrongful death cases that arise from claims of medical malpractice and professional negligence, the cap on non-economic damages will increase from$0.25 million to$0.50 million onJanuary 1, 2023 , and increase every year thereafter for ten years until the cap on non-economic damages in such cases is$1.0 million ; thereafter, this cap will also be subject to an annual 2% increase to reflect changes in the cost of living. The caps are separate as to each claim, meaning that there is one cap for negligence and one cap for wrongful death. The new limits on non-economic damages apply prospectively to lawsuits filed on and afterJanuary 1, 2023 . OnSeptember 27, 2022 ,California's Governor signed into law AB 1502, also known as the Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership and Management Reform Act of 2022. Expected to take effect onJuly 1, 2023 , this law will affect new license applications for SNFs. AB 1502 increases the oversight authority of theCalifornia Department of Public Health , and changes several provisions regarding SNF licensing in theState of California . First, the law eliminates previous regulatory provisions that permitted SNFs to operate in advance of receiving their formal license from the State. AB 1502 also requires SNF license applicants to disclose additional information to theDepartment of Public Health in connection with a license application and requires theDepartment of Public Health to consider more data regarding the applicant's prior operations before issuing it a license. This data includes, but is not limited to: prior citations; sanctions imposed by CMS; legal proceedings commenced by other State or Federal authorities; findings made regarding the applicant by agencies or courts; and actions taken against other facilities owned, operated, or managed by the applicant. The same analysis described above is intended to apply to applications for a change in ownership or a change in management of a skilled nursing facility. AB 1502 authorizes theDepartment of Public Health to impose civil penalties of up to$0.01 million , and other enforcement action as appropriate, upon applicants that fail to comply with the law's requirements. 50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Monitoring Compliance in Our Facilities
Governmental agencies and other authorities periodically inspect our independent operating facilities to assess compliance with various standards, rules and regulations. The robust regulatory and enforcement environment continues to impact healthcare providers, especially in connection with responses to any alleged noncompliance identified in periodic surveys and other inspections by governmental authorities. Unannounced surveys or inspections generally occur at least annually and may also follow a government agency's receipt of a complaint about a facility. Facilities must pass these inspections to maintain licensure under state law, to obtain or maintain certification under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, to continue participation in theVeterans Administration program at some facilities, and to comply with provider contracts with managed care clients at many facilities. From time to time, our independent operating subsidiaries, like others in the healthcare industry, may receive notices from federal and state regulatory agencies of an alleged failure to substantially comply with applicable standards, rules or regulations. These notices may require corrective action, may impose civil monetary penalties for noncompliance, and may threaten or impose other operating restrictions on SNFs such as admission holds, provisional skilled nursing license, or increased staffing requirements. If our independent operating subsidiaries fail to comply with these directives or otherwise fail to comply substantially with licensure and certification laws, rules and regulations, the facility could lose its certification as a Medicare or Medicaid provider, or lose its license permitting operation in the State. Facilities with otherwise acceptable regulatory histories generally are normally given an opportunity to correct deficiencies and continue their participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs by a certain date, usually within six months; however, although where denial of payment remedies are asserted, such interim remedies go into effect much sooner. Facilities with deficiencies that immediately jeopardize patient health and safety and those that are classified as poor performing facilities, however, may not be given an opportunity to correct their deficiencies prior to the imposition of remedies and other enforcement actions. Moreover, facilities with poor regulatory histories continue to be classified by CMS as poor performing facilities notwithstanding any intervening change in ownership, unless the new owner obtains a new Medicare provider agreement instead of assuming the facility's existing agreement. However, new owners nearly always assume the existing Medicare provider agreement due to the difficulty and time delays generally associated with obtaining new Medicare certifications, especially in previously certified locations with sub-par operating histories. Accordingly, facilities that have poor regulatory histories before acquisition by our independent operating subsidiaries and that develop new deficiencies after acquisition are more likely to have sanctions imposed upon them by CMS or state regulators. In addition, CMS has increased its focus on facilities with a history of serious or sustained quality of care problems through the special focus facility (SFF) initiative. A facility's administrators and owners are notified when it is identified as a SFF. This information is also provided to the general public. Local state survey agencies recommend to CMS that facilities be placed on special focus status. SFFs receive heightened scrutiny and more frequent regulatory surveys. Failure to improve the quality of care can result in fines and termination from participation in Medicare and Medicaid. A facility "graduates" from the program once it demonstrates significant improvements in quality of care that are continued over a defined period of time. OnOctober 21, 2022 , CMS issued a Memorandum identifying the changes it intends to make in connection with the oversight of those facilities that fall under the SFF Program. These proposed measures included increased penalties for SFFs that fail to improve their performance upon further inspection by CMS, increasing the standards SFFs must meet to graduate from the SFF program, maintaining heightened oversight of any SFF for a period of three years after it graduates and increasing the technical assistance CMS provides to SFFs. The CMS Memorandum also identifies grants that will be available to aid in the hiring, training and education of personnel involved in resident care, including licensed practical nurses and registered nurses. In addition to the communication from CMS, theWhite House also issued a fact sheet covering these same issues onOctober 21, 2022 . The fact sheet further identified measures theBiden-Harris Administration is taking to increase staffing requirements, halt illegal or improper debt collection activities, increase transparency in facility ownership and operation (including SNF performance), and tie reimbursement to the quality of performance. 51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Sanctions such as denial of payment for new admissions often are scheduled to go into effect before surveyors return to verify compliance. Generally, if the surveyors confirm that the facility is in compliance upon their return, the sanctions never take effect. However, if they determine that the facility is not in compliance, the denial of payment goes into effect retroactive to the date given in the original notice. This possibility sometimes leaves affected operators, including our independent subsidiaries, with the difficult task of deciding whether to continue accepting patients after the potential denial of payment date, thus risking the retroactive denial of revenue associated with those patients' care if the operators are later found to be out of compliance, or simply refusing admissions from the potential denial of payment date until the facility is actually found to be in compliance. In the past and from time to time, some of our independent operating subsidiaries have been or will be in denial of payment status due to findings of continued regulatory deficiencies, resulting in an actual loss of revenue associated with Medicare and Medicaid patients admitted after the denial of payment date. Additional sanctions could ensue and, if imposed, could include various remedies up to and including decertification. CMS has undertaken several initiatives to increase or intensify Medicaid and Medicare survey and enforcement activities, including federal oversight of state actions. CMS is taking steps to focus more survey and enforcement efforts on facilities with findings of substandard care or repeat violations of Medicaid and Medicare standards and to identify multi-facility providers with patterns of noncompliance. CMS is also increasing its oversight of state survey agencies and requiring state agencies to use enforcement sanctions and remedies more promptly when substandard care or repeat violations are identified, to investigate complaints more promptly, and to survey facilities more consistently.
