Updated Report From Center for Reproductive Rights, Ibis Reproductive Health: States With Most Abortion Restrictions Have Fewest Supportive Policies for Women, Children
States with the highest number of abortion restrictions tend to have the worst women and children's health outcomes and fewest supportive policies that would actually advance the health and well-being of families--according to an updated report released by the
The report--titled Evaluating Priorities: Measuring Women and Children's Health and Well-being against Abortion Restrictions in the States, Volume II--provides an update to the inaugural version of the report, originally published in 2014. As in 2014, the updated version challenges the claims of politicians who have passed abortion restrictions under the guise of protecting women's health and safety. Indeed, the report finds that many of the states that have the highest number of restrictions included in the research--including
The worst offenders--states that have passed ten or more of the restrictions included in analyses--account for a disproportionately large number of the nearly 400 abortion restrictions politicians have passed since 2010. And the trend continues; in the last three weeks the
Said
"This report makes clear that politicians in states with the most extreme record of attacking reproductive rights are also far less likely to support the kind of programs and policies that actually advance the health and well-being of families."
"As a result, women and children in
"What women, children and their families need their elected officials to focus on is increasing access to affordable healthcare, including Medicaid, so women can have prenatal care, cervical cancer screenings, and fewer preterm births. They should invest in healthy kids, who have good nutrition and physical education. This report clearly lays out that politicians pushing extreme anti-choice laws at the expense of public health have their priorities exactly backwards."
For years, politicians have claimed their motive in passing abortion restrictions was to protect women's health and safety. The
"In states where it is harder for women to make choices about their pregnancy and to have a safe abortion, we also see that there are fewer policies in place that could support women throughout their life course, including during pregnancy. When those policies are not in place, women's and children's health and wellbeing suffer the consequences", said
"These results matter because in states with relatively poor women's health, the addition of multiple abortion restrictions--which have been shown to negatively impact women and their families--places women at further disadvantage for good health."
The report examined state-level policies and broad health, social, and economic indicators and outcomes related to the well-being of women and children against state-level restrictions on abortion. To improve the nation's health, policymakers must prioritize implementation of policies shown to improve the well-being of women and children, and not on restricting access to needed health care services such as abortion.
The findings in the report include:
* The more abortion restrictions a state has on the books, the fewer evidence-based policies in place that promote the health and well-being of women and children.
- For example,
* States that have the most restrictions on abortion tend to have the worst health outcomes for women and children.
- For example,
Today's report comes as the politicians in the
Chairman Alexander and Ranking Member Murray Announce Health Care Committee Hearings
Following June Storms, Nebraska Congressional Delegation Makes Disaster Declaration Request
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News