Sens. Cassidy, Collins, Capito, Isakson Introduce Comprehensive Obamacare Replacement Plan
Today, US Senators
"We have been stressing the importance of making sure we have a replacement plan ready to go with the repeal of Obamacare, in order to ensure that no one sees a gap in their health care coverage. With the introduction of the Patient Freedom Act of 2017, I believe we now have that plan," said
"Our current health care system is under considerable stress and will collapse if
"There needs to be a replacement for Obamacare that provides access to affordable, quality health care, including to those West Virginians currently receiving coverage through the exchange or
"The Patient Freedom Act encompasses the changes that Americans are demanding so they can once again have choices for more affordable health insurance," said Isakson. "This proposal allows young adults to remain on their parents' insurance through age 26, protects coverage for people with pre-existing conditions and prevents discrimination based on health status. Additionally, it returns authority back to the states to structure their insurance markets and serve their
To read the Patient Freedom Act of 2017 one pager, click here.
Background:
The Patient Freedom Act (PFA) of 2017 would take power from
Repeals: This proposal repeals burdensome federal mandates imposed by the Affordable Care Act, such as the individual mandate, the employer mandate, the actuarial value requirements that force plans to fit into one of four categories, the age band requirements that drive up costs for young people, and the benefit mandates that often force Americans to pay for coverage they don't need and can't afford.
Keeps: This proposal keeps essential consumer protections, including prohibitions on annual and lifetime limits, prohibition of pre-existing condition exclusions, and prohibitions on discrimination. It also preserves guaranteed issue and guaranteed renewability and allows young adults to stay on their parents' plan until age 26, as well as preserving coverage for mental health and substance use disorders.
State Option: The bill repeals Title I of the ACA (while retaining important consumer protections), and allows states to choose one of three options:
1. Reimplementation of the ACA: Option 1 allows the State to reinstate Title I of the ACA, including its mandates and other requirements. The State can continue to receive federal premium tax credits, cost-sharing subsidies, and
2. Choose a New State Alternative: Option 2 allows the State to enact a new market-based system that empowers patients while still ensuring those with pre-existing conditions are protected. The State could continue to receive funding equal to 95% of federal premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies, as well as the federal match for
3. Design an Alternative Solution without Federal Assistance: Option 3 would return power to the States to design and regulate insurance markets that work for their specific populations, without any federal assistance.
Option 2: A New State Alternative with Federal Assistance
Who is helped? This proposal provides financial assistance to legal residents of
What are the benefits? The basic health plan would provide all eligible individuals with a Roth Health Savings Account, a high deductible health plan, and a basic pharmacy plan. Americans could purchase more robust coverage if they chose, and without the ACA's restrictive mandates, the options available would not only likely be more affordable, but individuals could pick among plans to find one that best suits their specific needs. The Patient Freedom Act would also establish new protections for those who need emergency care, by placing limits on out-of-network surcharges for emergency medical services paid for with an HSA. The proposal also requires providers to publish "cash prices" for services paid for with an HSA or with cash.
How is it funded? Each State will receive the same level of funding it would have received under the ACA if 95% of those eligible for subsidies enrolled. In addition, the State will receive the money that would have been paid for a
30FurigayJof-5753553 30FurigayJof
House Committee Refuses to Allow Floor Vote on Del. Norton Amendment Exempting D.C. from National Anti-Choice Bill
North American Business Headlines at 6:20 a.m. EST
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News