Despite Scrutiny Of 2016, Few Pollsters Changing Methods For 2020 Race - InsuranceNewsNet

Get access to exclusive stories you won’t find anywhere else. Get Access

InsuranceNewsNet

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Washington Wire
Topics
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Sponsored Content
  • INN Exclusives
  • Newswires
  • INNsider
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • ★ Regulation News
  • Magazine
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Susbcribe

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
Insider
Washington Wire
Washington Wire RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints Share
July 8, 2019 Washington Wire No comments Views: 42

Despite Scrutiny Of 2016, Few Pollsters Changing Methods For 2020 Race

Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, WI)

Jul. 8--With 16 months remaining until the 2020 presidential election and surveys weighing the favorites in a large and field of candidates released each week, some remain wary of the poll results in the aftermath of the 2016 cycle.

Despite the public scrutiny of surveys and pollsters following President Donald Trump's victory and the recommendations for altering approaches to polling that emerged in the election's wake, national reports show that most haven't changed their operations or aren't planning to this time around.

And in one major area -- weighting responses by education -- two pollsters in a pair of key Midwestern states aren't straying from their competing 2016 practices either.

Overall, national polls were found to be generally correct during the 2016 presidential race, while state-level surveys showed a competitive contest. Trump's support was under-estimated in the Upper Midwest, according to an election postmortem from the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

One contributing factor, the May 2017 report found, was that many state-level pollsters failed to correct for education levels among respondents. That approach would have better represented voters without a college degree, who tended to break for Trump.

But in Wisconsin's very own Marquette University Law School poll, director Charles Franklin has always weighted his data by education and continues to do so. And yet his surveys in the run-up to the election found Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton leading Trump among likely voters.

That includes the final poll before Election Day, which showed Clinton was up by 6 percentage points. Trump ultimately won Wisconsin by more than 22,000 votes.

"It's not a magic fix," Franklin said in a recent interview.

Polls already tend to overrepresent those with higher education levels, as they're the individuals who are more likely to take surveys, University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Barry Burden said.

Prior to 2016, he added, that wasn't much of a problem. But the division that placed college graduates in Clinton's camp and those with lower education levels in Trump's was "the surprise piece" that largely caught pollsters and the public off-guard.

Just as Franklin is continuing to weight by education in his surveys, in Michigan, one pollster said his firm is planning to embrace its longstanding practice of not doing so.

Bernie Porn, a pollster at EPIC-MRA in Lansing, which has a host of media clients including the Detroit Free Press, said while the firm has weighted for age or partisanship in the past, it doesn't do so for education.

"I'm aware of the fact that some pollsters think that you need to," he said. "We have not found that to be necessary."

Porn pointed to EPIC-MRA's fall 2016 polling, which he called "pretty accurate" and showed days before the election that Clinton had a 4 percentage-point lead over Trump, tighter than the 7-point lead she had at the end of October.

If there had been another of his firm's polls in the field the weekend before Election Day, Porn said he was sure it would have shown the race even. Trump ended up winning the state by 11,000 votes.

Asked if he thought weighting by education would have changed the surveys' results, he responded: "No, not at all."

While neither poll is changing its approach to the education aspect, Franklin is tweaking one element of his surveying in order to get at another observation in the AAPOR report, which noted that some Trump supporters who participated in polls prior to the election didn't reveal their allegiances.

The report noted that could be because the voters decided late to vote for Trump, or they misreported their stances in the polls, the so-called "Shy Trump" effect.

Franklin said he's looking to get at that by pushing respondents to select a candidate in a given race. For example, after initially asking respondents who they'd cast their ballots for, a pollster would follow that up with the question: "If you had to decide today, how would you vote?"

"That (question) is explicitly there to try to capture those undecideds who may not really be ready to say who they're voting for," he said.

Some 13 percent of voters in Wisconsin, Florida and Pennsylvania decided who they'd vote for in the final week of the campaign, and those voters broke by almost 30 points for Trump in Wisconsin, per the report.

