Employers are considering ICHRAs, but barriers to adoption remain
WASHINGTON, D.C. — New research published today by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and Morgan Health, a division of JPMorganChase, identifies opportunities and barriers to broader adoption of individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements. The 2026 EBRI-Morgan Health Employer ICHRA Survey finds that just over one-third of employers are evaluating ICHRAs as a potential approach to providing health benefits, but broader adoption requires stronger education and market stability.
The survey comes at a time when employers continue to face pressure over health care costs, workforce flexibility and remote and nontraditional work arrangements. An ICHRA is a health benefit arrangement that allows employers to provide tax-free reimbursements to employees for qualified medical expenses, including individual health insurance premiums, rather than offering those employees coverage through a traditional group health plan. ICHRAs have attracted attention because they have the potential to provide employers with more predictable costs while giving workers greater choice. However, the survey finds that employer interest should not be interpreted as a guarantee of rapid adoption.
“ICHRAs have the potential to represent a significant shift in how some employers approach health benefits, but the survey shows that interest and adoption are not the same thing,” said Paul Fronstin, Ph.D., director of Health Benefits Research at EBRI. “Employers see possible advantages in flexibility, affordability and employee choice. At the same time, many remain concerned about whether the individual market can provide the affordability, provider networks, plan quality and administrative support needed to make ICHRAs a practical alternative to traditional group health plans.”
Key findings in the report include:
• Employer awareness of ICHRAs varies. Nearly six in 10 employers reported being at least somewhat familiar with ICHRAs, with familiarity highest among large employers that currently offer health benefits. Awareness remains lower among small employers that do not currently offer health coverage.
• More than one-third of employers reported that they are actively planning or evaluating an ICHRA. However, only 11% said they are actively planning implementation, suggesting that many employers are still gathering information rather than preparing to make an immediate change.
• Employers currently offering health benefits show notable interest in possible future adoption. One in three businesses currently offering health benefits reported likely ICHRA adoption in the next two years. Interest was strongest among employers with 100 or more employees, with 62% reporting they were somewhat or very likely to offer an ICHRA in the next two years after reviewing a description of the arrangement.
• Small employers that do not currently offer health coverage may represent an important segment for future ICHRA adoption, but awareness is a major challenge. Among small businesses not currently offering health coverage, one in four indicated a preference for an ICHRA over a traditional group plan. However, 55% of these employers were unaware that ICHRAs are available to them today.
• Across employer sizes, the most frequently cited reasons to consider ICHRAs were flexibility in benefit design (51%-61%), increased employee choice (38%-65%), and affordability for employers (47%-54%). Among employers that do not currently offer health benefits, ICHRAs were viewed as a possible pathway to providing coverage that may otherwise be difficult to afford or administer.
• In addition to lack of understanding of ICHRAs, concerns about the individual health insurance market remain the largest barriers to adoption. Employers expressed widespread concern about whether individual market premiums and out-of-pocket costs would be affordable for employees. Employers also cited concerns about provider networks, plan quality and employees’ ability to shop for and choose coverage that meets their needs.
• Operational and administrative challenges also remain important considerations. Employers reported concerns about compliance requirements, implementation complexity, the staff resources needed to manage an ICHRA, and uncertainty about the long-term stability of ICHRA policy.
• Employers identify clear factors that could increase adoption. Employers said they would be more likely to adopt ICHRAs if they could obtain the same quality of provider networks and choice as group plans. Broker and benefits consultant recommendations are influential, with 77% of employers saying a broker or benefits consultant recommendation would make them more likely to adopt an ICHRA and 76% saying a peer business offering an ICHRA would make them more likely to consider one.
• Policy and market changes could play a significant role in future adoption. Employers indicated that tax credits, a more stable and affordable individual marketplace, simplified compliance requirements, stronger employee education, payroll integration, claims and reimbursement support, and access to high-quality health plans could increase interest in offering an ICHRA.
• Among targeted strategies, employers expressed the greatest interest in using ICHRAs for all employees (78%). Among targeted groups, employers preferred using ICHRAs for remote employees (66%) and new hires (66%) over part-time workers (47%) and seasonal workers (42%).
“Small businesses want to offer insurance to their workers, but rising costs are making that increasingly difficult,” said Dan Mendelson, CEO of Morgan Health. “ICHRAs can control costs, offer employees greater choice and are particularly attractive for businesses offering insurance for the first time. Our survey shows that business owners would benefit from learning about ICHRAs and that insurers offering ICHRAs need to be focused on the quality of their networks and consumer experience.”
The online survey was conducted from March 19 to May 5, 2026, among 984 benefits decision-makers at employers with three or more employees. Respondents had been employed by their company for at least six months. The sample included large employers with 100 or more employees that currently offer health coverage, small employers with fewer than 100 employees that currently offer health coverage, and small employers with fewer than 100 employees that do not currently offer health coverage.


Corebridge Financial enhances The Power Series of Index Annuities
CANNEX names Gary Baker as its new CEO
Advisor News
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
- Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
- Investors aren’t waiting out uncertainty
- Transamerica and Advo(k)ate Advisors launch pooled employer plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
- NAIC regulators begin consensus phase on annuity illustration overhaul
More Annuity NewsLife Insurance News
- Indiana eyes more oversight of insurance companies' exposure to private credit
- HEALEY-DRISCOLL ADMINISTRATION RETURNS $14.5 MILLION TO HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES
- ‘Uniquely positioned’: Equitable outlines future post-Corebridge merger
- Don't keep checks with clerical errors
- The insurance distributor that builds its own software will win the next decade
More Life Insurance NewsProperty and Casualty News
- Why Indiana homeowners insurance may pay less for roof fixes
- Spokane fires could be latest disaster to unsettle property insurance market
- South Carolina budget committee rejects proposal to relax bar insurance mandate
- Insurance rate hikes to be reviewed
- Pritzker signs bills allowing state to review insurance rate increases
More Property and Casualty News