2Q24 Basel III Regulatory Capital Disclosures Report
800-522-4100 • Valley.com
© 2024
CONTENTS
|
||
VI. |
General Disclosures for Counterparty Credit Risk-Related Exposures |
12 |
Counterparty Credit Risk Management |
12 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
13 |
|
VII. |
Credit Risk Mitigation |
14 |
General Credit Risk Mitigation |
14 |
|
Credit Concentrations |
14 |
|
VIII. |
Securitization |
16 |
IX. |
Equities Not Subject to Market Risk Rule |
16 |
Equity Risk |
16 |
|
Book Value and Fair Value of Equity Exposures Not Subject to the Market Risk Rule |
16 |
|
Capital Requirements of Equity Investment Exposures by Risk-Weighting |
17 |
|
X. |
Interest Rate Risk for Non-Trading Activities |
17 |
Appendix |
19 |
2 | Page
INTRODUCTION
Background
Valley's principal subsidiary,
The Bank also provides convenient account access to customers through a number of account management services, including access to more than 200 branch locations across
Valley's consolidated subsidiaries include the Bank, as well as subsidiaries with the following primary functions: insurance agencies offering property and casualty, life and health insurance; asset management advisers that are registered as investment advisers with the
This document, along with Valley's public filings, present the Regulatory Capital Disclosures in compliance with Basel III1 as set forth in 12 CFR 217.63 - Disclosures (Pillar III) by institutions regulated by the
Forward-Looking Statements
The foregoing contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are not historical facts and include expressions about management's confidence and strategies and management's expectations about our business, new and existing programs and products, acquisitions, relationships, opportunities, taxation, technology, market conditions and economic expectations. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as "intend," "should," "expect," "believe," "view," "opportunity," "allow," "continues," "reflects," "would," "could," "typically," "usually," "anticipate," "may," "estimate," "outlook," "project" or similar statements or variations of such terms. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to those risk factors disclosed under the "Risk Factors" section in Part I, Item 1A on Valley's Annual Report.
- Basel III or "the Capital Rule"
3 | Page
I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION
General
The Capital Rule applies to Valley, the Bank and all other entities in which Valley has controlling interest. Valley's consolidated subsidiaries include the Bank, as well as subsidiaries with the following primary functions: insurance agencies offering property and casualty, life and health insurance; asset management advisers that are registered investment advisers with the
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Valley include the accounts of the Bank and all other entities in which Valley has a controlling financial interest. The accounting and reporting policies of Valley conform to GAAP and general practices within the financial services industry. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, Valley does not consolidate statutory trusts established for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and related trust common securities.
Restrictions on the Transfer of Funds or Total Capital
This section does not apply to Valley, as it does not have restrictions on the transfer of funds or capital as of
Capital Requirements
Regulatory capital ratios for Valley and the Bank were above the regulatory requirement ratios under the Capital Rule at
II. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Summary of Capital
Valley and the Bank are subject to the regulatory capital requirements administered by the
4 | Page
Regulatory Capital Tiers
The following table presents Valley's and
Table 1: Regulatory Capital Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Regulatory Capital Components |
|
|
Valley |
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and surplus (net of treasury stock) |
$ |
5,174,283 |
$ |
5,347,422 |
||
Retained earnings (including CECL add-back) |
|
|
1,528,196 |
|
|
2,129,052 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net |
|
|
(162,613) |
|
|
(162,202) |
Regulatory adjustments and deductions made to CET1 |
|
|
(1,864,231) |
|
|
(1,856,920) |
Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
4,675,635 |
|
|
5,457,352 |
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Preferred Stock
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital
Tier 1 Capital
Total Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying subordinated debt
Qualifying allowance for loan and lease losses
Non-qualifying capital instruments subject to phase out from Tier 2 Capital
209,691-
(159)-
4,885,1675,457,352
565,000-
445,758445,758
59,000-
Total Risk-based Capital |
$ |
5,954,925 |
|
$ |
5,903,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Internal Capital Adequacy Process
Valley exercises prudent capital management to maintain capital levels that adequately support its strategic initiatives and business activities.
Valley's Board performs its risk oversight function through several standing committees, including the Board Risk Committee. The Board Risk Committee supports the Board's oversight of management's enterprise-wide risk management framework and risk culture, which are each intended to align with Valley's strategic plan. The Board Risk Committee also determines the appropriateness of Valley's capital levels in consideration of its business activities, growth objectives, and risk appetite.
