Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance and Veterans' Group Life Insurance-Slayer's Rule Exclusion - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Editorial Staff
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
October 3, 2012 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance and Veterans’ Group Life Insurance–Slayer’s Rule Exclusion

Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its regulations governing Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and Veterans' Group Life Insurance (VGLI) to prohibit payment of insurance proceeds payable because of the death of a person whose life was insured under SGLI or VGLI (decedent) or payment of a SGLI Traumatic Injury Protection (TSGLI) benefit to a person who is convicted of intentionally and wrongfully killing the decedent or determined in a civil proceeding to have intentionally and wrongfully killed the decedent (slayer) and to any family member of the slayer. These provisions apply also to any person who assisted the slayer in causing the death of the decedent. Additionally, this document contains an interim final amendment that defines the term "member of the family" not to include a "domestic partner."

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective November 2, 2012.

Applicability Date: This rule is applicable to any claim for SGLI or VGLI proceeds, including a claim for a payment under 38 CFR 9.20, Traumatic injury protection, filed on or after November 2, 2012, and to any such claim filed before that date that has not been paid or denied as of that date.

Comment Date: Comments on the omission of the term "domestic partner" from the definition of a "member of the family" must be submitted by December 3, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to "RIN 2900-AN40--Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance and Veterans' Group Life Insurance--Slayer's Rule Exclusion." Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This is not a toll-free number.) In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Keitt, Attorney/Advisor, Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office and Insurance Center (310/290B), 5000 Wissahickon Avenue, P.O. Box 8079, Philadelphia, PA 19101, (215) 842-2000, ext. 2905. (This is not a toll-free number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 13, 2011, VA published in the Federal Register (76 FR 77455) a proposed rule to amend VA regulations governing the payment of SGLI or VGLI proceeds and benefit payments under the TSGLI program. Specifically, VA proposed to amend 38 CFR 9.1 and 9.5 to prohibit payment of SGLI or VGLI proceeds or a TSGLI benefit to: (1) A person who is convicted of intentionally killing the decedent or determined in a civil proceeding to have intentionally killed the decedent (known hereafter as the "slayer"); (2) a member of the slayer's family who is not related to the decedent by blood, legal adoption, or marriage; and (3) a member of the slayer's family who is related to the decedent by blood, legal adoption, or marriage and is convicted of a crime involving the intentional killing of the decedent or determined in a civil proceeding to have been involved in the intentional killing of the decedent.

Interested persons were invited to submit written comments on or before February 13, 2012. We received one comment, from Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) concerning the terms used in, and the complexity of some of the language of, the proposed regulation. Based on internal agency reconsideration of the proposed regulation and the comment received from VVA, VA is making the following changes to the proposed rule.

First, VVA recommended adding the words "and wrongfully" and "and wrongful" as part of the descriptions provided in proposed SEC 9.5(e)(2)(i) and (iii), respectively. VA agrees with VVA's recommendation to include the words "and wrongfully" in SEC 9.5(e)(2)(i) because those words speak to the heinous aspect of the slayer's act that violates public policy. In order to be consistent, we will also add "and wrongfully" to SEC 9.1(l). In addition, this language is consistent with the language used in 38 CFR 3.11, which prohibits the payment of certain VA benefits to "[a]ny person who has intentionally and wrongfully caused the death of another person" if the benefits would be payable by reason of that death. The language of 38 CFR 3.11 serves as an appropriate model for the SGLI and VGLI Slayer's Rule Exclusion. However, VA did not incorporate the words "and wrongful" into proposed SEC 9.5(e)(2)(iii) because that provision has been completely revised in accordance with VVA's second recommendation to prohibit payment of insurance benefits to the family members of either the slayer or anyone who aided or assisted the slayer in causing the death of the decedent.

Second, VVA recommended simplifying the language of proposed SEC 9.5(e)(2) to make the regulation easier to understand as it relates to the persons who are prohibited from receiving insurance proceeds and benefits. VA agrees with VVA's suggestion and has modified the language of SEC 9.5(e)(2) to clarify the intent of the proposed rule that the slayer, anyone who assists the slayer in causing the death of the decedent, and the family members of the slayer or anyone who assists the slayer be prohibited from receiving insurance proceeds or benefits payable because of the decedent's death. Although proposed SEC 9.5(e)(2) included anyone who is convicted or found civilly liable for the death of the decedent, which would imply inclusion of an accomplice, the modified rule language removes any ambiguity regarding the inclusion of an accomplice under SEC 9.5(e)(2).