Regulations Regarding Financial Arrangements
We are also subject to federal and state laws that regulate financial
arrangement by and between healthcare providers, such as the federal and state
anti-kickback laws, the Stark laws, and various state anti-referral laws.
The Social Security Act prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation, or receipt of any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce the referral of an individual, in return for recommending, or to arrange for, the referral of an individual for any item or service payable under any federal healthcare program, including Medicare or Medicaid. The OIG has issued regulations that create "safe harbors" for certain conduct and business relationships that are deemed protected under the Social Security Act. In order to receive safe harbor protection, all of the requirements of a safe harbor must be met. The fact that a given business arrangement does not fall within one of these safe harbors, however, does not render the arrangement per se illegal. Business arrangements of healthcare service providers that fail to satisfy the applicable safe harbor criteria, if investigated, will be evaluated based upon all facts and circumstances and risk increased scrutiny and possible sanctions by enforcement authorities. Violations of the Social Security Act can result in inflation-adjusted criminal penalties of more than$0.1 million and ten years imprisonment. It can also result in inflation-adjusted civil monetary penalties of more than$0.1 million per violation and an assessment of up to three times the total amount of remuneration offered, paid, solicited, or received. It may also result in an individual's or organization's exclusion from future participation in federal healthcare programs. State Medicaid programs are required to enact an anti-kickback statute. Many states in which our independent operating subsidiaries operate have adopted or are considering similar legislative proposals, some of which extend beyond the Medicaid program, to prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration for the referral of patients regardless of the source of payment for the care. We believe that business practices of providers and financial relationships between providers have become subject to increased scrutiny as healthcare reform efforts continue on the federal and state levels. 52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Additionally, the "Stark Law" of the Social Security Act provides that a physician may not refer a Medicare or Medicaid patient for a "designated health service" to an entity with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship unless the financial arrangement meets an exception under the Stark Law or its regulations. Designated health services include inpatient and outpatient hospital services, PT, OT, SLP, durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies, diagnostic imaging, enteral and parenteral feeding and supplies and home health services. Under the Stark Law, a "financial relationship" is defined as an ownership or investment interest or a compensation arrangement. If such a financial relationship exists and does not meet aStark Law exception, the entity is prohibited from submitting or claiming payment under the Medicare or Medicaid programs or from collecting from the patient or other payor. Many of the compensation arrangements exceptions permit referrals if, among other things, the arrangement is set forth in a written agreement signed by the parties, the compensation to be paid is set in advance, is consistent with fair market value and is not determined in a manner that takes into account the volume or value of any referrals or other business generated between the parties. Exceptions may have other requirements. Any funds collected for an item or service resulting from a referral that violates the Stark Law are not eligible for payment by federal healthcare programs and must be repaid to Medicare or Medicaid, any other third-party payor, and the patient. Violations of the Stark Law may result in the imposition of civil monetary penalties, including, treble damages. Individuals and organizations may also be excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs forStark Law violations. Many states have enacted healthcare provider referral laws that go beyond physician self-referrals or apply to a greater range of services than just the designated health services under the Stark Law.
Regulations Regarding Patient Record Confidentiality
Health care providers are also subject to laws and regulations enacted to protect the confidentiality of patient health information. For example, HHS has issued rules pursuant to HIPAA, including the Health Information Technology forEconomic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act which governs our use and disclosure of protected health information of patients. We have established policies and procedures to comply with HIPAA privacy and security requirements at our independent operating subsidiaries. Our independent operating subsidiaries have adopted and implemented HIPAA compliance plans, which we believe comply with the HIPAA privacy and security regulations. The HIPAA privacy and security regulations have and will continue to impose significant costs on our independent operating subsidiaries in order to comply with these standards. There are numerous other laws and legislative and regulatory initiatives at the federal and state levels addressing privacy and security concerns. Our independent operating subsidiaries are also subject to any federal or state privacy-related laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA. These laws vary and could impose additional penalties for privacy and security breaches. Healthcare entities are also required to afford patients with certain rights of access to their health information under HIPAA and the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act).The Office of Civil Rights , the agency responsible for HIPAA enforcement, has targeted investigative and enforcement efforts on violations of patients' rights of access, including denial of access to medical records, imposing significant fines for violations largely initiated from patient complaints.The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology can also investigate and impose separate penalties for information blocking violations under the Cures Act.
Antitrust Laws
We are also subject to federal and state antitrust laws. Enforcement of the antitrust laws against healthcare providers is common, and antitrust liability may arise in a wide variety of circumstances, including third party contracting, physician relations, joint venture, merger, affiliation and acquisition activities. In some respects, the application of federal and state antitrust laws to healthcare is still evolving, and enforcement activity by federal and state agencies appears to be increasing. . OnFebruary 3, 2023 , theDOJ 'sAntitrust Division withdrew its support from three policies that had been jointly created by theDOJ and theFederal Trade Commission in 1993, 1996, and 2011 which previously created longstanding "antitrust safety zones" for the healthcare industry. After withdrawing its support from the policies, theDOJ announced it would take a case-by-case enforcement approach to evaluate conduct in the healthcare industry, citing that the previous policies were outdated and overly permissive. With no further guidance provided by theDOJ , during this uncertainty, healthcare providers and insurance and managed care organizations may be subject to an investigation by a governmental agency charged with the enforcement of antitrust laws, or may be subject to administrative or judicial action by a federal or state agency or a private party. Violators of the antitrust laws could be subject to criminal and civil enforcement by federal and state agencies, as well as by private litigants.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Our independent operating subsidiaries must also comply with theADA , and similar state and local laws to the extent that the facilities are "public accommodations" as defined in those laws. The obligation to comply with theADA and other similar laws is an ongoing obligation, and the independent operating subsidiaries continue to assess their facilities relative toADA compliance and make appropriate modifications as needed. 53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Qualification
We are electing for Standard Bearer to be taxed as a REIT forU.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with its taxable year endedDecember 31, 2022 . Standard Bearer's qualification as a REIT will depend upon its ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of its gross income, the composition and value of its assets, distribution levels to its shareholders and the concentration of ownership of its capital stock. We believe that Standard Bearer is organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code and that its manner of operation has and will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.
REGULATIONS SPECIFIC TO SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES
As previously mentioned, senior living services revenue (approximately 2.1% of total revenue) is primarily derived from private pay residents, with a small portion of senior living revenue derived from Medicaid funds. Thus, some of the regulations discussed above applicable to Medicaid providers, also apply to senior living. However, the following provides a brief overview of the regulatory framework applicable specifically to senior living. A majority of states provide, or are approved to provide, Medicaid payments for personal care and medical services to some residents in licensed senior living communities under waivers granted by or under Medicaid state plans approved by CMS. State Medicaid programs control costs for senior living and other home and community-based services by various means such as restrictive financial and functional eligibility standards, enrollment limits and waiting lists. Because rates paid to senior living community operators are generally lower than rates paid to SNF operators, some states use Medicaid funding of senior living services as a means of lowering the cost of services for residents who may not need the higher level of health services provided in SNFs. States that administer Medicaid programs for services in senior living communities are responsible for monitoring the services at, and physical conditions of, the participating communities. As a result of the growth of senior living in recent years, states have adopted licensing standards applicable to senior living communities. Most state licensing standards apply to senior living communities regardless of whether they accept Medicaid funding. CMS has continued to commence a series of actions to increase its oversight of state quality assurance programs for senior living communities and has provided guidance and technical assistance to states to improve their ability to monitor and improve the quality of services paid through Medicaid waiver programs. CMS is encouraging state Medicaid programs to expand their use of home and community-based services as alternatives to facility-based services, pursuant to provisions of the ACA, and other authorities, through the use of several programs. The types of laws and statutes affecting the regulatory landscape of the post-acute industry continue to expand. In addition to this changing regulatory environment, federal, state and local officials are increasingly focusing their efforts on the enforcement of these laws. In order to operate our businesses, we must comply with federal, state and local laws relating to licensure, delivery and adequacy of medical care, distribution of pharmaceuticals, equipment, personnel, operating policies, fire prevention, rate-setting, billing and reimbursement, building codes and environmental protection. Additionally, we must also adhere to anti-kickback statues, physician referral laws, theADA and safety and health standards set by theOSHA Administration . Changes in the law or new interpretations of existing laws may have an adverse impact on our methods and costs of doing business. Our independent operating subsidiaries are also subject to various regulations and licensing requirements promulgated by state and local health and social service agencies and other regulatory authorities. Requirements vary from state to state and these requirements can affect, among other things, personnel education and training, patient and personnel records, services, staffing levels, monitoring of patient wellness, patient furnishings, housekeeping services, dietary requirements, emergency plans and procedures, certification and licensing of staff prior to beginning employment and patient rights. These laws and regulations could limit our ability to expand into new markets and to expand the services provided by independent operating subsidiaries in existing markets. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS We believe we exist to dignify and transform post-acute care. We set out a strategy to achieve our goal of ensuring our patients are receiving the best possible care through our ability to acquire, integrate and improve our operations. Our results serve as a strong indicator that our strategy is working and our transformation is underway. 54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Our total revenue for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 increased$173.4 million , or 24.3%, while our diluted GAAP earnings per share grew by 18.0%, from$0.89 to$1.05 , compared to the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 . Over the quarter, we have continued to make progress on targeted initiatives related to increasing occupancy in our mature facilities, acquiring new skilled nursing operations and integrating them with our proven cultural and operational principles and most importantly, attracting and developing our people. Our combined Same Facilities and Transitioning Facilities occupancy increased by 4.3% compared to the same period in 2022. We saw a recovery in our census starting in the first quarter of 2021, which has continued through the first quarter of 2023. See Recent Activities for our operational update. During the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , we added 19 new operations. We are excited to be adding new operations in several geographies including 17 new operations inCalifornia . As part of theseCalifornia facilities, we inherited a solid operational foundation, including an amazing group of highly skilled team members who will continue to have an impact on our culture and organization for years to come. We look forward to working together to help each operation reach its full clinical and financial potential. Our strength remains in our operating model, which empowers each operator to form their own market-specific strategy and to adjust to the needs of their local medical communities, including methods for attracting new healthcare professionals into our workforce and retaining and developing existing staff. Despite continued labor pressures, there are positive trends on both turnover and agency usage in some of our markets. The following table sets forth details of operating results for our revenue, expenses and earnings, and their respective components, as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
2023 2022
REVENUE:
Service revenue 99.4 % 99.4 %
Rental revenue 0.6 0.6
TOTAL REVENUE 100.0 % 100.0 %
Expenses:
Cost of services 78.5 77.9
Rent-cost of services 5.3 5.0
General and administrative expense 5.9 5.3
Depreciation and amortization 1.9 2.1
TOTAL EXPENSES 91.6 90.3
Income from operations 8.4 9.7
Other income (expense):
Interest expense (0.2) (0.3)
Other income (expense) 0.6 (0.1)
Other income (expense), net 0.4 (0.4)
Income before provision for income taxes 8.8 9.3
Provision for income taxes 2.1 2.2
NET INCOME 6.7 7.1
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests - -
Net income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc. 6.7 % 7.1 %
55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022
SEGMENT INCOME(1) (In thousands)
Skilled services $ 113,345 $ 98,256
Standard Bearer(2) $ 7,219 $ 6,900
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES:
PERFORMANCE METRICS
Adjusted EBT $ 86,344 $ 75,246
EBITDA $ 91,870 $ 84,038
Adjusted EBITDA $ 99,785 $ 92,729
FFO for Standard Bearer $ 13,185 $ 11,921
VALUATION METRICS
Adjusted EBITDAR $ 146,422
(1) Segment income represents operating results of the reportable segments
excluding gain and loss on sale of assets, real estate insurance recoveries and
losses, impairment charges and provision for income taxes. Included in segment
income for Standard Bearer for the three months ended March 31, 2023 are
expenses for intercompany management fees between Standard Bearer and the
Service Center and intercompany interest expense. Segment income is reconciled
to the Consolidated Statement of Income in Note 7, Business Segments in Notes to
Interim Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(2) Standard Bearer segment income includes rental revenue from Ensign
affiliated tenants and expenses.
