Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance and Veterans’ Group Life Insurance–Slayer’s Rule Exclusion
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
SUMMARY: The
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective
Applicability Date: This rule is applicable to any claim for SGLI or VGLI proceeds, including a claim for a payment under 38 CFR 9.20, Traumatic injury protection, filed on or after
Comment Date: Comments on the omission of the term "domestic partner" from the definition of a "member of the family" must be submitted by
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations Management (02REG),
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
Interested persons were invited to submit written comments on or before
First, VVA recommended adding the words "and wrongfully" and "and wrongful" as part of the descriptions provided in proposed
Second, VVA recommended simplifying the language of proposed
Third, VVA suggested changing the term "surviving spouse" in proposed
Finally, based on internal agency review, VA is removing proposed
For the reasons discussed above, VA is adopting the proposed rule as a final rule with the above-noted changes.
Administrative Procedure Act
Regarding the interim final amendment that defines the term "member of the family" within this final rule at 38 CFR 9.1(l) not to include a "domestic partner," we find, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), that there is good cause to dispense with advance public notice. As noted above, the legal landscape surrounding the recognition of such partnerships is unsettled. Therefore, at this time, the term's inclusion in the definition of a "member of the family" would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Accordingly, VA is issuing this final rule with an interim final amendment to omit the term "domestic partner" from
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a "significant regulatory action," which requires review by the
--This is a summary of a
Final rule.
CFR Part: "38 CFR Part 9"
RIN Number: "RIN 2900-AN40"
Citation: "77 FR 60304"
Federal Register Page Number: "60304"
"Rules and Regulations"
| Copyright: | (c) 2012 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1596 |



Best’s Review Webinar Examines Liability Exposures for Nonprofit Organizations
State Auto Names Bob Cohen Business Development Director
Advisor News
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
- 73% of US business leaders say economic uncertainty keeps them from focusing on transition
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- What advisors need to know about the life settlement boom
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- IRI, ACLU express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
- Best’s Special Report: U.S. Life/Annuity Industry Sees Bottom-Line Growth Despite 18% Decline in Total Income in First-Quarter 2026
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- HAYES INTRODUCES BILL TO LOWER COSTS FOR TELEHEALTH PATIENTS
- NEW URGENCY TO ADDRESS ROOT CAUSES OF AFFORDABILITY CRISIS AS HEALTHCARE SPENDING HITS RECORD $5.7T
- Workplace pilot will support employees with celiac disease
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
- Connecticut retirees face high savings hurdles
- AI-created images in insurance fraud and the impacts on clients, advisors
- Roberts Disability Law Sues Unum Life Insurance Company of America on Behalf of Disabled Valero Refinery Operator for Allegedly Underpaying Long-Term Disability Benefits
More Life Insurance News