EDITORIAL: The main effect of LePage’s, Trump’s Medicaid work rules? Fewer people with coverage.
The federal government has wide latitude to grant states such waivers. Federal law to allow "experimental, pilot, or demonstration" projects that are "likely to assist in promoting the objectives" of Medicaid. Typically, states to expand coverage to new populations or test out ways of delivering benefits to improve enrollees' health and save money.
Imposing work requirements does none of that. The clearest result would simply be more people lacking health coverage, and the LePage administration's application to the federal
requiring that low-income, non-disabled adults work or participate in training 20 hours a week, volunteer 24 hours a month, or enroll at least half-time as a student in order to receive health coverage through Medicaid. If they don't comply, they could qualify for coverage for only three months in every three-year period.
The LePage administration is also proposing to charge a group of people earning poverty-level incomes monthly premiums, and to charge them when they use the emergency room for what DHHS determines to be non-emergencies. If Medicaid enrollees don't pay their monthly premiums, they would lose their coverage after a 60-day grace period. They wouldn't regain it until they've paid all of their missed premiums.
on requiring Medicaid beneficiaries to pay monthly premiums shows that premiums discourage people from enrolling in Medicaid, causing them to go without health coverage.
And while the LePage administration tries to argue in its waiver application that imposing work requirements improves people's economic circumstances, have shown . Between 2014 and 2015, nearly 6,900 adults lost food stamps after work requirements took effect in that benefit program. While the administration tried to argue the policy prompted more of them to work and caused their wages to grow, employment records show only 34 percent were working a year after losing food stamps, up from 28 percent a year before. On average, their income worked out to less than the federal poverty level for a two-person household.
inviting states to impose Medicaid work requirements, the Trump administration argued the policy change advances Medicaid's objective of providing medical assistance to those who can't afford it because employment improves health.
"CMS recognizes that a broad range of social, economic, and behavioral factors can have a major impact on an individual's health and wellness, and a growing body of evidence suggests that targeting certain health determinants, including productive work and community engagement, may improve health outcomes," read the letter from
The assumption behind the work requirement policy seems to be that people are purposefully not working so they can receive Medicaid. But a
And 80 percent of adult Medicaid recipients, according to Kaiser, live in families with someone who works. Among those Medicaid recipients who aren't working, most reported that a major illness, disability or family caregiving responsibility prevented them from working. Others were looking for work. More than 60 percent of the non-working Medicaid recipients were women, according to Kaiser; 17 percent were parents with children under age 6.
In sum, the Trump administration is targeting a poor population that's not exactly slacking off, and it's trying to drive more of them to work using a strategy that hasn't exactly proven effective.
Ultimately, the most obvious effect from imposing work requirements in Medicaid will be to deprive more people of the health coverage they need to live healthy, productive lives.
Follow for the latest opinions on the issues of the day in
___
(c)2018 the Bangor Daily News (Bangor, Maine)
Visit the Bangor Daily News (Bangor, Maine) at www.bangordailynews.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



‘Not knowing is rough.’ State Farm workers reel amid uncertainty
Pensions will be ‘on the chopping block’ in next recession, Jerry Brown says
Advisor News
- The McEwen Group Merges with Prairie Wealth Advisors to Form Billion Dollar RIA
- Guaranteed income streams help preserve assets later in retirement
- Economic pressures make boomerang living the new normal
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Guaranteed income streams help preserve assets later in retirement
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- You are paying for the health care of low-wage Walmart employees. Here is why | Opinion
- Samsung Bioepis Launches Ustekinumab Biosimilar, Marking Its First Product Launch in Japan
- Brown University School of Public Health Reports Findings in Managed Care (Exposure to the new Medicare Advantage risk adjustment model varies across insurers): Managed Care
- State lowers cap on some patient health care cost increases
- Increases in Idaho’s death rate expected
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Upgrades Issuer Credit Rating of Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
- Industry Innovator Scores New High-Water Mark: Reliance Matrix Logs 8 Millionth Employee Benefit/Absence Claim
- $150M+ asset sale payout distributed to Greg Lindberg policyholders
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Revises Outlook on France’s Non-Life Insurance Segment to Stable from Negative, Reflecting Top-line Growth, Technical Profitability
- Pacific Life Launches New Flagship Variable Universal Life Insurance Product
More Life Insurance News