The following discussion includes references to Adjusted EBT, EBITDA, Adjusted
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDAR and Funds from Operations (FFO) which are non-GAAP
financial measures (collectively, the Non-GAAP Financial Measures). Regulation
G, Conditions for Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures, and other provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), define and
prescribe the conditions for use of certain non-GAAP financial information.
These Non-GAAP Financial Measures are used in addition to and in conjunction
with results presented in accordance with GAAP. These Non-GAAP Financial
Measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures.
These Non-GAAP Financial Measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects
of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying
reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more
complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business.
We believe the presentation of certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures are useful to
investors and other external users of our financial statements regarding our
results of operations because:
•they are widely used by investors and analysts in our industry as a
supplemental measure to evaluate the overall performance of companies in our
industry without regard to items such as other income (expense), net and
depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to
company depending on the book value of assets, capital structure and the method
by which assets were acquired; and
•they help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from
period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure and asset base
from our operating results.
We use the Non-GAAP Financial Measures:
•as measurements of our operating performance to assist us in comparing our
operating performance on a consistent basis;
•to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business;
•to assess the value of a potential acquisition;
•to assess the value of a transformed operation's performance;
•to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational strategies; and
•to compare our operating performance to that of our competitors.
We use certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures to compare the operating performance
of each operation. These measures are useful in this regard because they do not
include such costs as other expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
expense, which may vary from period-to-period depending upon various factors,
including the method used to finance operations, the amount of debt that we have
incurred, whether an operation is owned or leased, the date of acquisition of a
facility or business, and the tax law of the state in which a business unit
operates.
56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We also establish compensation programs and bonuses for our leaders that are
partially based upon the achievement of Adjusted EBITDAR targets.
Despite the importance of these measures in analyzing our underlying business,
designing incentive compensation and for our goal setting, the Non-GAAP
Financial Measures have no standardized meaning defined by GAAP. Therefore,
certain of our Non-GAAP Financial Measures have limitations as analytical tools,
and they should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis
of our results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations
are:
•they do not reflect our current or future cash requirements for capital
expenditures or contractual commitments;
•they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital
needs;
•they do not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to
service interest or principal payments, on our debt;
•they do not reflect rent expenses, which are necessary to operate our leased
operations, in the case of Adjusted EBITDAR;
•they do not reflect any income tax payments we may be required to make;
•although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and
•other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than
we do, which may limit their usefulness as comparative measures.
We compensate for these limitations by using them only to supplement net income on a basis prepared in accordance with GAAP in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. Management strongly encourages investors to review our consolidated financial statements in their entirety and to not rely on any single financial measure. Because these Non-GAAP Financial Measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' Non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. These Non-GAAP Financial Measures should not be considered a substitute for, nor superior to, financial results and measures determined or calculated in accordance with GAAP. We strongly urge you to review the reconciliation of income from operations to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures in the table below, along with our Interim Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
We use the following Non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to
investors as key valuation and operating performance measures:
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Adjusted EBT
We adjust income before provision for income taxes (Adjusted EBT) when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance, in the case of Adjusted EBT. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBT, when combined with income before provision for income taxes and GAAP net income attributable toThe Ensign Group, Inc. , is beneficial to an investor's complete understanding of our operating performance. We use this performance measure as an indicator of business performance, as well as for operational planning, decision-making purposes and to determine compensation in our executive compensation plan.
Adjusted EBT is income before provision for income taxes adjusted for non-core
business items, which for the reported periods includes, to the extent
applicable:
•stock-based compensation expense;
•legal finding;
•acquisition related costs;
•costs incurred related to new systems implementation; and
•depreciation and amortization of patient base intangible assets.
57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
EBITDA
We believe EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because it helps investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our asset base (depreciation and amortization expense) from our operating results.
We calculate EBITDA as net income, adjusted for net losses attributable to
noncontrolling interest, before (a) other income (expense), net, (b) provision
for income taxes, and (c) depreciation and amortization.
Adjusted EBITDA
We adjust EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance, in the case of Adjusted EBITDA. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with EBITDA and GAAP net income attributable toThe Ensign Group, Inc. , is beneficial to an investor's complete understanding of our operating performance.
Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for the same non-core business items as
listed in Adjusted EBT, except for depreciation and amortization of patient base
intangible assets.
Funds from Operations (FFO) We consider FFO to be a useful supplemental measure of the operating performance of Standard Bearer. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance withU.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as evidenced by the provision for depreciation. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many real estate investors and analysts have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. In response, theNational Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs, which excludes historical cost depreciation from net income. We define (in accordance with the definition used by NAREIT) FFO to consist of Standard Bearer segment income, excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gains or losses from the sale of real estate, insurance recoveries related to real estate and impairment of depreciable real estate assets.
VALUATION MEASURE
Adjusted EBITDAR
We use Adjusted EBITDAR as one measure in determining the value of prospective acquisitions. It is also a commonly used measure by our management, research analysts and investors, to compare the enterprise value of different companies in the healthcare industry, without regard to differences in capital structures and leasing arrangements. Adjusted EBITDAR is a financial valuation measure that is not specified in GAAP. This measure is not displayed as a performance measure as it excludes rent expense, which is a normal and recurring operating expense, and is therefore presented only for the current period.
The adjustments made and previously described in the computation of Adjusted
EBITDA are also made when computing Adjusted EBITDAR. We calculate Adjusted
EBITDAR by excluding rent-cost of services from Adjusted EBITDA.