Management utilizes the enterprise-wide risk management framework to holistically manage and monitor risks across the organization and to aggregate and manage the risk appetite approved by the Board. The Board Risk Committee also recommends to the Board acceptable risk tolerances related to strategic, credit, interest rate, price, liquidity, compliance, operational (including cybersecurity risk), and reputation risks, oversees risk management within those tolerances and monitors compliance with applicable laws and regulations. With guidance from and oversight by the Board Risk Committee, management continually refines and enhances its risk management policies, procedures, and monitoring programs to adapt to changing risks.
While Valley is no longer required to publish Company-run annual stress tests under the Dodd-Frank Act, it continues to internally run stress tests of its capital position that are subject to review by Valley's primary regulators in efforts to appropriately monitor capital adequacy under stressful environments. Further, Valley makes every effort to ensure
5 | Page
that its capital ratios will remain in excess of required minimums and at levels that adequately protect Valley during times of potential stress.
Components of Risk-Weighted Assets
The following table presents Valley's standardized approach risk-weighted assets as of
Table 2: Standardized Approach Risk-Weighted Assets
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Standardized Approach Risk-Weighted Assets |
|
|
Valley |
|
|
|
|
Exposures to sovereign entities |
|
|
483,050 |
Exposures to depository institutions, foreign banks, and credit unions |
|
|
271,590 |
Exposures to public sector entities |
|
|
151,715 |
Corporate exposures |
|
|
33,578,286 |
Residential mortgage exposures |
|
|
3,586,234 |
Statutory multifamily mortgages and pre-sold construction loans |
|
|
6,299,035 |
High volatility commercial real estate loans |
|
|
29,879 |
Past due loans |
|
|
425,136 |
Other assets |
|
|
4,069,444 |
Equity exposures |
|
|
55,503 |
Total Risk-Weighted Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
48,949,872 |
IV.CAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER AND CAPITAL RATIOS
Capital Conservation Buffer
The Basel III rules require Valley and the Bank to have a minimum Capital Conservation Buffer (CCB) of 2.5% in addition to the minimum required risk-weighted asset ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of (i) CET1 to risk-weighted assets, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets or (iii) Total capital to risk-weighted assets above the respective minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall. Basel III also requires deductions from and adjustments to its various capital components. The CCB is calculated as the lowest of the (i) CET1 ratio less the CET1 stated minimum ratio requirement, (ii) Tier 1 ratio less the Tier 1 stated minimum ratio requirement, and (iii) Total capital ratio less the Total capital stated minimum ratio requirement. Valley and the Bank both surpass the CCB requirements. Valley's capital ratios were all above the minimum levels required to be considered a "well-capitalized" financial institution as of
The maximum dollar amount that a banking organization can pay in the form of discretionary bonus payments or capital distributions during the current quarter is equal to the maximum payout ratio multiplied by the banking organization's eligible retained income. Eligible retained income is defined for Basel III as the greater of a banking organization's net income (as reported in the banking organization's quarterly regulatory reports) for the four quarters preceding the current quarter, net of any capital distributions and associated tax effects not already reflected in net income or the average of the most recent four quarters' net income. Valley had
6 | Page
Valley is not subject to any limitations on its capital distributions or discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, as its capital levels exceeded defined minimums, inclusive of the capital conservation buffer, at
Regulatory Capital Ratios
The following table presents the regulatory capital ratios and related capital requirements for Valley and the Bank at
Table 3: Regulatory Capital Ratios
|
|
Minimum |
Capital Conservation |
|
|
|
Actual Ratio |
Capital Ratio |
Buffer |
|
Conservation Buffer |
Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.55% |
7.00% |
5.05% |
|
2.50% |
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital |
9.98 |
8.50 |
3.98 |
* |
2.50 |
Total Risk-based Capital |
12.17 |
10.50 |
4.17 |
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.15 |
7.00 |
6.65 |
|
2.50 |
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital |
11.15 |
8.50 |
5.15 |
|
2.50 |
Total Risk-based Capital |
12.06 |
10.50 |
4.06 |
* |
2.50 |
- The capital conservation buffers for Valley and the Bank are 3.98% and 4.06%, respectively, at
June 30, 2024 .
