A Graphic Look at a Medicaid Per Capita Cap
Our new explainer shows why converting Medicaid to a per capita cap -- a core part of the House and Senate Republican bills to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) -- would shift large costs and risks to states, threatening coverage and access to care for the more than 70 million low-income children, seniors, and people with disabilities who rely on Medicaid.
Both bills would end Medicaid's federal-state financing partnership in which the federal government pays a fixed percentage of state Medicaid costs -- on average, 64 percent today. (For beneficiaries enrolled under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, the federal share is 90 percent in 2020 and thereafter, whereas the average federal share for most groups and services is 57 percent.) Instead, beginning in 2020, federal funding would be capped at a set amount per beneficiary. This per capita cap would equal a state's past federal Medicaid spending per beneficiary, rising each year by a slower rate than expected growth in per beneficiary spending. That would cut federal funding, relative to current law, by growing amounts each year.
States facing federal funding shortfalls due to the cap would have to raise taxes, cut other parts of their budgets like education, or -- as is far likelier -- cut Medicaid eligibility, benefits, or provider payments, jeopardizing coverage and access to needed care.
A per capita cap would also shift financial risk to states for unanticipated costs, such as faster-than-expected cost growth across the health care system or unexpected increases in Medicaid per-beneficiary costs due to a public health emergency or a new breakthrough drug. And a per capita cap wouldn't account for the certain increase in seniors' per beneficiary costs as more seniors move from "young-old age" to "old-old age" (85 or older) and their health care needs rise. Because states would have to finance 100 percent of all costs above the cap, these added costs would put further significant pressure on state budgets, leading to even bigger Medicaid cuts over time.
See the details here (http://www.cbpp.org/blog/a-graphic-look-at-a-medicaid-per-capita-cap)


Treasurer Read Issues Statement on Sine Die
The Latest: Trump meets with Singapore’s prime minister
Advisor News
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
- A hybrid approach outperforms the 4% Rule, researchers find
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Securian Financial Increases Individual Life Retention to $10 Million, Strengthening Support for High-Net-Worth Life Insurance Market
- Americans without children are less confident about retirement, Allianz finds
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- DELAWARE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT DETAILS REVIEW OF BRIGHTHOUSE ACQUISITION
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
More Life Insurance News