We believe the use of Adjusted EBITDAR allows the investor to compare
operational results of companies who have operating and capital leases. A
significant portion of capital lease expenditures are recorded in interest,
whereas operating lease expenditures are recorded in rent expense.
The table below reconciles income before provision for income taxes to Adjusted
EBT for the periods presented:
58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022
Consolidated statements of income data: (In thousands)
Income before provision for income taxes $
78,382
Stock-based compensation 6,573 5,167 Legal finding(a) 67 3,626 Acquisition related costs(b) 460 106 Costs incurred related to new systems implementation 815 65 Depreciation and amortization - patient base(c) 47 56 ADJUSTED EBT$ 86,344 $ 75,246 (a) Legal finding against our ancillary services subsidiary, which includes the portion attributable to non-controlling interests. (b) Costs incurred to acquire operations that are not capitalizable. (c) Included in depreciation and amortization are amortization expenses related to patient base intangible assets at newly acquired skilled nursing and senior living facilities.
The table below reconciles net income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDAR for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022
Consolidated statements of income data: (In thousands)
Net income $ 59,969 $ 50,088
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 117 (252)
Add: Other (income) expense, net (3,507) 2,884
Provision for income taxes 18,413 16,138
Depreciation and amortization 17,112 14,676
EBITDA $ 91,870 $ 84,038
Stock-based compensation 6,573 5,167
Legal finding(a) 67 3,353
Acquisition related costs(b) 460 106
Costs incurred related to new systems implementation 815 65
ADJUSTED EBITDA $ 99,785 $ 92,729
Rent-cost of services 46,637 35,762
ADJUSTED EBITDAR $ 146,422
(a) Legal finding against our ancillary services subsidiary, which excludes the
portion attributable to non-controlling interests.
(b) Costs incurred to acquire operations that are not capitalizable.
Three Months Ended
2022
The following table sets forth details of operating results for our revenue and
earnings, and their respective components, by our reportable segment for the
periods indicated.
59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
Skilled Standard
services Bearer All Other Eliminations Consolidated
Total Revenue $ 850,923 $ 19,717 $ 37,096 $ (20,895) $ 886,841
Total expenses, including other income,
net 737,578 12,498 79,278 (20,895) 808,459
Segment income (loss) 113,345 7,219 (42,182) - 78,382
Income before provision for income taxes $ 78,382
Three Months Ended
Skilled Standard
services Bearer All Other Eliminations Consolidated
Total Revenue $ 686,771 $ 17,193 $ 27,330 $ (17,849) $ 713,445
Total expenses, including other income,
net 588,515 10,293 66,260 (17,849) 647,219
Segment income (loss) 98,256 6,900 (38,930) - 66,226
Income before provision for income taxes $ 66,226
Our total revenue increased by $173.4 million , or 24.3%, compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2022 . The increase in revenue was driven by an increase
in occupancy from our skilled services operations, growth in skilled average
daily census and the impact of acquisitions. Total revenue from operations
acquired on or subsequent to April 1, 2022 increased our consolidated revenue by
$102.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2023 , when compared to
the same period in 2022. In addition, we recorded $26.4 million of state relief
revenue in the first quarter of 2023 compared to $17.6 million in the same
period in 2022, which directly correlated to the additional COVID-19 and related
labor expenses incurred. All state relief revenue is included in Medicaid
revenue.
Skilled Services
REVENUE
The following table presents the skilled services revenue and key performance
metrics by category during the three months ended
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022 Change % Change
TOTAL FACILITY RESULTS: (Dollars in thousands)
Skilled services revenue $ 850,923 $ 686,771 $ 164,152 23.9 %
Number of facilities at period end 253 215 38 17.7 %
Number of campuses at period end* 26 25 1 4.0 %
Actual patient days 2,047,705 1,695,964 351,741 20.7 %
Occupancy percentage - Operational beds 77.9 % 74.2 % 3.7 %
Skilled mix by nursing days 32.3 % 33.7 % (1.4) %
Skilled mix by nursing revenue 52.7 % 54.3 % (1.6) %
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022 Change % Change
SAME FACILITY RESULTS:(1) (Dollars in thousands)
Skilled services revenue $ 682,023 $ 625,315 $ 56,708 9.1 %
Number of facilities at period end 189 189 - - %
Number of campuses at period end* 24 24 - - %
Actual patient days 1,610,815 1,524,145 86,670 5.7 %
Occupancy percentage - Operational beds 78.8 % 74.6 % 4.2 %
Skilled mix by nursing days 33.8 % 34.5 % (0.7) %
Skilled mix by nursing revenue 53.8 % 55.1 % (1.3) %
60
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022 Change % Change
TRANSITIONING FACILITY RESULTS:(2) (Dollars in
thousands)
Skilled services revenue$ 61,767 $ 54,798 $ 6,969 12.7 % Number of facilities at period end 22 22 - - % Number of campuses at period end* 1 1 - - % Actual patient days 161,420 149,689 11,731 7.8 % Occupancy percentage - Operational beds 76.2 % 70.8 % 5.4 % Skilled mix by nursing days 23.9 % 25.4 % (1.5) % Skilled mix by nursing revenue 41.9 % 45.3 % (3.4) % Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 2022 Change % Change RECENTLY ACQUIRED FACILITY RESULTS:(3) (Dollars in
thousands)
Skilled services revenue$ 107,133 $ 6,658 $ 100,475 NM Number of facilities at period end 42 4 38 NM Number of campuses at period end* 1 - 1 NM Actual patient days 275,470 22,130 253,340 NM
Occupancy percentage - Operational beds 74.3 % 74.6 %
