STAR-CROSSED
In the most recent ratings issued
It represents the latest round of poor rankings under the Star system for this region's most important health care facilities.
By contrast, Ballad's
Nationwide, 248 hospitals both large and small received one-star ratings.
In the Internet age, people go online to check and leave ratings and reviews for practically everything — from restaurants, hotels and cruise lines to shopping preferences. Consumers often consider such ratings in making purchases and decisions.
"These are not hotels. These are really complicated organizations," said
Ballad was established in 2018 from former rivals
"What has changed since the merger is we have deliberately channeled our highest risk patients to JCMC, HVMC and BRMC, thus putting a disproportionate burden on those hospitals when it comes to Star ratings," Levine told the
The complications and mortality of sicker patients are then attributed to those hospitals, which Levine calls "one of the major flaws of the rating system."
The
"The overall star rating for hospitals summarizes quality information on important topics, like re-admissions and deaths after heart attacks or pneumonia," according to the CMS website." The overall rating, between 1 and 5 stars, summarizes a variety of measures across five areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. The five measure groups include mortality, safety of care, readmission, patient experience and timely and effective care.
"The overall rating shows how well each hospital performed on an identified set of quality measures compared to other hospitals in the
On the front of its ratings page, Medicare advises consumers on how to best utilize the information.
"Star ratings can give you information and help you compare hospitals locally and nationwide, but you should consider a variety of factors when choosing a hospital, like physician guidance about your care plan. Along with the overall rating, you should look at other aspects of hospital quality like rates of infection and complications, and patients' experience of care based on survey results."
Researching that data requires sifting through a series of packed spreadsheets, information about improvements and declines and an exhaustive series of web pages listing everything from patient survey results to complications and deaths.
Creating accountability
When it comes to evaluating health care facilities, Levine helped write the book. In 2004, as
"We were the first to create hospital transparency. I created it in
"My advice at the time was go condition by condition, service by service and identify what characteristics hospitals do that leads to better outcomes and measure a process of care measures," he said. "They veered, at some point in 2015 or 2016, and decided they wanted to have a simple system so they created the Star ratings.
"It came out in 2016 and was widely panned. CMS went back to the drawing board and
Levine argues the system — which measures only traditional Medicare patients — doesn't include socio-economic factors and health co-morbidities in its rankings.
"It would be easy to conclude I'm making excuses. I'm not. As long as the Star rating methodology is what it is now, and all these other variables are true about our region, it's not going to change dramatically.
A former Medicare executive, with knowledge of the rating system, spoke with the
The former official agreed with Levine's assessment "100%" that the ratings don't take into consideration social determinants, economic levels or general health of patients.
Efforts were made to improve the rating system's ability to accurately reflect hospital outcomes but the issue is "complicated," changes occur slowly and the process can become "political."
One change to the rating process, for example, could reflect poorly on some hospitals and cast others in a better light.
"Are these ratings fair? Are they accurate? Do they really represent what is going on? I think it's fair to say they don't or that there are some caveats to all of this," the former official said.
Patients from "lower socio-economic status" or who have more social determinant issues "definitely impacts their health so they're coming in as a sicker population," the former official said.
The Ballad argument
In 2021, Ballad's "big three" hospitals all saw their Star ratings improve from one star to two. In an email to his board of directors at that time, Levine declined to promote the change because of ongoing concerns with the rating system.
He said this region's challenges — including poverty, above average rates of cancer, diabetes, obesity and behavioral health — combine to skew the numbers when the sickest are combined in those three facilities.
"I have always had concerns about oversimplifying measurements of health care organizations because I've not yet seen a methodology that adequately accounts for poverty, social determinants and the variations in the populations hospitals serve," Levine wrote in the
As an example, he compared local results to some comparably sized
"The Star ratings are comparing two unlike populations," Levine said. "They're comparing
This region's population also varies widely in Medicare coverage. In
The Star ratings are limited only to Medicare fee-for-service populations and don't include lower acuity, healthier patients in Medicare Advantage plans.
"The population of patients in [Ballad] hospitals are sicker, higher acuity and more likely to experience infections and other issues," he said.
One case in point is diabetes. Rates are on the rise nationally with 11% of the
Diabetes in adults, especially if untreated, can create a whole range of complications including heart disease, chronic kidney disease, nerve damage, and other problems with feet, oral health, vision, hearing, and mental health, according to the
A review shows this region has higher rates of cancer, cardiovascular and diabetes-related deaths than the rest of
Suicide rates are higher here than the national median, as are the levels of opioid medication prescriptions, non-fatal overdoses and babies born with neo-natal abstinence syndrome.
Other sources
Both the
"For hospital quality performance, quality monitoring measures will include CMS Hospital Compare measures.
"Quality monitoring measures will be evaluated for the entire patient population and will not be restricted based on the patient's payor status. Specifically, these measures will not be limited to the Medicare population," according to the TDH document.
In 2021, the
"Star rating methodology has changed frequently and significantly since its inception comparing a current rating to a previous rating could be very misleading," according to the association.
In 2019, the
That report was also critical because the CMS ratings are based solely on data from patients with traditional Medicare.
Levine said Ballad hospitals have received high marks from other rating services, including
"They can't all be wrong," Levine said. "So to simplify all of this into a star rating when all of these things are true does a huge disservice to the hospitals and to the community. Because the worst thing that can happen, if someone has chest pains but says 'Bristol has a one-star rating, I'm not going there. I'm going to Sycamore Shoals or
[email protected] Twitter: @DMcGeeBHC
Floridians becoming insurance poor
Lost health insurance
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News