Third, VVA suggested changing the term "surviving spouse" in proposed SEC 9.5(e)(4)(i)(B) with the term "widow or widower" to make the reference consistent with the terms used in Chapter 19 of title 38, United States Code (U.S.C.). VA agrees with this suggestion and has altered the regulatory text accordingly. Use of the term "widow or widower" is consistent with the language of 38 U.S.C. 1970(a), which provides the order of preference for payments of SGLI and VGLI proceeds.

Finally, based on internal agency review, VA is removing proposed SEC 9.1(l)(6), which included "[d]omestic partner" as a "member of the family" for purposes of the provisions in SEC 9.5(e)(2), due to the unsettled legal landscape surrounding the recognition of such partnerships. Because recognition of the legality of such relationships varies from state to state, VA has determined that including such partnerships in this part would cause an undue administrative burden. The public is invited to comment on the omission of the term "domestic partner" from the definition of a "member of the family."

For the reasons discussed above, VA is adopting the proposed rule as a final rule with the above-noted changes.

Administrative Procedure Act

Regarding the interim final amendment that defines the term "member of the family" within this final rule at 38 CFR 9.1(l) not to include a "domestic partner," we find, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), that there is good cause to dispense with advance public notice. As noted above, the legal landscape surrounding the recognition of such partnerships is unsettled. Therefore, at this time, the term's inclusion in the definition of a "member of the family" would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Accordingly, VA is issuing this final rule with an interim final amendment to omit the term "domestic partner" from SEC 9.1(l).

Unfunded Mandates

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any year. This final rule will have no such effect on State, local, and tribal governments or on the private sector.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a "significant regulatory action," which requires review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as "any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order."

--This is a summary of a Federal Register article originally published on the page number listed below--

Final rule.

CFR Part: "38 CFR Part 9"

RIN Number: "RIN 2900-AN40"

Citation: "77 FR 60304"

Federal Register Page Number: "60304"

"Rules and Regulations"

Copyright:  (c) 2012 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.
Wordcount:  1596

Older

Best’s Review Webinar Examines Liability Exposures for Nonprofit Organizations

Newer

State Auto Names Bob Cohen Business Development Director

Advisor News

  • NAIFA: Financial professionals are essential to the success of Trump Accounts
  • Changes, personalization impacting retirement plans for 2026
  • Study asks: How do different generations approach retirement?
  • LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
  • Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Ancient Financial Launches as a Strategic Asset Management and Reinsurance Holding Company, Announces Agreement to Acquire F&G Life Re Ltd.
  • FIAs are growing as the primary retirement planning tool
  • Edward Wilson Joins SEDA, Bringing Deep Expertise in Risk Management, Derivatives Trading and Institutional Prime Brokerage
  • Trademark Application for “INSPIRING YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
  • Jackson Financial ramps up reinsurance strategy to grow annuity sales
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • HEALTH INSURER FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN 2024
  • THREE CONGRESSIONAL MISSTEPS ON HEALTHCARE
  • PORTER: 'WE CAN FIGHT FRAUD WITHOUT IMPACTING HOOSIERS' COVERAGE'
  • REP. AGUILAR ANNOUNCES DR. CAMEO CARTER, M.D. AS 2026 STATE OF THE UNION GUEST
  • WELCH TO BRING VERMONTER HIT BY SKYROCKETING HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS TO STATE OF THE UNION
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Revises Outlook on Germany’s Non-Life Insurance Segment to Stable
  • Brighthouse Financial Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results
  • Genworth Financial Announces Fourth Quarter 2025 Results
  • Corporate PACs vs. Silicon Valley
  • IUL tax strategy at center of new lawsuit filed in South Carolina
Sponsor
More Life Insurance News

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

More Top Read Stories >

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Elevate Your Practice with Pacific Life
Taking your business to the next level is easier when you have experienced support.

LIMRA’s Distribution and Marketing Conference
Attend the premier event for industry sales and marketing professionals

Get up to 1,000 turning 65 leads
Access your leads, plus engagement results most agents don’t see.

What if Your FIA Cap Didn’t Reset?
CapLock™ removes annual cap resets for clearer planning and fewer surprises.

Press Releases

  • ICMG Announces 2026 Don Kampe Lifetime Achievement Award Recipient
  • RFP #T22521
  • Hexure Launches First Fully Digital NIGO Resubmission Workflow to Accelerate Time to Issue
  • RFP #T25221
  • LIDP Named Top Digital-First Insurance Solution 2026 by Insurance CIO Outlook
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet