Defeat of no fault auto insurance overhaul doesn’t end the debate over high rates
Lawmakers and
"We'll come back next year and the year after that and try again until we get rate cuts for everybody," Duggan said following the 45-63 vote on the auto insurance proposal Thursday night. "We've got more ideas and we'll be back because I'm not going to quit until we get something through."
He enlisted
"The business community in
Sen.
There are three areas that could help, he said, including: limits on what caregivers are paid; creating an authority to root out fraud by both insurance companies and customers, and capping benefits for uninsured drivers, passengers or pedestrians.
More:
More: No-fault fixes? How other states reined in auto insurance costs
"I like the ideas that we have put forward that do have the potential for savings without impacting people's medical coverage if they're in a catastrophic accident," he said. "That's a good place to start."
"We have a plan that brings down costs and doesn't force people into bankruptcy," said House Minority Leader
But the issue of prohibiting companies from using non-driving factors in setting rates is a nonstarter for many lawmakers because bringing down rates in urban areas like
"It's not a cost savings, it's a cost shift," Speaker of the House
And Duggan said even though he'd like to see the same rates for drivers across the state, he knows that's not a solution because it would cause rates to go up for drivers across the state.
"Everybody knows as soon as you propose it, that it won't pass," he said. "We wanted to do something that was politically possible."
Leonard says he's ready to move on to other issues.
"This is an issue we've been working diligently on for the last month and it's sucked a lot of oxygen out of the room," he said. "The issue is not dead, but I do need to start working on other issues."
The plan that failed would have guaranteed a 40% reduction in insurance rates for people who choose a lower level of coverage --
Supporters of the legislation were trying to address
Opponents said the bill didn't guarantee rate reduction because it allowed insurance companies to get an exemption from the state if they could prove they couldn't make money under the reduced rates. And that the reductions would only be in effect for five years.
Contact
How the
___
(c)2017 the Detroit Free Press
Visit the Detroit Free Press at www.freep.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Steve Scalise strikes deal with key congressman on National Flood Insurance Program’s future
Advisor News
- When a client moves, their insurance plan needs to move, too
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
- Giving while you’re living: 3 frequently asked questions about gifting
- Helping clients prepare for one of their biggest retirement expenses
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News