NM Skilled mix by nursing days 28.8 % 36.4 % NM Skilled mix by nursing revenue 52.0 % 52.9 % NM *Campus represents a facility that offers both skilled nursing and senior living services. Revenue and expenses related to skilled nursing and senior living services have been allocated and recorded in the respective operating segment. Since the second quarter of 2022, we converted two skilled nursing facilities into campuses. (1)Same Facility results represent all facilities purchased prior toJanuary 1, 2020 . (2)Transitioning Facility results represent all facilities purchased fromJanuary 1, 2020 toDecember 31, 2021 . (3)Recently Acquired Facility (Acquisitions) results represent all facilities purchased on or subsequent toJanuary 1, 2022 . Skilled services revenue increased by$164.2 million , or 23.9%, compared to the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 . The increases in skilled services revenue were across all payer types including increases in Medicaid revenue of$83.8 million , or 27.3%, Medicare revenue of$39.3 million , or 18.9%, managed care revenue of$28.9 million , or 22.6% and private revenue of$12.2 million or 28.4%. The increase in skilled services revenue was primarily driven by strong performance across our skilled services operations as our census continued to recover in the first quarter of 2023, growth in skilled census, state specific relief programs and acquisitions. Our consolidated occupancy increased by 3.7% during the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. Revenue in our Same Facilities increased by$56.7 million , or 9.1% due to increased occupancy and revenue per patient day. Our diligent efforts to strengthen our partnerships with various managed care organizations, hospitals and the local communities we operate in increased our managed care days by 9.0%, resulting in an increase in managed care revenue of 11.9%. Revenue generated by our Transitioning Facilities increased by$7.0 million , or 12.7%, primarily due to improved occupancy growth and increase in revenue per patient day. Our private days, managed care skilled days and Medicaid days increased by 26.0%, 11.6% and 7.5%, respectively, demonstrating our ability to focus on increasing occupancy across payer types. Skilled services revenue generated by facilities purchased on or subsequent toJanuary 1, 2022 (Recently Acquired Facilities) increased by approximately$100.5 million compared to the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 . We acquired 39 operations betweenApril 1, 2022 andMarch 31, 2023 across six states. 61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In the future, if we acquire additional turnaround or start-up operations, we
expect to see lower occupancy rates and skilled mix, and these metrics are
expected to vary from period to period based upon the maturity of the facilities
within our portfolio. Historically, we have generally experienced lower
occupancy rates, lower skilled mix at Recently Acquired Facilities and
therefore, we anticipate generally lower overall occupancy during years of
growth. Included in our metrics for Recently Acquired Facilities are 17
facilities we acquired that are matured and have higher occupancy rates, higher
skilled mix days and skilled mix revenue.
The following table reflects the change in skilled nursing average daily revenue
rates by payor source, excluding services that are not covered by the daily rate
(1):
Three Months Ended March 31,
Same Facility Transitioning Acquisitions Total
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
SKILLED NURSING AVERAGE DAILY REVENUE RATES:
Medicare $ 713.34 $ 696.47 $ 679.63 $ 660.41 $ 744.78 $ 654.84 $ 715.64 $ 693.28
Managed care 518.22 505.14 528.34 497.72 526.01 449.63 519.43 504.23
Other skilled 602.42 573.13 490.47 542.21 485.83 416.91 585.02 562.51
Total skilled revenue 610.08 598.96 605.05 593.98 638.23 452.56 613.16 596.57
Medicaid 267.48 258.00 264.27 241.77 236.54 231.89 262.78 255.97
Private and other payors 264.33 251.03 259.14 256.43 246.19 185.27 261.40 251.36
Total skilled nursing revenue
(1) These rates exclude state relief funding and include sequestration reversal
of 2% in the three months ended
Our Medicare daily rates at Same Facilities and Transitioning Facilities increased by 2.4% and 2.9%, respectively, compared to the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 . The increase is attributable to the 2.7% net market basket increase that became effective inOctober 2022 , offset by the reinstatement of the 2% sequestration starting in the third quarter of 2022. In addition, we have seen a shift to higher acuity patients. Our average Medicaid rates increased 2.7% due to state reimbursement increases and our participation in supplemental Medicaid payment programs and quality improvement programs in various states. Medicaid rates exclude the amount of state relief revenue we recorded. Payor Sources as a Percentage of Skilled Nursing Services. We use our skilled mix as measures of the quality of reimbursements we receive at our affiliated skilled nursing facilities over various periods.
The following tables set forth our percentage of skilled nursing patient revenue
and days by payor source:
Three Months Ended March 31,
Same Facility Transitioning Acquisitions Total
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
PERCENTAGE OF SKILLED NURSING REVENUE
Medicare 25.3 % 28.1 % 25.1 % 28.3 % 32.7 % 8.6 % 26.2 % 27.9 %
Managed care 20.1 19.4 13.3 12.5 13.7 14.3 18.8 18.8
Other skilled 8.4 7.6 3.5 4.5 5.6 30.0 7.7 7.6
Skilled Mix 53.8 55.1 41.9 45.3 52.0 52.9 52.7 54.3
Private and other payors 7.1 6.7 8.6 7.5 7.4 1.0 7.3 6.7
Medicaid 39.1 38.2 49.5 47.2 40.6 46.1 40.0 39.0
TOTAL SKILLED NURSING 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31,
Same Facility Transitioning Acquisitions Total
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
PERCENTAGE OF SKILLED NURSING DAYS
Medicare 13.6 % 15.2 % 12.8 % 14.3 % 15.5 % 4.1 % 13.8 % 14.9 %
Managed care 14.8 14.4 8.7 8.4 9.2 9.9 13.6 13.8
Other skilled 5.4 4.9 2.4 2.7 4.1 22.4 4.9 5.0
Skilled Mix 33.8 34.5 23.9 25.4 28.8 36.4 32.3 33.7
Private and other payors 10.2 10.0 11.4 9.7 10.6 1.7 10.4 9.9
Medicaid 56.0 55.5 64.7 64.9 60.6 61.9 57.3 56.4
TOTAL SKILLED NURSING 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of Services
The following table sets forth total cost of services for our Skilled services
segment for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, Change
2023 2022 $ %
Cost of service $ 670,669 $ 534,174 $ 136,495 25.6 %
Revenue percentage 78.8 % 77.8 % 1.0 %
Cost of services related to our skilled services segment increased by $136.5
million , or 25.6%. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to
78.8% from 77.8% due to costs related to new acquisitions, specifically agency
costs, with additional impact from delayed collections. As a result of the labor
environment, our operations experienced staff hiring and retention constraints,
which resulted in additional overtime, benefits and bonuses to our staff and
higher use of contracted labor.
