Feds refused to file charges in Modesto bail bond case [The Modesto Bee]
| By Rosalio Ahumada, The Modesto Bee | |
| McClatchy-Tribune Information Services |
Special Agent
"I wouldn't say I was frustrated. I would say I was surprised," Tam said while on the witness stand Wednesday testifying in Pontillo's preliminary hearing. Tam now works as an investigator for the
Explaining his line of questioning to the judge, Carson argued that Tam was personally upset about Pontillo's confrontational attitude when the FBI agent interviewed the business owner in
Authorities had just served search warrants at Pontillo's business and home, and he was the focus of a federal investigation. Carson argued that Tam has held a grudge against Pontillo since then.
"His attitude toward me had no relevance in how I handled this investigation," Tam testified.
He said he wasn't disappointed when federal prosecutors decided not to proceed with charges against Pontillo. The 2008 interview with Pontillo, Tam said, didn't have any animosity. He remembered sharing a laugh with Pontillo over a Christmas ham.
Tam eventually presented the evidence he collected in the federal investigation to Stanislaus County Chief Deputy District Attorney
"I made no recommendations as to what should be charged," Tam testified. "I only presented the evidence."
Local charges filed
In
Another bail agent from the business,
Tam testified that he felt Pontillo wanted to drive down the bail bond premiums to gain a larger share of the market in Modesto. Pontillo told Tam that his business asked clients to pay a 2 percent bail bond premium and asked for the rest in credit payments.
"That was a way to get more business," Tam said. "
AJ's Bail Bonds incurred a cost of up to 2.2 percent of each bail bond sold.
One bail agent who once worked for Pontillo told Tam that about two clients each day owing the most money were picked up from the courthouse and brought to AJ's Bail Bonds. The former bail agent said he saw clients handcuffed at the office overnight until Pontillo arrived in the morning.
Tam testified that the clients were held at the business from two to five hours. Those who were cooperative were allowed to sit, while those who weren't were forced to stand while handcuffed.
Testimony in the preliminary hearing continues today in
Bee staff writer
___
(c)2012 The Modesto Bee (Modesto, Calif.)
Visit The Modesto Bee (Modesto, Calif.) at www.modbee.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
| Wordcount: | 581 |



New Flood Database Expands Insurers’ Knowledge of Risk
DWC Announces Insurance Carriers Performance Based Oversight Results
Advisor News
- Why aligning wealth and protection strategies will define 2026 planning
- Finseca and IAQFP announce merger
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Trademark Application for “SMART WEIGHTING” Filed: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Somerset Re Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer as Firm Builds on Record-Setting Year
- Indexing the industry for IULs and annuities
- United Heritage Life Insurance Company goes live on Equisoft’s cloud-based policy administration system
- Court fines Cutter Financial $100,000, requires client notice of guilty verdict
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- TrumpRx is here. What you should know
- Report: Health insurers denied one in five claims in 2024
- Tom Campbell: Is the cost of healthcare top election issue?
- 6 AOA ADVOCACY WINS IN 2025 THAT SET THE STAGE FOR 2026
- BIPARTISAN FORMER HHS SECRETARIES URGE STABILITY FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News