Clinic says malpractice award was engineered to push for tort reform
An insurance company engineered a record-setting medical malpractice judgment against an
In
The boy's parents, Kathleen and
Court filings by parties on both sides of the case suggest that the clinic, the doctors and the family were interested in settling the case out of court for an amount that would be covered by the clinic's insurance policy. The insurance company resisted, however, and rejected proposals to settle the case for any amount, which resulted in the malpractice case going to trial.
This week, the clinic's new attorney,
MMIC officials did not return a message seeking comment for this article.
Once the jury in the Kromphardt case returned a verdict against the clinic for
House File 161 capped noneconomic damages in lawsuits against health care providers for medical incidents that result in the loss or impairment of a bodily function, disfigurement or death, at
In the new court filings, Rowley argues MMIC "unreasonably chose not to settle and make the lawsuit and verdict go away, and then used the clinic's financial and reputational demise as propaganda to get tort reform passed in
While executing this "deceitful and fraudulent plan," MMIC was also "holding seminars and lobbying for the implementation of noneconomic caps in
The bankruptcy element of the plan was almost successful, Rowley claims, until a federal judge in the bankruptcy case stepped in and dismissed the case as fraudulent.
Rowley claims that MMIC, in executing the alleged scheme, repeatedly put its own financial and political interests ahead of its policyholder, the clinic, which it used as "a pawn to change
Insurer pursues appeal while clinic pursues settlement
The new court filing is part of the clinic's response to a federal lawsuit MMIC recently filed in an effort to block Rowley and the clinic from undermining MMIC's appeal of the
MMIC is seeking a federal-court injunction that will preserve the
Rowley's new filing on behalf of the clinic is in direct response to that request for an injunction. Rowley is asking the federal court to refrain from issuing the injunction and is asking the court to allow the clinic and its physicians to negotiate a settlement with the Kromphardts.
Separately, the clinic and its physicians want to sue MMIC for bad faith and "expose what happened," Rowley told the court. Instead, the insurer is tying their hands by pursuing an appeal that could lead to a new trial, while the clinic and its doctors want to negotiate a settlement now, Rowley told the court.
Rowley is a high-profile plaintiffs' attorney and
"We're working on the complaint right now," he said, adding that he expects the lawsuit to expose details of the lobbying efforts that led to the
Judge tossed out bankruptcy case in March
This latest round of litigation follows an aborted bankruptcy filing by the clinic last fall. The Kromphardts' attorneys had challenged the filing, arguing it was filed in bad faith to avoid payment of the malpractice award.
On
In a
She noted that MMIC paid fees to the clinic's bankruptcy professionals and offered the clinic favorable terms on its insurance coverage when no one else would. In addition, the judge stated, MMIC had offered to extend credit to the clinic.
"A question arises about whether the bankruptcy was motivated by a proper purpose or to obtain financial advantages from MMIC in exchange for filing bankruptcy to attempt to protect it from making payment under the policy," Shodeen stated in her decision.
PCC Notes: NJCAA recognizes PCC athletes for academic excellence
Your Home column: Why you need a home inventory and how to make one
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News