Standard Bearer
Three Months Ended March 31, Change
2023 2022 $ %
(Dollars in thousands)
Rental revenue generated from third-party
tenants $ 3,786 $ 3,768 $ 18 0.5 %
Rental revenue generated from Ensign
affiliated operations 15,931 13,425 2,506 18.7
TOTAL RENTAL REVENUE $ 19,717 $ 17,193 $ 2,524 14.7 %
Segment income 7,219 6,900 319 4.6
Depreciation and amortization 5,966 5,021 945 18.8
FFO $ 13,185 $ 11,921 $ 1,264 10.6 %
Rental revenue. Our rental revenue, including revenue generated from our
affiliated facilities, increased by $2.5 million , or 14.7%, to $19.7 million ,
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2022 . The increase in revenue is
primarily attributable to eight real estate purchases, as well as annual rent
increases since the three months ended March 31, 2022 .
FFO. Our FFO increased by $1.3 million , or 10.6% to $13.2 million , compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2022 . The increase in rental revenue of $2.5
million is offset by increases in interest expense of $1.0 million as well as
management fee expense of $0.2 million associated with the intercompany
agreements between Standard Bearer and the Service Center.
63
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
All Other Revenue
Our other revenue increased by$9.8 million , or 35.7%, to$37.1 million , compared to the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 . Other revenue for 2023 includes senior living revenue of$18.5 million , revenue from other ancillary services of$16.0 million and sub-rental income of$2.6 million . The increase in other revenue is primarily attributable to our senior living operations' occupancy rates rebounding from COVID-19.
Consolidated Financial Expenses
Rent - cost of services. Our rent - cost of services as a percentage of total revenue increased by 0.3% to 5.3%, primarily due to lease obligations acquired as part of our operational expansions. General and administrative expense - General and administrative expense increased$13.6 million or 35.6%, to$51.9 million . General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue increased by 0.6% to 5.9%. This increase was primarily due to increases in system implementation costs, bonuses due to enhanced performance, our annual leadership conference and headcount due to acquisition activity. Depreciation and amortization - Depreciation and amortization expense increased$2.4 million , or 16.6%, to$17.1 million . This increase was primarily related to the additional depreciation and amortization incurred as a result of our newly acquired operations and capital expenditures. Depreciation and amortization decreased 0.2%, to 1.9%, as a percentage of revenue. Other income (expense), net - Other income (expense), net as a percentage of revenue increased by 0.8% to 0.4%. Other income primarily includes interest income from our investments offset by interest expense related to our debt. During the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , the deferred compensation investment program had a gain of$1.2 million . There is an offsetting expense allocated between cost of services and general and administrative expenses. During the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 , the deferred compensation investment program had a loss of$1.2 million . There is an offsetting reduction in expense allocated between cost of services and general and administrative expenses. Provision for income taxes - Our effective tax rate was 23.5% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 , compared to 24.4% for the same period in 2022. The effective tax rate for both periods is driven by the impact of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation, partially offset by non-deductible expenses including non-deductible compensation. See Note 14, Income Taxes, in the Interim Financial Statements for further discussion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity have historically been derived from our cash flows from operations and long-term debt secured by our real property and our Revolving Credit Facility. Our liquidity as ofMarch 31, 2023 is impacted by cash generated from strong operational performance and increased acquisition and share repurchase activities. Historically, we have primarily financed the majority of our acquisitions through mortgages on our properties, our Revolving Credit Facility and cash generated from operations. Cash paid to fund acquisitions was$33.8 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2022 , and no cash was paid for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 . Total capital expenditures for property and equipment were$26.7 million and$15.8 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We currently have approximately$80.0 million budgeted for renovation projects in 2023. We believe our current cash balances, our cash flow from operations and the amounts available for borrowing under our Revolving Credit Facility will be sufficient to cover our operating needs for at least the next 12 months.
We may, in the future, seek to raise additional capital to fund growth, capital
renovations, operations and other business activities, but such additional
capital may not be available on acceptable terms, on a timely basis, or at all.
Our cash and cash equivalents as ofMarch 31, 2023 consisted of bank term deposits, money market funds andU.S. Treasury bill related investments. In addition, as ofMarch 31, 2023 , we held investments of approximately$102.2 million . We believe our investments that were in an unrealized loss position as ofMarch 31, 2023 do not require an allowance for expected credit losses, nor has any event occurred subsequent to that date that would indicate so. As mentioned above, our primary sources of cash is from our ongoing operations. Our positive cash flows have supported our business and have allowed us to pay regular dividends to our stockholders. We currently anticipate that existing cash and total investments as ofMarch 31, 2023 , along with projected operating cash flows and available financing, will support our normal business operations for the foreseeable future. 64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnJuly 28, 2022 , the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to$20.0 million of our common stock under the program for a period of approximately 12 months fromAugust 2, 2022 . Under this program, we are authorized to repurchase our issued and outstanding common shares from time to time in open-market and privately negotiated transactions and block trades in accordance with federal securities laws. The share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. We did not purchase any shares pursuant to this stock repurchase program during the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 .
The following table presents selected data from our condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2023 2022
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN): (In thousands)
Operating activities $ 48,344 $ 45,874
Investing activities (35,971) (48,240)
Financing activities (1,674) (11,289)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 10,699 (13,655)
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period 316,270 262,201
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 326,969 $ 248,546
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain
non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.
The$2.5 million increase in cash provided by operating activities for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 was primarily due to higher net income offset by changes in working capital. Changes in working capital were driven by timing of collections of accounts receivable.
Investing Activities
Investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures, investment
activities, insurance proceeds and cash used for acquisitions.
The$12.3 million decrease in cash used in investing activities for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022, was primarily due to a decrease in cash used for expansions and capital expenditures of$23.0 million offset by an increase in cash used for investments of$9.2 million .
Financing Activities
Financing cash flows consist primarily of payment of dividends to stockholders,
issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt, payment for share
repurchases and sale of subsidiary shares.
The$9.6 million decrease in cash used in financing activities for the three months endedMarch 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022, was primarily due to$9.9 million of share repurchases as part of our stock repurchase program in 2022, offset by an increase in dividends paid of$0.2 million .
