Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models (Cardiac and Orthopedic Bundled Payment Models) Final Rule (CMS-5519-F) and Medicare ACO…
Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models (Cardiac and Orthopedic Bundled Payment Models) Final Rule (CMS-5519-F) and Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model
On
The announcement finalizes significant new policies that:
* Improve cardiac care: Three new payment models will support clinicians in providing care to patients who receive treatment for heart attacks, heart surgery to bypass blocked coronary arteries, or cardiac rehabilitation following a heart attack or heart surgery.
* Improve orthopedic care: One new payment model will support clinicians in providing care to patients who receive surgery after a hip fracture, other than hip replacement. In addition, CMS is finalizing updates to the
* Provides an
These new payment models and the updated
Improving Patient Outcomes through Cardiac and Orthopedic Care Coordination Models
These models are an opportunity to further provider collaboration and sharing of best practices. In the
* The Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Model;
* The Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Model;
* The Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) Model; and
* The Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) Incentive Payment Model.
Acute care hospitals in certain selected geographic areas will participate in retrospective episode-based payments for items and services that are related to AMI, CABG, and SHFFT treatment and recovery, beginning with a hospitalization and extending for 90 days following hospital discharge.
The first performance period for the new episode payment models (the AMI, CABG, and SHFFT Models) and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model will begin on
The final rule also makes adjustments to the
Model Design
Under the episode payment models (CABG, AMI, SHFFT) and CJR, the hospital is financially accountable for the quality and cost of an episode of care, which incentivizes increased coordination of care among hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care providers.
For each performance year of the models, CMS will establish
All providers and suppliers will continue to be paid under the usual payment system rules and procedures of the
For the AMI, CABG, and SHFFT Models, participants will earn a composite quality score (CQS) which is based on quality of care previously provided. Participants' CQS will be largely based on an organization's quality performance in comparison to that of other hospitals and will allow hospitals with relatively high quality performance an increased opportunity for financial incentives within the models. Following completion of a model performance year, participant hospitals that achieve actual episode spending below the target price and achieve an acceptable or better CQS will be eligible to earn a reconciliation payment from
All hospital participants that achieve actual spending below the quality-adjusted target price and achieve an acceptable or better CQS will be eligible to earn up to 5 percent of their target price in performance years 1, 2 and 3: 10 percent in performance year 4; and 20 percent in performance year 5 for the AMI, CABG, and SHFFT Models. Hospitals with model episode spending that exceeds the target price will be financially responsible for the difference to
Under the CR Incentive Payment Model, all providers and suppliers will continue to be paid under the usual
Participants
The AMI and CABG Models will be implemented in 98 geographic areas, defined by MSAs. MSAs are counties associated with a core urban area that has a population of at least 50,000. Non-MSA counties (no urban core area or urban core area of less than 50,000 population) were not eligible for selection. Eligible MSAs must have had at least 75 AMI Model eligible cases among other criteria. The SHFFT Model will be implemented in the 67 MSAs where the CJR Model is currently underway. To be eligible for the CJR Model, eligible MSAs had to have at least 400 eligible CJR cases. The MSAs were selected by stratified random sampling for CJR. The 98 MSAs selected for the AMI and CABG Models and the 67 MSAs for the CJR and SHFFT Models can be found on our website: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.
Participant hospitals in these selected geographic areas are all acute care hospitals paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) that are not concurrently participating in Models 2, 3, or 4 of the Innovation Center's Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative for AMI, CABG, or SHFFT episodes. Geographic areas where all-payer models under the Innovation Center are operating --
The CR Incentive Payment Model will be implemented in 45 geographic areas also selected for the AMI and CABG Models, defined by MSAs, as well as in 45 geographic areas that were not selected for the AMI and CABG Models. This test will cover the same five-year period as the episode payment models. The 90 MSAs selected can be found on our website. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm
Approximately 1,120 hospitals will participate in the AMI and CABG models, 860 hospitals in the SHFFT Model and 1,320 hospitals in the CR Incentive Payment Model. For more information on participants, please visit https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.