. -
- CREDIT RISK: GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Credit Risk Management
For all of its loan types, Valley adheres to a credit policy designed to minimize credit risk while generating the maximum income given the level of risk appetite. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis with subsequent approval by the Board annually. Credit authority relating to a significant dollar percentage of the overall portfolio is centralized and controlled by the
Valley's historical and current loan underwriting practice prohibits the origination of payment option adjustable residential mortgages which allow for negative interest amortization and subprime loans. Virtually all of our residential mortgage loan originations in recent years have conformed to rules requiring documentation of income, assets sufficient to close the transactions and debt to income ratios that support the borrower's ability to repay under the loan's proposed terms and conditions. These rules are applied to all loans originated for retention in our portfolio or for sale in the secondary market.
See Item 1 "Business" and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements of Valley's Annual Report and Note 7 to its Quarterly Report for the quarter ended
Valley maintains an ACL for financial assets measured at amortized cost. The ACL consists of the allowance for loan losses unfunded loan commitments (together, the "allowance of credit losses for loans"), and the allowance for credit losses for held to maturity securities. The estimate of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is based on relevant information about the past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amounts. Our methodology to establish the allowance for loan losses has two basic components: (i) a collective reserve component for estimated expected credit losses for pools of loans that share common risk characteristics and (ii) an individual reserve component for loans that do not share risk characteristics, consisting of collateral dependent loans. Valley also maintains a separate allowance for unfunded
7 | Page
credit commitments mainly consisting of undisbursed non-cancellable lines of credit, new loan commitments and commercial standby letters of credit.
Valley estimates the collective ACL using a current expected credit losses methodology which is based on relevant information about historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the loan balances. In estimating the component of the allowance on a collective basis, we use a transition matrix model which calculates an expected life of loan loss percentage for each loan pool by generating probability of default and loss given default metrics. The metrics are based on the migration of loans within the commercial and industrial loan categories from performing to loss by credit quality rating or delinquency categories using historical life-of-loan analysis periods for each loan portfolio pool and the severity of loss based on the aggregate net lifetime losses. The model's expected losses based on loss history are adjusted for qualitative factors. Among other things, these adjustments include and account for differences in: (i) the impact of the reasonable and supportable economic forecast, relative probability weightings and reversion period, (ii) other asset specific risks to the extent that they do not exist in the historical loss information, and (iii) net expected recoveries of charged-off loan balances. These adjustments are based on qualitative factors not reflected in the quantitative model but are likely to impact the measurement of estimated credit losses. The expected lifetime loss rate is the life of loan loss percentage from the transition matrix model plus the impact of the adjustments for qualitative factors. The expected credit losses are the product of multiplying the model's expected lifetime loss rate by the exposure at default at period end on an undiscounted basis.
Valley utilizes a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period followed by a one-year period over which estimated losses revert to historical loss experience for the remaining life of the loan on a straight-line basis. The forecasts consist of a multi-scenario economic forecast model to estimate future credit losses and are governed by a cross-functional committee. The committee meets each quarter to determine which economic scenarios developed by Moody's will be incorporated into the model, as well as the relative probability weightings of the selected scenarios, based upon all readily available information. The model projects economic variables under each scenario based on detailed statistical analyses. We have identified and selected key variables that most closely correlated to our historical credit performance, which include GDP, unemployment and the Case-Shiller Home Price Index.
