Health and Human Services Department Documents and Publications
Medicaid Program and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Revisions to the Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control and Payment Error Rate Measurement Programs
SUMMARY: This final rule implements provisions from the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) (Pub. L. 111-3) with regard to the Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) and Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) programs. This final rule also codifies several procedural aspects of the process for estimating improper payments in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on September 10, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Lindner, (410) 786-7481.
Jessica Woodard, (410) 786-9249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control Program
The Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) program is set forth in section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and requires States to report to the Secretary the ratio of States' erroneous excess payments for medical assistance to total expenditures for medical assistance. Section 1903(u) of the Act also sets a 3-percent threshold for improper payments in any fiscal year and the Secretary may withhold payments to States based on the amount of improper payments that exceed the threshold. The traditional MEQC program is based on State reviews of Medicaid cases identified through a statistically reliable Statewide sample of cases selected from the State's eligibility files and excludes separate CHIP programs. These reviews are conducted to determine whether the sampled cases meet applicable Medicaid eligibility requirements.
B. The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002
The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 (IPIA), (Pub. L. 107-300, enacted on November 26, 2002) requires the heads of Federal agencies to annually review programs they oversee to determine if they are susceptible to significant erroneous payments. If any programs are found to be susceptible to significant improper payments, then the agency must estimate the amount of improper payments, report those estimates to the Congress, and submit a report on actions the agency is taking to reduce erroneous expenditures. The IPIA directed the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to provide guidance on implementation. OMB defines "significant erroneous payments" as annual erroneous payments in the program exceeding both 2.5 percent of program payments and $10 million (OMB M-06-23, Appendix C to OMB Circular A-123, August 10, 2006). For those programs found to be susceptible to significant erroneous payments, Federal agencies must provide the estimated amount of improper payments and report on what actions the agency is taking to reduce them, including setting targets for future erroneous payment levels and a timeline by which the targets will be reached.
The Medicaid program and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) were identified as programs at risk for significant erroneous payments. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) reports the estimated error rates for the Medicaid and CHIP programs in its annual Agency Financial Report (AFR) to Congress.
C. Regulatory History
1. Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control Program
Sections 431.800 through 431.865 set forth the regulatory requirements for States to conduct the annual MEQC measurement. Currently, the MEQC program consists of the following:
* MEQC traditional--Operating MEQC under SEC 431.800 through SEC 431.865 and selecting a random sample of all Medicaid applicants and enrollees and reviewing them under guidance in the State Medicaid Manual.
* MEQC pilots--Operating MEQC under a special study or a target population and providing oversight to reduce and prevent errors and improve program administration.
* MEQC waivers--Operating MEQC as a part of a CMS approved section 1115 waiver and reviewing beneficiaries included in the research and demonstration project.
2. Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) Program
Section 1102(a) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to establish such rules and regulations as may be necessary for the efficient administration of the Medicaid and CHIP programs. The Medicaid statute at section 1902(a)(6) of the Act and the CHIP statute at section 2107(b)(1) of the Act require States to provide information that the Secretary finds necessary for the administration, evaluation, and verification of the States' programs. Also, section 1902(a)(27) of the Act (and SEC 457.950 of the regulations) requires providers to submit information regarding payments and claims as requested by the Secretary, State agency, or both. Under the authority of these provisions, we published a proposed rule in the August 27, 2004 Federal Register (69 FR 52620) to comply with the requirements of the IPIA and the OMB guidance. The proposed rule set forth provisions for all States to annually estimate improper payments in their Medicaid and CHIP programs and to report the State-specific error rates for purposes of our computing the national improper payment estimates for these programs.
In the October 5, 2005 Federal Register (70 FR 58260), we published an interim final rule with comment period (IFC). The IFC responded to public comments on the proposed rule, and informed the public of our national contracting strategy and of our plan to measure improper payments in a subset of States. Our State selection process ensures that a State is measured once, and only once, every 3 years for each program.
In response to the public comments from the October 5, 2005 IFC, we published a second IFC in the August 28, 2006 Federal Register (71 FR 51050). The IFC reiterated our national contracting strategy to estimate improper payments in both Medicaid and CHIP fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care, and set forth and invited further comments on State requirements for estimating improper payments due to errors in Medicaid and CHIP eligibility determinations. We also announced that a State's Medicaid and CHIP programs would be reviewed in the same year.
In the August 31, 2007 Federal Register (72 FR 50490), we published a final rule for the PERM program, which implements the IPIA requirements. The August 31, 2007 final rule responded to the public comments on the August 28, 2006 IFC and finalized State requirements for submitting claims to the Federal contactors that conduct FFS and managed care reviews. The August 31, 2007 final rule also finalized State requirements for conducting eligibility reviews and estimating payment error rates due to errors in eligibility determinations.
D. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009
On February 4, 2009, the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) (Pub. L. 111-3) was enacted. (Please note, as a result of this legislation, the program formerly known as the "State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)" is now referred to as the "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)"). Sections 203 and 601 of the CHIPRA relate to the PERM and MEQC programs.
Section 203 of the CHIPRA establishes an error rate measurement with respect to the enrollment of children under the Express Lane Eligibility option. The law directs States not to include children enrolled using the Express Lane Eligibility option in data or samples used for purposes of complying with the MEQC and PERM requirements. Provisions for States' Express Lane Eligibility option will be set forth in a future rulemaking document.
Section 601(a) of the CHIPRA provides for a 90 percent Federal match for CHIP expenditures related to PERM administration and excludes such expenditures from the 10 percent administrative cap. (Section 2105(c)(2) of the CHIP statute gives States the ability to use an amount up to 10 percent of the CHIP benefit expenditures for outreach efforts, additional services other than the standard benefit package for low-income children, and administrative costs.)
The CHIPRA requires a new PERM rule and delays any calculation of a PERM error rate for CHIP until 6 months after the new PERM rule is effective. Additionally, the CHIPRA provides that States that were scheduled for PERM measurement in fiscal year (FY) 2007 may elect to accept a CHIP PERM error rate determined in whole or in part on the basis of data for FY 2007, or may elect instead to consider its PERM measurement conducted for FY 2010 as the first fiscal year for which PERM applies to the State for CHIP. Similarly, the CHIPRA provides that States that were scheduled for PERM measurement in FY 2008 may elect to accept a CHIP PERM error rate determined in whole or in part on the basis of data for FY 2008, or may elect instead to consider its PERM measurement conducted for FY 2011 as the first fiscal year for which PERM applies to the State for CHIP.
The CHIPRA requires that the new PERM rule include the following:
* Clearly defined criteria for errors for both States and providers.
* Clearly defined processes for appealing error determinations.
* Clearly defined responsibilities and deadlines for States in implementing any corrective action plans.
* A provision that the payment error rate for a State will not include payment errors based on a State's verification of an applicant's self-declaration if a State's self-declaration verification policies meet regulations promulgated by the Secretary or are approved by the Secretary.
* State-specific sample sizes for application of the PERM requirements to CHIP PERM.
In addition, the CHIPRA shall harmonize the PERM and MEQC programs and provides States with the option to apply PERM data resulting from its eligibility reviews for meeting MEQC requirements and vice versa, with certain conditions.
E. CMS Response to the CHIPRA
--This is a summary of a Federal Register article originally published on the page number listed below--
Final rule.
CFR Part: "42 CFR Parts 431, 447, and 457"
RIN Number: "RIN 0938-AP69"
Citation: "75 FR 48816"
Document Number: "CMS-6150-F"
Federal Register Page Number: "48816"
"Rules and Regulations"



Advisor News
- Using digital retirement modeling to strengthen client understanding
- Fear of outliving money at a record high
- Cognitive decline is a growing threat to financial security
- Two lessons career changers wish they knew before starting the CFP journey
- Americans less confident about retirement as worries grow
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CareScout Joins Ensight™ Intelligent Quote LTC & Life Marketplace
- Axonic Insurance Annuities, Built for Banks, Broker-Dealers and RIAs, Now Available through WealthVest.
- Allianz Life Adds New Accumulation-Focused Fixed Index Annuities
- Allianz Life adds new accumulation-focused FIAs
- Industry objects to ‘tone and tenor’ of draft NAIC Annuity Buyer’s Guide
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- After health insurance subsidies end, 30,000 Idahoans will be uninsured, government report says
- Georgia’s ACA enrollment plunges, raising concerns for rural hospitals
- Pending cuts to Georgia Medicaid payments could affect children who need therapy
- Orange schools, teachers union at impasse over health insurance
- Miami judge sides with cancer patient, orders insurer to cover pricey treatment
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Agam Capital and 1823 Partners Announce Strategic Partnership to Provide Life Insurers with an End-to-End Value Chain Solution
- AM Best Revises Outlooks to Positive for Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries
- Principal Financial Group Announces First Quarter 2026 Results
- SBLI Enhances its OmniTrak Term to Deliver Faster Decisions, More Client Coverage, and Improved Pricing
- Life insurance premium surges, but coverage is still falling short for many
More Life Insurance News