Apr. 28--Grammar mavens can debate whether this constitutes irony or it's just a coincidence, but in the midst of a pandemic that already claimed 55,000 lives in the United States, the Supreme Court is yet again ruling on challenges to Obamacare. In a decision issued Monday, the court slapped down an attempt by congressional Republicans to shortchange insurance companies that offered policies through state health exchanges.
Fearing that insurers wouldn't participate because they didn't have historical data for rate-setting, the law's Democratic authors limited potential losses for insurers during the first three years of the program. If premiums didn't cover costs, insurers would be reimbursed. After partisan control shifted, Congress passed appropriations riders intended to block the promised payments.
There was nothing uncertain about the Supreme Court's assessment. Writing for an 8-1 majority, Justice Sonia Sotomayor succinctly cited "a principle as old as the nation itself: The government should honor its obligations." Indeed.
21 LPL Financial Advisors Named Forbes Top Women Advisors 2020
Advisor News
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News