Dr. Deb Richter: Legislators Deserve Publicly-funded Health Care Coverage And So Do All Vermonters
The bill's goal is to make serving in the legislature more attractive to Vermonters with young children, those with low incomes, and/or those without a source of health coverage. That makes sense. We would all benefit from having the most diverse legislature possible. And it's true that legislators work hard and put in long hours during the 4 months they serve in the legislature and that they work in an unpaid capacity for the rest of the year. Their salaries are relatively low, they receive no help with childcare, and they must count on getting health coverage through other sources, if that is available to them.
So, I have no objection to providing legislators with publicly funded comprehensive health care coverage for themselves and their families. But I can't for the life of me understand why those benefits shouldn't extend to all Vermonters.
I say so having watched the
They outlined many of the reasons why legislators decided to serve only because they were able to secure health care in some other way, like a spouse who has good health insurance through their job, or from the employer for whom they worked when the legislature was not in session. Again, these are problems many Vermonters deal with on a continuing basis. In fact, 44% of all Vermonters with health insurance under the age of 65 are under-insured—a major illness would lead to financial bankruptcy. Many people in this position avoid care, leading to worsening health and even premature death.
The final irony of S39 is that it is being swiftly moved along in the legislative process, unlike legislation that would apply to all Vermonters. Another bill -H.156, that would implement publicly funded health care for all Vermonters starting with primary care, is being completely ignored by health care leadership.
And this bill has 59 legislative sponsors. Backers of this bill were told "we don't have time to take it up" among a whole host of other excuses.
Yet it appears they have time to work on legislation to extend publicly funded health care to themselves. And if S39 passes the legislators would all be eligible for cost-free health care by
Too bad the same cannot be said for the rest of Vermonters.



Federal agency recognizes city of Shelby
DAVID BOTTOMS: Disability Insurance: The Importance of Preparing for the Unexpected
Advisor News
- The $25T market opportunity in mid-market and mass-affluent households
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- More than 500 apartments coming to former Centene campus in University City
- Many Virginians drop ACA coverage and more likely will, SCC hears
- Tens of thousands of Virginians dropping Obamacare coverage
- Select Board starts process to shift to new health insurance provider
- Advocates call for hearing about Geisinger-Risant insurance condition change request
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Stephanie Lundquist, Bryan Jordan join Securian Financial Board of Directors
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
More Life Insurance News