American Council of Life Insurers: Women Are Financial Decision Makers And Oppose Federal Proposal To Take Away Supplemental Insurance Benefits
New research finds women with children are likely to be financial decision makers for their households and oppose a proposed federal regulation that would eliminate many supplemental insurance benefits as a financial planning option for their families.
Conducted
Supplemental benefit policies cover health expenses excluded from primary medical insurance -- coverage a worker receives on the job, for example. They help cover costs not normally covered by medical insurance such as safety modifications to an apartment or home, transportation to a medical facility, co-pays and deductibles, and many other things normally paid for "out-of-pocket". Earlier research found that these benefits are important for middle-income families: 80% of adults with annual incomes between
"Health events often deliver significant blows to family budgets," said ACLI President & CEO
The research found most mothers, 82 percent, believe supplemental insurance benefits are valuable; 77 percent of those who are currently employed say that having the option to purchase this coverage through their employer is appealing.
Supplemental benefit policies are commonly sold through employers, though they also can be obtained individually.
Supplemental benefit products are not a form of primary medical coverage and are therefore distinct from the limited medical insurance products, such as short-term limited duration insurance, discussed in the Tri-Agency proposal. Life insurers are committed to ensuring that consumers are informed on what supplemental benefits products cover and the financial protections they provide prior to purchase.
Among other things, the proposal would disallow many benefits now available to policyholders of certain supplemental products. It also questions whether certain benefits from cancer or other specified disease products should be disallowed. The proposal would also create new requirements for employers by making them report supplemental benefits paid to their employees as wages. For the policyholder, that would mean these benefits are taxable and could discourage people from obtaining the financial protection they need.
The combination of higher taxes and the elimination of many existing benefits could make these products much less protective for families.
Nearly half of the women with children surveyed reported having faced financial hardships as a result out-of-pocket medical expenses.
"An average 3-day hospital stay is
"Proposing structural changes to supplemental benefit policies and tax changes that would make them inaccessible to the very people who need to protect their family finances makes no sense at all," said Neely.
* * *
* * *
Original text here: https://www.acli.com/posting/nr24-030


State Briefs
American Property Casualty Insurance Association: Indiana Enacts Protections Against Third Party Litigation Funding
Advisor News
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
- Giving while you’re living: 3 frequently asked questions about gifting
- Helping clients prepare for one of their biggest retirement expenses
- Important year-end financial conversations every advisor must have
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News