Combine Solicitation – DESK STUDY (DS): FOR RWANDA – U.S. -ACEF AMAHORO ENERGY SMALL HYDRO PROJECTS DS
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Notice Type: Combine Solicitation
Posted Date:
Office Address:
Subject: DESK STUDY (DS): FOR
Classification Code: R - Professional, administrative, and management support services
Solicitation Number: RFQ-PO201411082
Contact: Tyrone W Johnson, Contracting Officer, Phone 703-875-4357, Email tjohnson@ustda.gov -
Setaside: Total Small BusinessTotal Small Business
Place of Performance (address): Headquarters:
Place of Performance (zipcode): 22209
Place of Performance Country: US
Description:
USTDA Contracts Office
USTDA
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation: Request for quote: Solicitation Number: RFQ-PO201411082, Desk Study (DS) for
3. NOTICE REGARDING SUSPENSION/DEBARMENT/INELIGIBILITY: Any contract awarded to a contractor who, at the time of award was suspended, debarred, and ineligible for receipt of contract with Government Agencies or in receipt of a notice of proposed debarment from any
4. SAM DATABASE: All Contractors must be registered in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) and On-Line Representation and Certification (ORCA) database via https://www.sam.gov/portal/public /SAM/ in order to be eligible for contract award. Lack of registration in CCR will make an offeror ineligible for award as described in FAR 52.204-7. Do NOT delay submission of your offer pending receipt of a CAGE code.
5. SET-ASIDE: This procurement is a small business set-aside with a small business size standard of less than
6. HISTORICAL PRICING: The historical pricing for procurements of similar size and scope is at or about
7. DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK: Please see Attachment 1 to this RFQ. Vendors are reminded that failure to properly enroll in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR) system, On-Line Representation and Certification (ORCA) System, and provide accurate Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Tax Identification Number (TIN) information shall be excluded from award.
8. PROPOSED PRICE(S): Please submit proposed price(s) on the provided "Competitive Desk Study Cost Quotation Sheet" provide. Please see Attachment 2 to the RFQ.
9. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE: All services are subject to the COR's final approval. All work will be inspected and accepted at USTDA's Office,
10. DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE: The performance of this contract shall start immediately after the effective date of award. The Contractor shall submit all deliverables under this Contract to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) on or about
11. SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS: This solicitation includes the following additional contract requirements and terms and conditions:
* CONTRACTOR FOLLOW-ON (INELIGIBILITY). The Contractor and its subcontractors shall be ineligible to compete for, as a prime or subcontractor or otherwise, USTDA funded activities that result from this contract. USTDA reserves the right to grant a waiver, based upon FAR 9.503, if preclusion of the contractor or its subcontractors from the follow-on activity would not be in the Government's interest. This restriction shall remain in effect for three years from the completion of this contract. The contractor agrees to include this provision in all subcontracts to this contract.
12. CONTRACT CLAUSES: The clauses at 52.214-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items and 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items, apply to this acquisition. The following additional clauses are included: FAR 52.204-7, Central Contractor Registration and FAR 52.252-2,
13. INSTRUTIONS/CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS: The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions of Offerors-Commerical, applies to this acquisition with the following addition: * Technical Proposal, not exceeding 20 pages, that documents their Technical/Financial Expertise and Desk Study Strategy/Approach (as outlined below in the evaluation factors for award), resumes for proposed key employees (not included in 20 page count), and reference information for at least one but not more than three clients for similar work in the last three years (not included in 20 page count). * In addition, the contractor shall provide completed Contractor Employee Biographical Data Sheets (See Attachment 3) and/or resume for proposed key personnel.
14. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD: FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation, Commercial Items (available at www.acquisition.gov under FAR), is being used. The following factors, in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate all offers. All evaluation factors, other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important that cost or price. (1) TECHNICAL: The following sub-factors are listed in descending order of importance.
Sub-factor 1: Relevant technical experience and knowledge of small hydro power projects; Sub-factor 2: Relevant experience in evaluating and developing international projects, including experience drafting Terms of References and budgets for studies, experience with relevant financing mechanisms, prior project/sector experience in country of this proposed project, and knowledge of region;
Sub-Factor 3: Work plan, including strategy to evaluate the U.S. export potential. (2) PAST PERFORMANCE (3) PRICE
All evaluation factors, other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price. The Government will evaluate price to determine the following: * Completeness: All information required by the solicitation has been submitted and is accurate.
15. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: The Government will use Best Value Source Selection Procedures to evaluate offers and determine the best value. The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation, as supplemented, who's proposal conforms to the RFQ requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation) and is determined, based on the evaluation factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives USTDA the greatest confidence that it will best meet or exceed the requirement affordably. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and the Contracting Officer reasonably determines that the technical approach of the higher priced offeror outweighs the cost difference.
Link/URL: https://www.fbo.gov/spg/TDA/TDACO/TDACO/RFQ-PO201411082/listing.html
| Copyright: | (c) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1340 |


Advisor News
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
- Navigating client communication in a digital age
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Farm Bureau P&C insurers post first underwriting gain since 2021
- Legacy Marketing, Malibu Life launch two fixed indexed annuities
- Changing client priorities are reshaping annuity conversations
- Solen Software acquires annuity software provider Cooperative Technologies
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- As Children’s Mercy is dropped by ACA Marketplace, MO insurance group makes statement
- Health insurance open enrollment starts in Mass. as coverage concerns grow. How to get help
- Kraft Heinz, Aramark sue UnitedHealth over ‘bogus’ health claims
- Minnesota seniors navigating ‘incredibly complex’ system for Medicare Advantage
- WRH leaves UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage network
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News