With auto insurance, you get what you pay for
Editor,
On
By
The changes in the law were allegedly driven by public outcry over the high cost of auto insurance in
Under the changed law, drivers gained the option to choose various levels of personal injury protection medical coverage, including optional limits.
Proponents of the changes claimed that the reforms aimed to lower auto insurance costs for
I was dead set against these changes.
First, insureds had to give up protections and coverage to lower their premiums. The options were confusing.
Secondly, most of us have seen little rate relief and, in fact, have experienced higher premiums since the changes.
Remember the
I am writing this letter to urge
Many people have chosen to reduce coverage and found out, after a serious accident, that they are not adequately covered.
Be careful how you purchase your personal injury protection coverage. Be mindful that limiting your insurance coverage can leave you unable to afford proper medical care, rehabilitation services and attended care.
With
Make sure that if you are insured by Medicare or Medicaid that you understand the limitations of those coverages. Many employers' self-insured health insurance plans cannot be coordinated with personal injury protection.
My advice? Take some time to speak to your insurance agent. Make sure that you understand what your current coverages are. If you have health insurance through your employer make sure you question how that coverage works with no-fault PIP.
More importantly, if you have purchased automobile insurance online, make sure that you are aware of what you have purchased. So many ads on social media claim huge reductions in premiums. It is likely that the lower premiums came with substantial reductions in coverage and protection.
Please do not end up in the hospital, a wheelchair, or a rehab facility, regretting that you did not understand what you were buying.



Raven MacFarlane-Bradbrook: We need Medicaid more than billionaires need tax cuts
Inflation slowed last month. That may not matter to the Fed
Advisor News
- Amid slew of corporate tax ideas, Newsom chose one likely to hit people’s premiums
- The biggest risk to your clients’ financial plans isn’t market volatility
- Initiative looks at how caregiving impacts workplace benefits
- Will rising retirement needs spark an annuity boom?
- Living longer, retiring poorer: Why fragmented systems are failing Americans
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Fortitude Re Completes $500 Million FABN Issuance
- Reframing retirement income for greater certainty
- Jackson Introduces Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Option, Flexible Premiums, Six-Year Rate Guarantee in Latest Registered Index-Linked Annuity Launch
- Senior Market Sales® Fortifies Annuity Reach With Acquisition of Retirement Planning Firm Stratton & Company
- NAIC regulators continue pushing for annuity illustration updates
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Amid slew of corporate tax ideas, Newsom chose one likely to hit people’s premiums
- The biggest risk to your clients’ financial plans isn’t market volatility
- Initiative looks at how caregiving impacts workplace benefits
- WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT RECENT FEDERAL ACTIONS INVOLVING STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM INTEGRITY
- WOMEN'S HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Greg Lindberg moves to halt $1.65B restitution order, claims he ‘overpaid’
- Fidelity Investments® to Expand Target Date Lineup With Launch of Guaranteed Income Solution
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: Much Ado About Nothing – Perspectives on Columbia Business School Paper About Private Ratings
- VUL sales skyrocket in Q1, signaling major market shift
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: A More Balanced Review of the NAIC PLR Review Process for Insurance Balance Sheets
More Life Insurance News