CBO: $15 Wage Would Cost 1.4M Jobs, Lift 900,000 Out Of Poverty
Raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour would lift nearly 1 million people out of poverty but would leave even more people without any job at all, the Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis Monday that deals another blow to President Biden’s demand for a wage hike in the next coronavirus relief bill.
A higher federal standard also would raise costs for Americans and for the federal government itself, as Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare pay more to lower-wage health workers, CBO said, though fewer people would be on welfare. The deficit would take a $54 billion hit over the next decade.
The analysis comes as congressional Democrats begin writing the details of Mr. Biden’s coronavirus relief package, with the $15 minimum wage perhaps the most controversial part of the new president’s wish list.
Sen. Bernard Sanders, the Vermont independent who serves as Democrats’ chairman on the Budget Committee and who is the chief proponent of the $15 wage, was dismayed by the report, saying he found the soaring deficit calculation “hard to understand.”
He also said there’s no way Congress can approve the $15 rate if it needs Republican support, so he said the policy will have to be tucked into a coronavirus package passed through the budget process, which can circumvent a filibuster, dispensing with the need for bipartisanship.
“The only way to increase the minimum wage to $15 an hour now is to pass it with 51 votes through budget reconciliation,” Mr. Sanders said.
It was Mr. Sanders’ proposal that the CBO analyzed.
He calls for raising the federal wage from its current $7.25 rate to $9.50 on June 1, moving to $11 on June 1, 2022, $12.50 a year later, $14 in 2024, and $15 in June 2025. After that, it would be raised automatically to keep pace with wage inflation.
CBO said job losses would accumulate over the years, and by 2025 1.4 million fewer people would be working, thanks to the increase. Half of those would be unemployed and looking for jobs, but half would have left the labor force altogether, the analysts said.
“Young, less educated people would account for a disproportionate share of those reductions in employment,” CBO said.
But the flip side is that 17 million people who would be making less than $15 an hour would see their income raised, as would another 10 million who would be making just above the minimum rate, CBO said. The better wages would lift 900,000 people out of poverty by 2025.
Left-leaning economists cheered that news, saying low-wage workers have earned better pay.
“In short, given which parts of the workforce have economically suffered the most from the pandemic, it seems more than appropriate to include a minimum wage increase in any relief and rescue package,” wrote Josh Bivens and other analysts at the Economic Policy Institute.
The institute also doubted the CBO job loss projections, calling them “just wrong and inappropriately inflated relative to what cutting-edge economics literature would indicate.”
Mr. Sanders, meanwhile, said the CBO’s deficit projection was out of whack, saying the office found a much smaller dent two years ago.
What is clear, though, is that raising the minimum wage would have a serious budget effect. Mr. Sanders said that boosts Democrats’ argument that it’s proper to tuck a wage increase into the coronavirus bill, which must fit within narrow budget rules to be considered under protections against a filibuster.
That process is known as “reconciliation.”
“What that means is that we can clearly raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour under the rules of reconciliation,” Mr. Sanders said.
While the federal minimum wage is $7.25, most states have a higher wage, up to $14 an hour in California.
In many cases, cities have gone even higher. The District of Columbia has a $15 wage rate, for example.
CBO’s analysis underscored the depths of the federal government’s reach into America’s economy.
Programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare dominate health spending in the U.S., and raising the minimum wage would increase costs to the programs because it would mean having to pay more for some health services.
Social Security spending would increase about $15 billion over a decade because inflation would increase, lifting the average benefit check, CBO said.
And the analysts said governments would have to pay about $31 billion more for unemployment benefits “because more workers would be unemployed.”
But there would be fewer people using government programs such as food stamps, which would cut about $10 billion in spending from those programs over a decade.
Fewer people would be claiming some tax credits for the working poor, saving billions there, too, the CBO said.



You say
Could Steinberg backlash hurt AG prospects? + Lyft fined for Prop. 22 texts + Vaccination equity
Advisor News
- SEC manual shake-up: What every insurance advisor needs to know now
- Retirement moves to make before April 15
- Millennials are inheriting billions and they want to know what to do with it
- What Trump Accounts reveal about time and long-term wealth
- Wellmark still worries over lowered projections of Iowa tax hike
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Variable annuity sales surge as market confidence remains high, Wink finds
- New Allianz Life Annuity Offers Added Flexibility in Income Benefits
- How to elevate annuity discussions during tax season
- Life Insurance and Annuity Providers Score High Marks from Financial Pros, but Lag on User Friendliness, JD Power Finds
- An Application for the Trademark “TACTICAL WEIGHTING” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Tulane University Researchers Describe New Findings in Oral Cancer (Nationwide oral cancer screening and rural-urban disparities in oral cancer diagnosis, treatment and mortality: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan): Oncology – Oral Cancer
- Findings from University of Florida Provides New Data about Insurance (Barriers To Insurance Innovation): Insurance
- Data on Managed Care Reported by Researchers at Harvard Medical School (Year 1 Impact of Offering Non-Emergency Medical Transportation on Care Utilization Among Low-Income and Disabled Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage): Managed Care
- Investigators from Harvard University Target Managed Care (Fluctuating State Medicaid Dental Coverage: Asymmetric Impact of Benefit Cuts and Expansions, 2010-21): Managed Care
- Research Conducted at Harvard University School of Dental Medicine Has Provided New Information about Health and Medicine (Dental Coverage Through Medicaid Managed Care vs Fee-for-Service): Health and Medicine
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Best’s Special Report: US Life/Health Insurance Industry Sees Impairments Halved in 2024
- Jackson Study Exposes Stark Disconnect Between Anticipation of Policy Change and Retirement Planning Conversations
- Thrivent plans to add 600 advisors this year
- Third Federal Named a top Financial Services Company by USA TODAY
- New Allianz Life Annuity Offers Added Flexibility in Income Benefits
More Life Insurance News