Porn said his firm's pollsters also push undecided voters to express their opinion by asking respondents who they'd vote for if the election were today and they had to decide now. He added pollsters also seek to determine the intensity of respondents' views, whether they'd definitely vote for a candidate versus probably, for example.

Pew Research Center senior research methodologist Andrew Mercer cautioned the approach of pushing voters to select a candidate isn't infallible, as surveys aim to give a snapshot of respondents' answers at a given point in time and who's undecided in an election could change moment to moment.

"Even if you push them and even if you do get them to tell you who they're leaning toward, there's no guarantee that'll still be true in a week, two weeks," he said, adding: "People can always change their mind about who they're going to support."

Going forward, pollsters and survey experts said consumers should keep in mind the limits of survey results and generally look for averages of many polls, rather than drawing conclusions based on one.

Mark Blumenthal, a freelance survey research consultant, noted that looking at multiple surveys "means you're relying on the wisdom of many" pollsters, a practice he said is generally a safer bet than just a single one.

Still, he cautioned it's possible many polls can "all be wrong together" and demonstrate systematic errors.

Mercer, of the Pew Research Center, said it's important for members of the public to have proper expectations when reviewing results. For example, he said, surveys can tell readers they're looking at a close election but "can't necessarily go much further than that" to actually go on and predict the winner.

"If you're realistic about what you're trying to take away from polls, I think you can have a lot of faith in them," he said.

___

(c)2019 The Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, Wis.)

Visit The Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, Wis.) at www.wisconsinstatejournal.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Older

Government calls for evidence on floods and coastal erosion

Newer

Citigroup Says Fed Rate Cut In July Still ‘Not A Done Deal’

Advisor News

  • Smaller Stocks Gain On Bigger Players As 2019 Closes
  • PA Dumps Dozens Of Hedge Funds In Cost-Cutting Move
  • Fed Leaves Low Rates Alone And Foresees No Moves In 2020
  • Buttigieg Retirement Plan ‘Impressive,’ But How Will He Pay For It?
  • Americans Say They’ll Be Better Off Financially In 2020: Fidelity Survey
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Annuity Sales Down 8.4% In 3Q; Up 7.5% Year-To-Date: Report
  • Wink Unveils Beefed Up AnnuitySpecs Tool
  • Plaintiffs Abandon Lawsuit Targeting Security Benefit Proprietary Index
  • NAIC Regulators Move Annuity Sales Model Forward
  • Robert Kerzner Joins PHP Agency’s Board Of Directors
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits

  • HealthyWomen/WebMD Study: Women Don’t Discuss Health Concerns
  • Uninsured Rate For Texas’ Youngest Children Jumps, Report Says
  • Allianz Finds Americans Ready To Prioritize Health Over Finances In 2020
  • Insurers Argue Case For ACA Reimbursement To Supreme Court
  • StayWell Shares Top 5 Employer Wellness Trends For 2020
More Health/Employee Benefits

Life Insurance

  • New York Life Is Going To The Super Bowl
  • Ladder To Launch In New York Via Relationship With Allianz Life
  • Sproutt Launches; Uses Data To Reward Healthy Life Insurance Customers
  • Caregiver Took Out Life Insurance On Florida Man, Then Killed Him, Police Allege
  • Nationwide Named Official Insurance Partner Of Minor League Baseball
More Life Insurance

Featured Offers

Text Ads

Press ReleasesAll press releases

  • Symetra Awarded ISO 27001 Certification for Cybersecurity
  • Equisoft Partners with Refinitiv to Deliver a Powerful Solution for Wealth Managers
  • Life Health Insurance, Investment and Retirement Planning Powerhouse AmeriLife® Expands its Platform of Advanced Life Insurance Services with Acquisition of Agent Support Group
  • Brookstone Capital Management Expands Darryl Ronconi’s Role, Naming Him President and Chief Operating Officer
  • WoodmenLife Launches Unified Selling Experience for Agents with iPipeline
Add your Press Release >

Topics

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation

Top Sections

  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Insider

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter Google+
© 2019 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your INNsider Account

Not registered? Become an INNsider.