For further discussion regarding CECL methodology and information regarding Valley's policy for determining past due or delinquency status, placing loans on non-accrual, returning loans to accrual status, and charging-off uncollectible amounts, refer to "Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans" section in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of Valley's Annual Report and the "Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans" section in Part I, Item 2 to its Quarterly Report for the quarter ended
Credit Risk Exposures
The following tables provide the exposure information for the credit portfolios including on- and off-balance sheet exposures, debt securities, and derivatives as of
Table 4: On-Balance Sheet Credit Risk Exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ |
in thousands) |
On-Balance Sheet Exposures Type |
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
9,479,147 |
$ |
9,173,875 |
Commercial real estate |
|
28,223,123 |
|
28,237,513 |
Construction |
|
3,554,473 |
|
3,526,421 |
Residential Mortgage |
|
5,638,250 |
|
5,631,214 |
Consumer |
|
3,436,596 |
|
3,451,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total on-balance sheet |
$ |
50,331,589 |
$ |
50,020,901 |
Less: Loans held for sale |
|
19,887 |
|
23,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan portfolio |
$ |
50,311,702 |
$ |
49,997,846 |
8 | Page
Table 5: Off-Balance Sheet,
|
($ |
in thousands) |
Exposures |
Total |
|
Total on-balance sheet |
$ |
50,331,589 |
Commitments under commercial loans and lines of credit |
|
10,576,157 |
Home equity and other revolving lines of credit |
|
1,675,984 |
Standby letters of credit |
|
509,980 |
Outstanding residential mortgage loan commitments |
|
73,903 |
Commitments under unused lines of credit-credit card |
|
142,136 |
Commitments to sell loans |
|
31,372 |
Commercial letters of credit |
|
25,458 |
|
|
|
Total off-balance sheet |
|
13,034,990 |
Total investment securities |
|
5,936,630 |
Derivatives |
|
781,722 |
Total credit risk exposure |
$ |
70,084,931 |
The following table presents the distribution of credit exposure by geography as of
Table 6: Credit Exposures by Geography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
State |
Commercial and |
|
Commercial Real |
|
Residential |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
|
Industrial |
|
Estate |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
$ |
2,226,189 |
$ |
10,198,421 |
$ |
1,521,368 |
$ |
982,393 |
$ |
14,928,371 |
|
|
2,715,046 |
|
8,882,632 |
|
1,472,449 |
|
560,609 |
|
13,630,736 |
|
|
1,839,945 |
|
6,517,740 |
|
1,888,185 |
|
1,143,197 |
|
11,389,067 |
|
|
480,873 |
|
1,026,946 |
|
101,268 |
|
32,429 |
|
1,641,516 |
|
|
372,910 |
|
368,746 |
|
4,642 |
|
23,414 |
|
769,712 |
|
|
65,299 |
|
437,449 |
|
36,875 |
|
82,593 |
|
622,216 |
Other |
|
1,778,885 |
|
4,345,662 |
|
613,463 |
|
611,961 |
|
7,349,971 |
Total |
|
9,479,147 |
|
31,777,596 |
|
5,638,250 |
|
3,436,596 |
|
50,331,589 |
Less: Loans held for |
|
- |
|
8,750 |
|
11,137 |
|
- |
|
19,887 |
sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan portfolio |
$ |
9,479,147 |
$ |
31,768,846 |
$ |
5,627,113 |
$ |
3,436,596 |
$ |
50,311,702 |
9 | Page
The following table presents the distribution of credit exposure by industry as of
Table 7: Credit Exposure by Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Percent of Total |
Commercial and industrial |
|
9,479,147 |
19% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
Non owner-occupied |
|
13,710,015 |
27% |
Multifamily |
|
8,976,264 |
18% |
Owner occupied |
|
5,536,844 |
11% |
Total |
|
28,223,123 |
56% |
Construction |
|
3,545,723 |
7% |
Total commercial real estate loans |
|
31,768,846 |
63% |
Residential mortgage |
|
5,627,113 |
11% |
Consumer |
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
566,467 |
1% |
Automobile |
|
1,762,852 |
4% |
Other consumer |
|
1,107,277 |
2% |
Total consumer loans |
|
3,436,596 |
7% |
Total loan portfolio |
$ |
50,311,702 |
100% |
Net loan charge-offs totaled
While the amount of net loan charge-off has increased in the second quarter 2024, the relatively low level of individual loan charge-offs has continued to trend within management's expectations for the credit quality of the loan portfolio at
The allowance for credit losses for loans, comprised of our allowance for loan losses and unfunded credit commitments, as a percentage of total loans was 1.06 percent at
The allowance for unfunded credit commitments declined to
Valley's provision for credit losses could remain elevated during the remainder of 2024 due to several factors, including, but not limited to the impact of future change in (1) our economic outlook, (2) the overall performance of our loan portfolio, (3) potential downgrades in the internal risk classification of commercial loans and (4) the composition of our loan portfolio, including targeted growth in loan categories not secured by real estate such as commercial and industrial loans.
For additional information regarding the allowance for credit losses for loans, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements of Valley's Annual Report and Note 7 to its Quarterly Report for the quarter ended
10 | Page
Attachments
Disclaimer
Trump signals interest in influencing Federal Reserve decisions if he regains White House
Wall Street slips after morning rally evaporates Wall Street slips after a morning rally evaporates as some of the market's AI darlings drop
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News