Additional Flexibilities for Participant Hospitals and Collaborating Providers and Suppliers
The episode payment models waive certain existing payment system requirements to assist participant hospitals in caring for beneficiaries in the most efficient, convenient setting; to encourage timely, accessible care; and to facilitate improved communication and treatment adherence. These include: a waiver of the requirement for a three-day inpatient hospital stay prior to admission for a covered skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay under certain conditions beginning in performance year 3 for the AMI Model; allowing payment for certain telehealth services provided to a beneficiary in his or her home; and allowing payment for certain types of physician-directed home visits for non-homebound beneficiaries. In addition, a participant hospital may wish to enter into certain financial arrangements with collaborating providers, suppliers, and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), who are engaged in care redesign with the hospital. Under these arrangements, a participant hospital may share payments received from
No waivers of any fraud and abuse authorities are being issued in the final rule. However, CMS and the
Quality and the Pay-for-Performance Methodology
These episode payment models have the potential to improve quality. All of the episode payment models adopt a quality first principle where hospitals must achieve a minimum level of quality before receiving reconciliation payments when episode spending is below the target price. Higher quality of care, considering both performance and improvement, may lead a hospital to garner greater financial reward if the CQS reflects high hospital performance and improvement on the relevant quality measures for that model. In response to comment, CMS added a voluntary quality measure for the CABG Model. The specific measures for each model and the pay for performance methodology can be found on our website at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.
To assist hospitals in pursuing quality, CMS provides additional tools including: 1) providing hospitals with relevant spending and utilization data; 2) waiving certain
Beneficiary Benefits and Protections
Under these models, beneficiaries retain their freedom to choose services and providers. Physicians and hospitals are expected to continue to meet current standards required by the
Interaction with Other Models and Programs
Hospitals participating in other CMS models or programs such as the Shared Savings Program and other ACO initiatives are included in the episode payment models if they are located in a selected MSA. Beneficiaries included in a model episode may also be assigned or aligned to an ACO, in which case CMS will attribute savings achieved during an episode to the episode model participant, and include model reconciliation payments for ACO-assigned beneficiaries as ACO expenditures. Episodes initiated by beneficiaries who are prospectively assigned to certain two-sided risk shared savings programs such as the Next Generation ACO Model, the Comprehensive ESRD Care Model, and in response to comment, a Shared Savings Program ACO in Track 3, will be excluded from the model.
Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model
The CR Incentive Payment Model tests whether a payment incentive can increase the utilization of cardiac rehabilitative services, which have historically been under-used by
CMS established a two-part cardiac rehabilitation incentive payment to be paid retrospectively based on the total cardiac rehabilitation use of beneficiaries attributable to participant hospitals, and limited by coverage requirements for CR and Intensive CR. The initial payment is
Improvements in
The final rule also makes several modest adjustments to the CJR Model that are largely conforming changes for consistency with the other episode payment models. These include refinements for use of the SNF waiver, exclusion of beneficiaries participating in selected ACOs, and revising target pricing methodology to include reconciliation and repayment amounts for performance years 3, 4, and 5. We are finalizing revisions to the quality adjustment to incorporate improvement as well as absolute performance. CMS also finalized changes to align CJR with the episode payment models around financial arrangements and beneficiary engagement incentives, compliance enforcement, appeals processes, and beneficiary notifications. For more information on the final rule, including effective dates for the adjustments made, please go to www.federalregister.gov
Revisions in Response to Comments on the Proposed Rule for the episode payment models
CMS made several revisions to the episode payment models in response to the robust and thoughtful comments received on the proposed rule. The following are examples of key revisions.
* Implements downside risk for the AMI, CABG, and SHFFT Models in performance year 3 (
* Revises the proposed transfer policy. For AMI episodes, the episode will be canceled at the original transferring hospital and a new one established upon admission to the hospital accepting the transfer if the discharging DRG for that hospital falls under applicable cardiac episode payment model MS-DRGs and the hospital accepting the transfer is a participant in the cardiac episode payment model.
