Uthmeier sues medical groups over ‘gender-affirming care’
The complaint, filed last month in the
According to the complaint, the organizations allegedly developed and promoted a set of clinical guidelines that recommend a sequence of medical interventions, beginning with puberty suppression, progressing to cross-sex hormone treatment and culminating in irreversible surgeries, for children experiencing gender dysphoria.
The plaintiffs claim these interventions “irreversibly alter children’s bodies” and that there is no credible evidence demonstrating that such treatments alleviate pediatric gender dysphoria, asserting that earlier versions of guidelines were comparatively modest and that later revisions expanded recommendations to include lower age thresholds and broader indications.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants’ guidelines have been widely disseminated and repeatedly cited in medical practice and legal decisions, creating what the complaint describes as a “facade of legitimacy” that Uthmeier alleges conceals a lack of scientific support and hides the alleged risks associated with the interventions.
The plaintiffs allege these practices mislead consumers, medical professionals and state and federal entities about the purported safety and effectiveness of these treatments and thus violate the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and constitute a pattern of racketeering under the Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (Florida RICO Act).
The complaint notes that diagnoses of pediatric gender dysphoria have increased significantly in recent years, citing external sources and reports recognising a rise in numbers of children identifying as transgender and asserts that a holistic psychosocial model was historically endorsed by national health agencies, according to the suit.
The lawsuit claims that the defendants abandoned that model in favor of aggressive protocols that generate significant financial revenues for members and affiliates.
The civil action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, statutory penalties, civil penalties, attorney’s fees and costs and other equitable remedies under
The complaint alleges that the defendants’ actions have harmed Florida’s residents, including minors who may be subjected to the care protocols the lawsuit challenges and that without judicial intervention, such practices will continue, according to the suit.
In the press release announcing the lawsuit, the Attorney General’s Office said the complaint was filed against the three organizations for “allegedly misleading public opinion on the safety of ‘gender-affirming care’ for minors.”
The legal case


Best’s Special Report: Lower U.S. Property/Casualty Insurer Expenses Boost Segment’s Underwriting Results
Gemini and Crypto.com inject $21 million into pro-Trump super PAC ahead of 2026 midterms
Advisor News
- The first 5 years of your career could determine the next 50
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News