York Daily Record, Pa., Mike Argento column
| By Mike Argento, York Daily Record, Pa. | |
| McClatchy-Tribune Information Services |
It has to be out there somewhere, since it has become apparent that
If you look at it a certain way, that is the issue now before the nation's ultimate arbiters of justice, the Supremes.
And if you're not a legal scholar or constitutional nitpicker, it appears ridiculous on its face. The companies aren't being forced to hand out IUDs to the women who work for them. They are merely being required to offer insurance to employees that covers some basic health care.
Yet, the arguments were framed as an issue of religious liberty, that the companies do not have to comply with the law because they believe something contrary to the law.
As is it with most things that wind up before the Supremes, it's complicated and has something to do with peyote.
Yes, peyote.
The law at the center of the case is something called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in response to a
No, that wasn't it. They said the use of the drug was a religious rite, akin to a Catholic taking communion, albeit more likely to result in hearing colors and seeing your grandmother turn into a huge fire-breathing reptile surrounded by a flock of bats that swoop down on you and start eating your eyeballs while rivers of blood...
Where was I?
In 1990, the
The law, of course, applied only to people.
But now, as it is considered that corporations are people too,
Which is absurd. (
The people who own the corporations have every right to believe whatever they want to believe, even if they're wrong, which, in this case, they may well be. They erroneously equate the use of certain contraceptives with abortion, as if human life begins with the first glass of wine at dinner.
But that freedom should not allow them to force those beliefs on their employees, who come to work to make a living, not as an expression of their religious beliefs. The corporate entity called
Still, the court is considering it because, well, who knows why?
It could create a dangerous precedent and have all variety of unintended consequences.
There is little doubt that the owners of
But what is to stop other, less ethical corporate weasels from coming to Jesus, or whatever savior they desire, from claiming that paying a decent wage violates their religious principles? Could they claim their religious beliefs exempt them from discrimination laws? Could they claim any sort of religious belief that would be expedient to making huge piles of cash?
Some Christian sects don't believe in treating illness with medication. Would corporations have sudden conversions to get out of paying for health care altogether?
There are a couple of solutions to this for
Or they could just drop their health insurance and pay the tax required of businesses that opt out.
Or the owners of the businesses could decide that the Christian thing to do would to be tolerant of their employees who hold different beliefs and not try to foist their beliefs on them.
But that's as likely to happen as
___
(c)2014 York Daily Record (York, Pa.)
Visit York Daily Record (York, Pa.) at www.ydr.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
| Wordcount: | 1104 |


La Center man struggles after losing home
Advisor News
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
- Investors aren’t waiting out uncertainty
- Transamerica and Advo(k)ate Advisors launch pooled employer plan
- ‘I wish I’d met him sooner:’ Karlan Tucker remembered for integrity, faith
- Why women must be more engaged in investing
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Immediate Care Plan: A new solution for funding LTC
- Delaware Life Launches a New Bonus Fixed Index Annuity Built for Growth, Protection, and Flexibility
- LIMRA: Annuity sales set new quarterly record with $123.9B in Q2
- CANNEX names Gary Baker as its new CEO
- Corebridge adds options to its Power Series of indexed annuities
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Studies from University of Washington Reveal New Findings on Hepatitis C Virus (Comparative Evaluation of State-Level Subscription-Based Payment Models for Hepatitis C Drugs): Liver Diseases and Conditions – Hepatitis C Virus
- Colorado House Candidate Manny Rutinel Sponsored Legislation Forcing Health Insurers To Cover Sex Changes For Kids
- Oregon regulators plan to trim health insurance rate hikes, but premiums are still set to rise
- New dashboard tracks Kansas Affordable Care Act enrollment by legislative district, county
- How the loss of Haitian TPS will affect medical care in South Florida
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Vincent Esparza CFP, CLU joins Wilde Wealth Management Group as Senior Wealth Advisor
- NCOIL summer meeting sets attendance record
- Mercer Advisors Unveils Second Generation of Aspen, its AI-Enabled Platform for Fiduciary Family Offices
- Lincoln Financial Announces Reinsurance Transaction with Talcott
- Paperclip Partners with National Life Group to expand Secure Data Exchange and Carrier Network for Distribution
More Life Insurance News