Concerns raise over city's insurance coverage on Brett's
The building is leased to
At the
The city's attorney,
Poole did say, however, that there is potential for the city to be liable.
"You've got knowledge of unsafe condition of a property that's owned by the city," Poole said. "If a catastrophic event were to happen, there is a potential for liability. The defendants in that would be the city, the operator and the tenant. It would be problematic if there was no insurance coverage."
Mayor
However, Ross was not ready to let the issue to wait two weeks. He said the city is "going bare" of liability insurance, and "if you think that's a good idea for your business, that's fine; I don't think we should wait two weeks for the city attorney to come back."
"Do we know we're bare?" Bean asked. "That's the question I want to ask, that's why I want to wait for
Ross said Poole could do the research into matter instead of waiting for Bach's return, and Bean pointed out that Poole is paid by the hour, and said he does not want to pay him to clarify something "that we're pretty sure we do know the answer, and lawyers aren't cheap." Poole said the matter would take time to research, and that the appropriate time to come to the commission about the matter would be at the next city commission meeting, when Bach would be back.
"We (the city) have a lot of common areas, sidewalks, a lot of common areas where we have injuries on those properties," Woleshin said. "We don't have to designate all the common areas of the city for there to be liability coverage to respond to one of those claims."
He said the city has no property coverage on Brett's since that coverage is transferred in the lease to the lessee, but his opinion is that the city does have liability coverage for the building.
Ross asked if the insurance company is aware that the building has been declared unsafe, and Woleshin said, "Not that I know of." Woleshin said an insurance company could deny coverage if there was "misrepresentation in application," but disclosure of the unsafe building notice was not required in the application for insurance.
"Would it be prudent to tell (the insurance company about the notice)?" Ross asked.
"I would leave that to every individual client," Woleshin replied. "If that's the directive of the commission of city staff to impose that question, we certainly would. It's prudent if we have solutions, if there are potential solutions to mitigate the risk. We represent our clients and try to get the best outcome for our clients, and so I wouldn't want to bring something to the carrier's attention without a game plan to manage it."
"I think this has been all cleared up," Bean said. "Asking and questioning if there is insurance doesn't make the insurance disappear. I think the insurance has been here, and it seems like it has. I think we are covered, based on our experts we can talk to."
A county business operator asked the city commission to look into policies of the
"
"What's your transparency showing why you are charging
In other business, the city commission: · Proclaimed
VOICE OF THE PEOPLE
Man sentenced to 9 years in prison for ‘grandparent’ scam, unemployment fraud
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News