California union sends misleading texts on CalPERS election. Here are the facts [The Sacramento Bee]
Sep. 20—Many
The texts, presented as survey questions, included an inaccuracy related to a board vote and presented information on other votes cast by board members
Brown, a retired school administrator, faces new challenger
The texts, written to present Brown in a favorable light, followed a campaign mailer that Local 1000 sent to many of the union's members expressing support for Brown and Emon-Moran.
The 13-member CalPERS board oversees a state retirement fund recently valued at about
Local 1000's support for Brown and Emon-Moran puts the organization — representing about 100,000 state employees — at odds with other SEIU branches and most of organized labor in
Local 1000 is going its own way primarily at the direction of newly elected union president
Brown said the texts, sent about a week after the flyers, were intended to "inform people of the CalPERS election."
"We were stating the facts of the voting records of
"They didn't give us all the information we needed; they just gave us very biased information," she said.
The first text said Miller had voted to increase health insurance premiums by "as much as 23%," to increase long term care insurance premiums by 90% and to "spend
The text asked how likely the recipient would be to vote for him.
Then came a second text saying Brown voted against raising health premiums and said she "opposed spending
Office building
The description of the
CalPERS owns a long-vacant lot at the corner of Third and
Miller voted in favor of the proposal, and Brown against it. But the building was never intended for CalPERS "executives" or any CalPERS staff, according to public summaries of the proposal.
With apartments, office and retail space, the building would have been a real estate investment intended to support CalPERS operations and the pension fund.
In the
CalPERS cut ties with the project's developer,
Brown said the texts included information on the vote "as it was relayed to (him)."
"There were no tenants for the building, so did think it would be used for executives, since there were no tenants? Maybe yes. How it was relayed to us, the way we interpreted it, that's what it meant to us," he said.
Health insurance prices
The CalPERS board voted on 2022 health insurance rates in July. Employee plans will cost an average of 5.65% more next year, while the Medicare Advantage plans offered by CalPERS will see an average reduction of nearly four-tenths of a percentage point.
The CalPERS board voted 11-1, with one absence, to approve the rates, which the system's representatives had negotiated with insurance carriers. Brown was the "no" vote.
One plan, the PERS Select PPO, will go up in price by 23% next year. The plan has been the cheapest option among the 14 plans CalPERS offers to everyone who's eligible for its health insurance, and about 110,000 people are enrolled in it.
The board approved the 23% increase for that plan as part of a shift to a new way of pricing its health insurance products. Under the old pricing structure, policyholders were rushing from expensive plans with the best benefits to the cheapest plans with fewer benefits.
The richest plans, generally favored by older and less healthy people, were entering into "death spirals" and would have become unsustainable,
The "risk adjustment" program adopted by the board essentially shifts money from plans with lower health risk to those with higher risk. Under the plan, prices will increase again in 2023 and then begin to stabilize, Green has said.
Brown said she couldn't support the new pricing structure.
"The low-cost PPOs are now subsidizing the better, more expensive plans and I just could not do it," she said.
Miller said the change was necessary for the stability of the health insurance program.
"Our responsibility, as painful as it may be, is we have to make prudent decisions that are in the best interests of all of our members," Miller said of his vote. "And trying to mitigate the impact by spreading costs over time is one of the kinds of things we can do, but ultimately we have to make the decision that put us on fiscally responsible ground and provide for the benefits our members need and there really was no good alternative."
Long-term care insurance
The board voted 10-1 in November, with one abstention and one absence, to approve the long-term care price increases referenced in the texts. Brown was the "no" vote.
CalPERS vastly underpriced its long-term care insurance policies when it started offering them in the 1990s, and the system has been raising the prices ever since, including an 85% rate increase spread over 2015 and 2016 that prompted a lawsuit.
The board approved a rate hike of 90% over this year and next year after the pension system's insurance experts said the insurance products wouldn't remain sustainable over the long term without the new increases.
"It's been a disaster," Miller said of the insurance. "I feel very sorry for what's happened with that and the impact to a lot of our members. But just voting no and hiding our head in the sand and not addressing the financial and legal realities would not be serving our members."
Brown said she wanted CalPERS to revisit the assumptions used to estimate future costs for the insurance, particularly given increased mortality rates of the last year.
Union endorsements
Local 1000 President Brown's process in deciding to throw the union's support behind CalPERS board member Brown and Emon-Moran is a big break from past practice, said
Taylor said that in the past, Local 1000's
The board hasn't weighed in specifically on the CalPERS election, but voted in late 2019 to support candidates endorsed by
The council supports Miller and Pacheco, and has put the group's name on campaign mailers supporting the candidates.
Brown said the decision to support Brown and Emon-Moran had to be made "quickly," and asserted he is within his authority to authorize spending on the CalPERS election.
"Sometimes the direction from one president will be different from another president," he said.
___
(c)2021 The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.)
Visit The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) at www.sacbee.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Mother-Son Duo Frame Animals In Insurance Fraud Scam, NC Officials Say
Rise of the 'Chief Empathy Officer': global leaders prioritise wellbeing and ESG commitments
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News