Why Cedar Rapids is footing $2 million bill to remove asbestos
Backhoes on Wednesday dug through rubble, sorting slabs of old foundation and other asbestos-contaminated debris in the center of the 30-acre site at the bend in the
"The building was demolished and put inside its basement and covered up with fill,"
The remnants are the last traces of 1871-founded
Under city ownership since 2007, the plant has been leveled to bare earth. Millions of dollars already have been spent on clean up. Yet asbestos remains, and the city is on the hook as it rehabilitates the old brownfield.
"Do we have any recourse on previous owners who didn't abate the asbestos properly?"
Zinser is the same contractor who cleared the Sinclair site after the 2008 flood and two fires in 2009.
The contract approved in May is part of a
The city had to act fast to make use of
Still, questions remain.
Why doesn't the previous owner bear responsibility if a building was improperly demolished? And why is the city paying the same contractor millions of dollars twice in seven years to clear asbestos from the same site?
While some answers exist, many records since have been destroyed, leaving a "murky" history of what exactly happened, as one official put it.
"It was improperly disposed of," Davis told the council. "It should have been taken to a landfill back then. Instead it was buried there on site. We are removing it to take it to the proper location, which is a landfill."
This week, Davis backed off the May statement, saying he doesn't know if anything improper occurred. He said remnants were buried over and mixed together, which has made cleanup that much more time consuming -- but he doesn't know exactly when it happened or who did it.
"I would not characterize it as anyone tried to hide it," he said. "Maybe fill dirt was put there so someone didn't fall into an open hole. I am not sure when happened."
Davis said the city is responsible for the cleanup because it bought the property in "as is, where is" condition, and this includes possible additional costs.
The Zinser contract includes a "healthy contingency for any underground contamination we might find," he said.
"The statement that
Sitting dormant after
Central States paid
Piersall estimated in 1995 Central States had spent
Future inspections found asbestos but no imminent health hazards, and the escrow was released. Central States only was obligated to clear the immediate hazard, Piersall clarified this week.
In the mid-2000s, public and private sector leaders wanted to redevelop what had deteriorated into an "eyesore" into a new Cedar Bend district. Former Mayor
About 20 businesses and 100 employees were using the site as Central States was demolishing several buildings.
They did it by the books, Piersall said. They secured a city demolition permit, notified the
Federal regulations require asbestos be removed and hauled away when a building is demolished. Once desired for its resistance to heat and fire, asbestos now is heavily regulated as a health hazard known to cause cancer and mesothelioma.
However, the roof of one building -- the remnants of which are being removed today -- was caving in, and it was too dangerous to remove asbestos before demolition, Piersall said. They planned to clear debris afterward, but at the same time the city began getting serious about purchasing the property, he said.
"We decided, Why, if we were going to sell it, why would we spend all of the money to clear it out, when the city was going to buy it 'as is'?" Piersall said, adding the city was aware of the remnants.
The city struck a deal in 2007 to purchase the property "as is" for
The next year, the 2008 flood rendered the site unsafe, and two fires destroyed much of what was left in 2009, triggering a federally sponsored fast-track, disaster-related demolition.
The previous owner "demolished part of the building and part of the plant with asbestos in it," said
Zinser inquired about removing the remnants of the demolished building, but was denied because it wasn't in the scope of the federal aid. Davis agreed it was not Zinser's responsibility in 2010.
Wuehr said the demolition would have been a violation if the building was not sampled for asbestos and the asbestos wasn't removed -- but he said he never had any evidence to prove a violation. The agency only keeps records for 10 years, he said, so it is impossible to verify the accounts of what happened through a paper trail
As to responsibility for cleanup that would be between the city and the previous owner, he said.
"The story has always been murky," he said.
l Comments: (319) 339-3177; [email protected]
Like what you're reading?
We make it easy to stay connected:
Follow @TwitterDev
Subscribe to our email newsletters
Download our free apps
Your next Government articles
After Trump's
___
(c)2017 The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
Visit The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa) at thegazette.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


The Latest: Ohio: Insurer found for lone county off exchange
White House Issues Statement on Hurricane Harvey
Advisor News
- Bill that could expand access to annuities headed to the House
- Private equity, crypto and the risks retirees can’t ignore
- Will Trump accounts lead to a financial boon? Experts differ on impact
- Helping clients up the impact of their charitable giving with a DAF
- 3 tax planning strategies under One Big Beautiful Bill
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- An Application for the Trademark “EMPOWER INVESTMENTS” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Bill that could expand access to annuities headed to the House
- LTC annuities and minimizing opportunity cost
- Venerable Announces Head of Flow Reinsurance
- 3 tax planning strategies under One Big Beautiful Bill
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- On the Move: Dec. 4, 2025
- Judge approves PHL Variable plan; could reduce benefits by up to $4.1B
- Seritage Growth Properties Makes $20 Million Loan Prepayment
- AM Best Revises Outlooks to Negative for Kansas City Life Insurance Company; Downgrades Credit Ratings of Grange Life Insurance Company; Revises Issuer Credit Rating Outlook to Negative for Old American Insurance Company
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Bao Minh Insurance Corporation
More Life Insurance News