Sens. Van Hollen, Merkley, Smith, Colleagues Sound Alarm on Unlawful Charges for PrEP Patients
The Senators' letter follows a Wednesday court ruling that further threatens affordable access to PrEP. As the legal process moves forward, the Senators pressed the health insurance industry to abide by current law to provide medication and ancillary services without charge.
"It has been brought to our attention that enrollees in your members' health plans continue to be charged for necessary medications and ancillary services--including provider consultations and laboratory services--contrary to law and additional federal guidance issued by the Departments of Labor,
A 2019 ruling by the
Subsequent guidance, published by the
"In light of this clear guidance from CMS, we are alarmed by continual reports that patients are routinely billed, either for payment-in-full or for cost-sharing practices, related to medically-appropriate medications and essential services," they continued. "These costs can be daunting. HIV advocates and clinical workers across the county have reported that many patients are unaware that they do not have to pay out-of-pocket for PrEP and ancillary services, assuming that many of these costs are simply necessary for being on PrEP medication."
The Senators' letter highlights the inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV--including Black and Hispanic communities and transgender women--due to limited access to financial resources needed to cover costs of PrEP and associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.
In light of these concerns, the lawmakers ask the following questions and request a response from AHIP within 30 days:
1. What information or guidance is AHIP currently providing to support its members in ensuring that their health plans are compliant with federal regulations clarifying that PrEP and ancillary services should be available at no-cost to patients?
2. What information and educational materials is AHIP recommending that its members supply to enrollees to ensure that patients know that PrEP, including its ancillary services, should be provided at no-cost to enrollees?
3. How is AHIP working with laboratories and health care providers to ensure the accurate coding of appointments and services so that enrollees are not erroneously billed for these services?
4. How is AHIP working with its partners to develop a full understanding of the scope of the issue, both in terms of the number of individuals impacted and the monetary impacts of erroneous bills?
5. How is AHIP working with its members to resolve issues for beneficiaries who have been wrongfully charged for PrEP and associated services in an expeditious manner?
The letter is supported by PrEP4ALL, the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute, the
"Unfortunately we have documented dozens of cases of insurers still charging patients out-of-pocket fees for PrEP-related care, a year after CMS and the
"We appreciate Senators Merkley and Smith's leadership and all their colleagues desire to ensure that the preventative service provisions of the Affordable Care Act are properly implemented. Private insurers must provide PrEP drugs and associated services without patient cost-sharing. We are receiving too many complaints from PrEP users that this is not always happening. We trust with this letter insurers will ensure full compliance," said
"While appalling, it's sadly not shocking to see
* * *
To:
Dear Mr. Eyles
We write today regarding recent reports of patients across the country receiving bills and charges from AHIP members for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drugs that prevent HIV, along with necessary ancillary services, as part of the PrEP regimen./1 It has been brought to our attention that enrollees in your members' health plans continue to be charged for necessary medications and ancillary services--including provider consultations and laboratory services--contrary to law and additional federal guidance issued by the Departments of Labor,
As you know, a 2019 ruling by the
While this statutory requirement for payers remains the law of the land, the requirement has been further clarified in additional federal guidance, including in those issued by the
Indeed, CMS continued on to clarify that PrEP is not just the medication, but includes the full scope of essential medical services associated with the PrEP regimen, explicitly citing initial clinical assessments and ongoing monitoring of patients including HIV testing; hepatitis B and C testing; creatinine testing; sexually-transmitted infection (STI) testing and counseling, and other services essential to the efficacy of the PrEP regimen as outlined by the
In light of this clear guidance from CMS, we are alarmed by continual reports that patients are routinely billed, either for payment-in-full or for cost-sharing practices, related to medically-appropriate medications and essential services. These costs can be daunting. HIV advocates and clinical workers across the county have reported that many patients are unaware that they do not have to pay out-of-pocket for PrEP and ancillary services, assuming that many of these costs are simply necessary for being on PrEP medication. In some cases, these patients can pay over
The impact of these costs on patient access and public health more generally cannot be understated. Multiple academic studies have indicated that associated costs--including the costs of ancillary services--present a barrier to PrEP access in
While we recognize that partnerships with laboratories and health care providers, including accurate billing and coding, may present challenges, the statutory language of the PHSA section 2713 is clear in indicating that issuers, and issuers alone, are legally required to be compliant with providing coverage for PrEP, including the full scope of necessary related services, without cost-sharing. In light of these concerns, and the role we request responses to the following questions within 30 days of receipt of this letter:
1. What information or guidance is AHIP currently providing to support its members in ensuring that their health plans are compliant with federal regulations clarifying that PrEP and ancillary services should be available at no-cost to patients?
2. What information and educational materials is AHIP recommending that its members supply to enrollees to ensure that patients know that PrEP, including its ancillary services, should be provided at no-cost to enrollees?
3. How is AHIP working with laboratories and health care providers to ensure the accurate coding of appointments and services so that enrollees are not erroneously billed for these services?
4. How is AHIP working with its partners to develop a full understanding of the scope of the issue, both in terms of the number of individuals impacted and the monetary impacts of erroneous bills?
5. How is AHIP working with its members to resolve issues for beneficiaries who have been wrongfully charged for PrEP and associated services in an expeditious manner?
Thank you again for your attention to this pressing matter impacting public health in our country.
View co-signers and footnotes here: https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/news/press-releases/van-hollen-merkley-smith-colleagues-sound-alarm-on-unlawful-charges-for-prep-patients
* * *
Original text here: https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/news/press-releases/van-hollen-merkley-smith-colleagues-sound-alarm-on-unlawful-charges-for-prep-patients
Life and Non-Life Insurance Market to Witness Huge Growth by 2027: Axa, Cigna, MetLife
Sens. Merkley, Smith, Colleagues Sound Alarm on Unlawful Charges for PrEP Patients
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News