* Adopts a voluntary quality measure for the CABG Model.
* Creates greater protections for low-volume hospitals.
* Expands flexibility to offer additional beneficiary engagement incentives beyond transportation for CR Incentive Payment Model.
* Establishes an Alternative Payment Models Beneficiary Ombudsman to monitor the models and field inquiries from beneficiaries, if needed.
New Accountable Care Organization Model Opportunity
Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model
CMS is announcing the new Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model. This new opportunity, beginning in 2018, will allow clinicians to join Advanced Alternative Payment Models to improve care and potentially earn an incentive payment under the Quality Payment Program, created by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). The new Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model will test a payment model that incorporates more limited downside risk than is currently present in Tracks 2 or 3 of the Medicare Shared Savings Program in order to encourage more rapid progression to performance-based risk.
The new Model is based on Shared Savings Program Track 1 with maximum 50% shared savings rate, but incorporates elements of Track 3 including: prospective beneficiary assignment to allow ACOs to know in advance the patient population for which they are responsible; choice of symmetrical thresholds from which to start sharing in savings or losses; and the option to elect the SNF 3-Day Rule Waiver to provide greater flexibility to Track 1+ ACOs to better coordinate and deliver high quality care. The model has a fixed 30% loss sharing rate and the maximum level of downside risk would vary based on the composition of ACOs with potentially lower levels of risk available to qualifying ACOs that include physicians or small rural hospitals.
Under a bifurcated approach, in 2018, the maximum loss limit would be either 8 percent of ACO participant
The Track 1+ Model 2018 application cycle will align with the annual application cycle for the Shared Savings Program. Additional information about the application process is forthcoming, but organizations interested in applying should plan to submit the required Notice of Intent to Apply in May of 2017. The Track 1+ Model will be open to Shared Savings Program Track 1 ACOs that are within their current agreement period, initial applicants to the Shared Savings Program, and Track 1 ACOs renewing their agreement that meet Model eligibility criteria. For Track 1 ACOs that have renewed their agreements, the benchmark that would apply under the Model could also incorporate a regional benchmark adjustment consistent with the timing and phase-in of the regional benchmark adjustment, as outlined in the
Additional information on the Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model will be forthcoming.
Innovation Center and Support for Participants
The episode payment models have been designed by the CMS Innovation Center, which was established by section 1115A of the Social Security Act (as added by section 3021 of the Affordable Care Act).
CMS plans to offer education and training to support and prepare clinicians in these models. These activities will include webinars about each model as well as how to qualify for the Quality Payment Program incentive payments, fact sheets explaining what model participants will need to do to be successful in the models, and open door forums where CMS staff will be able to answer questions about the models.
The Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models final rule can be viewed at https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current starting
For more information about the individual cardiac and orthopedic bundled payment models finalized through this rule, visit the CMS Innovation Center website at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.
30FurigayJane-5731278 30FurigayJane



5 Ways the New Congress Can Support Older Americans, Their Families
Advisor News
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
- Take advantage of the exploding $800B IRA rollover market
- Study finds more households move investable assets across firms
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Court fines Cutter Financial $100,000, requires client notice of guilty verdict
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: From Acquisitions to Partnerships—Asset Managers’ Growing Role With Life/Annuity Insurers
- $80k surrender charge at stake as Navy vet, Ameritas do battle in court
- Sammons Institutional Group® Launches Summit LadderedSM
- Protective Expands Life & Annuity Distribution with Alfa Insurance
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Trademark Application for “CVS FLEX BENEFITS” Filed: CVS Pharmacy Inc.
- Medicaid in Mississippi
- Policy Expert Offers Suggestions for Curbing US Health Care Costs
- Donahue & Horrow LLP Prevails in Federal ERISA Disability Case Published by the Court, Strengthening Protections for Long-Haul COVID Claimants
- Only 1/3 of US workers feel resilient
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News