Women are still paying for birth control. Why?
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires nearly every health insurance plan to cover contraception at no cost to the patient (with limited exceptions for grandfathered plans, shortterm plans and plans offered by private employers with religious objections).
Despite the fact that this requirement has been on the books for nearly 15 years, studies and surveys continue to show that large numbers of women are still paying for their birth control.
But why? A big part of the problem is that those paying out of pocket for contraceptive pills and devices are unaware of the requirement that these items be covered by insurance without a copayment. Since many patients do not understand the scope of the ACA's protections, it is harder to catch insurance violations.
Insurance violations are particularly acute when it comes to brand-name contraceptives, which many people do not know are included in the ACA's coverage requirement. As long as the patient and their doctor have decided that the brand-name contraceptive is "medically appropriate," it must be covered at no cost to the patient, the same as generic contraceptives.
In order to obtain this coverage, an insurance company may require a patient to apply for an exception, but federal law requires that the exceptions process must be "easily accessible, transparent, and sufficiently expedient" and may not be "unduly burdensome" on a patient or their doctor. Despite this, insurance companies sometimes create complicated processes or fail to fully explain the required processes, confusing patients who may believe that there is no way to get the medication covered. This is not acceptable.
I recently had a constituent write to me to tell me that she was being charged a co-payment for her brand-name birth control, seemingly in violation of the ACA. When I took the complaint to her insurance company, it turned out there was a "coding error" that impacted not just my constituent, but many women. This widespread issue had been going on for more than a year, and no one else had reported it. The insurance company reimbursed my constituent for her past payments and corrected the error going forward. But it made me think: What about the many women who do not catch and report these errors?
I recently wrote to the
If you or someone you know is being erroneously charged for contraceptives, you should reach out to your insurance company and advise others in the same situation to do the same. If the insurance company does not fix the issue, you can file a complaint with the entity that oversees insurance in your locality: the
With reproductive rights under attack across the country, it is more important than ever to protect access to contraceptives. Copayments and other charges can be prohibitive for many who need contraceptive care.
Barriers to birth control are not just bad for women, but for society in general. Birth control is linked to many benefits, including fewer unplanned pregnancies, more educational and economic opportunities for young women, and improved maternal and infant health. These benefits are exactly why we have a federal law protecting no-cost contraceptives. Insurance companies must follow the law and fully cover birth control with no out-of-pocket costs, and we must all hold them to account.
Contact state Sen.


Former Federal Reserve president speaks at St. Joseph Economic Development Summit
3 Top REITs With 5%-Plus Yields to Bet Big On As Fed Enters Rate-Easing Cycle
Advisor News
- After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
- Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
- Americans’ sense of overall prosperity still ticks upward
- Turning expanded eligibility into a better coverage plan for federal clients
- Election 2026: Which of Berkeley's 7 ballot measures will pass?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
- Jackson reports record annuity sales, increases share repurchase authorization
- Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
- Equitable, Corebridge steam toward merger with strong Q3 annuity sales
- Jackson Announces New Annuity Offering for AARP Members
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- MEDICAID PAYMENT TRANSPARENCY RULES: STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
- Medicare open enrollment continues through Dec. 7
- Pike County facing year-end employee healthcare lapse
- Investigators at University of Pennsylvania Report New Data on Managed Care (In-hospital Medicaid enrollment facilitates follow-up care for emergency general surgery patients): Managed Care
- New Findings from University of Pennsylvania in the Area of Managed Care Described (Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Excess Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries: Examining an Empirical Basis for Social Risk …): Managed Care
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and Its Subsidiary
- National Life Group Approves $23 Million Dividends for 2027
- Milliman’s proposed $15.5 million settlement puts life insurance underwriting data in focus
- Brighthouse Financial Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results
- Prudential earnings dip as Japan sales suspension offsets U.S. growth
More Life Insurance News