Credit Facility with a Lending Consortium Arranged by Truist
OnApril 8, 2022 , we entered into the Amended Credit Agreement, which increased the amount of the revolving line of credit thereunder to$600.0 million in aggregate principal amount. The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility isApril 8, 2027 and we modified the reference rate from LIBOR to SOFR. Borrowings are supported by a lending consortium arranged by Truist. The interest rates applicable to loans under the Revolving Credit Facility are, at our option, equal to either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% per annum or SOFR plus a margin range from 1.25% to 2.25% per annum, based on the Consolidated Total Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). In addition, we will pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the commitments that will range from 0.20% to 0.40% per annum, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA ratio. 65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans and Promissory Note
As ofMarch 31, 2023 , 23 of our subsidiaries have mortgage loans insured with HUD for an aggregate amount of$152.7 million , which subjects these subsidiaries to HUD oversight and periodic inspections. The mortgage loans bear effective interest rates at a range of 3.1% to 4.2%, including fixed interest rates at a range of 2.4% to 3.3% per annum. In addition to the interest rate, we incur other fees for HUD placement, including but not limited to audit fees. Amounts borrowed under the mortgage loans may be prepaid, subject to prepayment fees of the principal balance on the date of prepayment. For the majority of the loans, during the first three years, the prepayment fee is 10.0% and is reduced by 3.0% in the fourth year of the loan, and reduced by 1.0% per year for years five through ten of the loan. There is no prepayment penalty after year ten. The terms for all the mortgage loans are 25 to 35 years. In addition to the HUD mortgage loans above, one of our subsidiaries has a promissory note that bears a fixed interest rate of 5.3% per annum and has a term of 12 years. The note, which was used for an acquisition, is secured by the real property comprising the facility and the rent, issues and profits thereof, as well as all personal property used in the operation of the facility.
Operating Leases
As ofMarch 31, 2023 , 211 of our facilities are under long-term lease arrangements, of which 96 of the operations are under nine triple-net Master Leases and one stand-alone lease with CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CareTrust). The Master Leases consist of multiple leases, each with its own pool of properties, that have varying maturities and diversity in property geography. Under each master lease, our individual subsidiaries that operate those properties are the tenants and CareTrust's individual subsidiaries that own the properties subject to the Master Leases are the landlords. The rent structure under the Master Leases includes a fixed component, subject to annual escalation equal to the lesser of the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (but not less than zero) or 2.5%. At our option, we can extend the Master Leases for two or three five-year renewal terms beyond the initial term, on the same terms and conditions. If we elect to renew the term of aMaster Lease , the renewal will be effective as to all, but not less than all, of the leased property then subject to the Master Lease. Additionally, four of the 97 facilities leased from CareTrust include an option to purchase that we can exercise starting onDecember 1, 2024 . We also lease certain affiliated facilities and our administrative offices under non-cancelable operating leases, most of which have initial lease terms ranging from five to 20 years and is subject to annual escalation equal to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a stated cap percentage. In addition, we lease certain of our equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms ranging from three to five years. Most of these leases contain renewal options, certain of which involve rent increases. Seventy-eight of our affiliated facilities, excluding the facilities that are operated under the Master Leases from CareTrust, are operated under 12 separate master lease arrangements. Under these master leases, a breach at a single facility could subject one or more of the other affiliated facilities covered by the same master lease to the same default risk. Failure to comply with Medicare and Medicaid provider requirements is a default under several of our leases, master lease agreements and debt financing instruments. In addition, other potential defaults related to an individual facility may cause a default of an entire master lease portfolio and could trigger cross-default provisions in our outstanding debt arrangements and other leases. With an indivisible lease, it is difficult to restructure the composition of the portfolio or economic terms of the lease without the consent of the landlord.
OnMay 31, 2018 , we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from theU.S. Department of Justice stating that it was investigating to determine whether there had been a violation of the False Claims Act and/or the Anti-Kickback Statute with respect to the relationships between certain of our skilled nursing facilities and persons who serve or have served as medical directors, advisory board participants or other referral sources. As a general matter, our operating entities have established and maintain policies and procedures to promote compliance with the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and other applicable regulatory requirements. We have fully cooperated with theU.S. Department of Justice and promptly responded to its requests for information; inApril 2020 , we were advised that theU.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene in any subsequent action based on or related to the subject matter of this investigation. 66
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Inflation
We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from the Medicare program. We also derive revenue from state Medicaid and similar reimbursement programs. Payments under these programs generally provide for reimbursement levels that are adjusted for inflation annually based upon the state's fiscal year for the Medicaid programs and in each October for the Medicare program. These adjustments may not continue in the future, and even if received, such adjustments may not reflect the actual increase in our costs for providing healthcare services. Labor, supply expenses and capital expenditures make up a substantial portion of our cost of services. Those expenses can be subject to increase in periods of rising inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. To date, we have generally been able to implement cost control measures or obtain increases in reimbursement sufficient to offset increases in these expenses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to anticipate fully or otherwise respond to any future inflationary pressures.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except for rules and interpretive releases of theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB ASC is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to us. For any new pronouncements announced, we consider whether the new pronouncements could alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and determines whether any new or modified principles will have a material impact on our reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.


Goosehead Insurance, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2023 Results
The Ensign Group Reports First Quarter 2023 Results; Increases 2023 Annual Guidance
Advisor News
- Help women break through their retirement roadblocks
- Advisors await SEC decision on Vanguard fair fund distribution
- What to do when adult children become the client
- Judge rules insurers not liable for Newport Group’s AME Church pension lawsuit
- Why vacation homes are becoming a major blind spot for advisors
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Global Life/Annuity Reinsurers Remained Poised for Steady Growth
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
- Legacy Marketing Group® and Malibu Life USA Announce Distribution Partnership for New Fixed Indexed Annuity Platform
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Crum & Forster Insurance Group’s Members and Monitor Life Insurance Company of New York
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Life Insurance Company Centras Life JSC
- AM Best Withdraws Credit Ratings of New Providence Life Insurance Company
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
- St. Paul & Minnesota Foundation invests $15M to help revive downtown St. Paul
More Life Insurance News