Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities, Revisions to Operator Identification (OPID) Assignment Request and Operator Registry Notification
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Notice and request for comments.
Citation: "79 FR 18118"
Document Number: "Docket No. PHMSA-2014-0018"
"Notices"
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in the following ways:
E-Gov Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the public to enter comments on any
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility;
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground level of DOT,
Instructions: Identify the docket number, PHMSA-2014-0018, at the beginning of your comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. You should know that anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). Therefore, you may want to review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Docket: For access to the docket or to read background documents or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Room W12-140 on the ground level of DOT,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests. This notice identifies a revised information collection request that PHMSA will be submitting to OMB for approval. The information collected from OPID Assignment Request forms and Operator Registry Notification forms is an important tool for identifying new operators and changes to existing pipeline systems as set forth in 49 CFR 191.22 and 195.64.
A. Proposed Changes to the OPID Request Form
PHMSA is proposing to revise the OPID Assignment Request Form (PHMSA F 1000.1) to:
(1) Align the gas distribution and gas transmission commodity choices with those found on the annual and incident reports. Consistent commodity categories across all report forms would enhance PHMSA and our state partners' understanding of gas pipeline facilities.
(2) Modify the list for types of gas distribution operators to reflect the ownership structure of the operator. The current list is a mix of ownership structure and commodity. Commodity values are entered elsewhere on the form. This change would allow PHMSA and our state partners to better determine ownership structure without commodity data mixed in to ensure regulatory efforts are directed to the proper entities.
(3) Collect the miles of pipe and facility descriptions for each state. PHMSA and our state partners would gain a better understanding of the new operators' pipeline facilities through this state-by-state reporting.
(4) Eliminate liquefied natural gas (LNG) plans and procedures as a separate safety program type. LNG plans and procedures are equivalent to the operating, maintenance, and emergencies program type. The pipeline system types (i.e., LNG, gas distribution, hazardous liquid, etc.) are collected elsewhere on the form. This change would remove a redundancy from this form.
(5) Collect business cell phone numbers for contacts in addition to office phone numbers. Having both phone numbers would enhance the ability of PHMSA and our state partners to communicate with new operators.
Several changes are proposed for the instructions to enable the changes listed above, provide additional clarity, and reflect that the validation process has ended. These changes would allow operators to complete the form quickly and accurately.
B. Proposed Changes to the Operator Registry Notification
PHMSA is proposing to revise the Operator Registry Notification Form (PHMSA F 1000.2) to:
(1) Remove and revise instructions regarding pipeline safety program information submissions at several locations in the form and instructions. For example, over the past year, PHMSA has found many operators erroneously submitted Type C notifications based on these confusing instructions. These revisions would help operators avoid submitting unnecessary notifications that must later be retracted.
(2) Reduce the number of notification types and the text describing each type to enhance clarity. The current form provides a type for each regulatory requirement for notification submission. Instead of selecting one of three types for gas or liquid construction, we are proposing a single type. Details about the construction project are collected in Step 3 of the form. This would reduce operator confusion about which notification type should be submitted and eliminate a needless distinction in PHMSA's data.
(3) Require Type B notifications to indicate whether the operator is assuming or ceasing operatorship of pipeline facilities. PHMSA has to rely on the "reason for change" text field to determine which applies to the Type B notifications submitted to date. In some cases, the text field does not explain the type of change. This change would require operators to submit the information needed by PHMSA to process the operator's notification properly.
(4) Require separate notifications for an acquisition and a divestiture. Only one set of gas distribution pipeline facilities can be reported in Step 3 of the current form. If an operator were to select both acquisition and divestiture in Step 2, we would not know which gas distribution pipeline facilities were acquired and which were divested. In Step 3, gas gathering, gas transmission, and hazardous liquid pipeline facilities can be reported as acquired or divested. By restricting each notification to either acquisition or divestiture, we can eliminate half of the data fields required for gas gathering, gas transmission, and hazardous liquid pipeline facilities in Step 3 and insure that we are interpreting an operator's notification accurately.
(5) Allow an operator submitting a divestiture to request the deactivation of their OPID. If an operator no longer has regulated pipeline facilities, PHMSA deactivates the OPID. This informs our internal staff and our state partners that the OPID is no longer responsible for any regulated pipeline facilities. Under the current form and instructions, such operators are encouraged to contact PHMSA regarding deactivation. Including the ability to request deactivation in the notification would result in more efficient communication about operators with no remaining regulated pipeline facilities.
(6) Align the gas distribution and gas transmission commodity choices with those found on the annual and incident reports. Consistent commodity categories across all report forms would enhance PHMSA's and our state partners' understanding of gas pipeline facilities.
(7) Collect data about miles of pipeline separate from facilities, such as breakout tanks, storage fields, and compressor stations, in Step 3. This change is proposed in conjunction with reducing the number of construction notification types. Instead of selecting a type corresponding to facilities, the operator would select the "generic" construction type and provide data about the facilities in Step 3. Under the current form, two separate notifications would be required. This change would allow an operator to submit a single construction notification for both pipeline miles and facilities, making compliance easier for operators.
(8) Require operators to provide data about pipeline facilities (Step 3) when they submit a change in entity operating (Type B) notification. Currently, an operator provides notification of a change in the entity operating but submits no information about the pipeline facilities affected by the change. By collecting pipeline facility information, PHMSA and our state partners would understand the scope of the operating entity change.
(9) Collect the miles of pipe and facility descriptions for each state. PHMSA and our state partners would gain a better understanding of the pipeline facilities covered by a notification through this state-by-state reporting.
Several changes are proposed for the instructions to enable the changes listed above and provide additional clarity.
(10) Add a "Guidance for Selecting the Appropriate Notification Type" section to the instructions. The current instructions, both on the form and in the instruction document, have resulted in many operators submitting the incorrect type of notification. The new section summarizes the purpose of notification types and contains flow charts to guide operators to the correct type of notification based on the action they are taking. This new section would eliminate wasted time for operators submitting unnecessary notifications and needless PHMSA reviews.
II. Summary of Impacted Collection
The following information is provided for this information collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and (8) Frequency of collection. PHMSA requests comments on the following information collection, including the proposed revisions addressed in this notice. Copies of the proposed forms associated with this information collection can be found in Docket Number PHMSA-2014-0018.
Title:
OMB Control Number: 2137-0627.
Current Expiration Date: 12/31/2014.
Type of Request: Revision.
Abstract:
Affected Public: Natural gas, LNG, and liquid pipeline operators.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Total Annual Responses: 630.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 630.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Comments are invited on:
(a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.
Issued in
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-07075 Filed 3-28-14;
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1913 |


Advisor News
- 5 things I wish I knew before leaving my broker-dealer
- Global economic growth will moderate as the labor force shrinks
- Estate planning during the great wealth transfer
- Main Street families need trusted financial guidance to navigate the new Trump Accounts
- Are the holidays a good time to have a long-term care conversation?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
- Prudential launches FlexGuard 2.0 RILA
- Lincoln Financial Introduces First Capital Group ETF Strategy for Fixed Indexed Annuities
- Iowa defends Athene pension risk transfer deal in Lockheed Martin lawsuit
- Pension buy-in sales up, PRT sales down in mixed Q3, LIMRA reports
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Hong Kong’s Non-Life Insurance Segment Shows Growth and Resilience Amid Market Challenges
- Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
- Nearly Half of Americans More Stressed Heading into 2026, Allianz Life Study Finds
- New York Life Investments Expands Active ETF Lineup With Launch of NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA)
- LTC riders: More education is needed, NAIFA president says
More Life Insurance News