EDITORIAL: State Rep. Jenkin’s new motorcycle-insurance mandate is positive change
What? Starting this week? How was this not the law before?
Rep.
He then took swift action after learning motorcyclists were exempt from the insurance mandate.
Legislation he sponsored this year to eliminate that clear flaw in the law was approved by both houses of the Legislature.
Regulations, particularly those that protect health and property, can sometimes make sense.
It was astonishing -- as well as irresponsible -- that motorcycles were not included with the liability mandate along with cars and trucks. Motorcycles are involved in accidents just like every other vehicle with an engine and the damage caused, as well as injuries, is just as severe.
Jenkin did the right, as well as wise, thing in seeking a quick resolution to this obvious problem.
"People are surprised to learn that motorcycle operators are not required to have liability insurance," Jenkin said at the time he sponsored the legislation. "My bill (HB 1014) simply requires those operating a motorcycle to meet the insurance requirements, or equivalent for registered motor vehicles under current law. When someone gets property damage, or in an accident, with an uninsured motorcyclist, they are stuck filing a claim and potentially paying a higher premium. Having motorcycles insured, just like other vehicles, makes sense."
In addition, lawmakers made other appropriate change involving motorcycles.
This law doesn't kick in until
Editorials are the opinion of the Union-Bulletin's Editorial Board. The board is composed of
___
(c)2019 Walla Walla Union-Bulletin (Walla Walla, Wash.)
Visit Walla Walla Union-Bulletin (Walla Walla, Wash.) at union-bulletin.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hartford police: Three arrested after armed home invasion, chase and crash
US Had Healthy Job Growth In July, Survey Finds
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News