SEC Issues Order Involving Benefytt Technologies and Gavin D. Southwell
* * *
In the Matter of
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement (the "Offers"), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over Respondents and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, and except as provided herein in Section V, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order ("Order"), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents' Offers, the Commission finds/1 that:
Summary
1. From
2. HII and Southwell falsely told investors that HII held its insurance distributors to its high compliance standards, which prohibited insurance agents from making misrepresentations to consumers. HII and Southwell falsely stated that HII had 99.99% consumer satisfaction and misleadingly stated that state departments of insurance received very few consumer complaints regarding HII. HII and Southwell understated the amount of business that had been generated by its most productive distributor,
3. In reality, throughout the time period, HII tracked tens of thousands of dissatisfied consumers complaining that third-party insurance agents that contracted with HII made misrepresentations to sell products, failed to cancel plans when consumers requested and charged consumers for products they did not authorize. Numerous consumers complained that these agents deceptively sold limited plans offered on HII's platform under the guise of comprehensive medical insurance, leaving some consumers with unpaid medical bills when they sought treatment.
4. When Southwell joined HII in 2016, he learned that
5. The
6. HII and Southwell violated the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), by making materially false and misleading statements that operated as a fraud upon investors. HII also violated, and Southwell caused HII's violations of, the reporting provisions of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-11 thereunder, by filing with the Commission annual and current reports containing materially false and misleading statements.
Respondents
7.
8.
Related Entities
9.
10. Distributor A, a
Facts
HII's Insurance-Related Business and Southwell's Role
11. HII is a technology platform, billing administrator and distributor of short-term and limited health insurance plans and other related products. HII sold products directly to consumers and also had contractual relationships with third-party distributors that sold products to consumers. HII handled the customer service and billing functions for products sold through third-party distributors, had direct contact with consumers who purchased products offered on HII's platform, and tracked and received consumer complaints concerning products sold either directly or through distributors.
12. HII's platform provided consumers with access to short term and limited duration insurance plans, as well as limited indemnity benefit plans, life insurance plans and medical discount plans. These products provided minimal health benefits, did not cover pre-existing conditions, hospital care or prescriptions, and were not considered qualifying health coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
13. Southwell was in charge of HII's business. As Southwell himself explained to a board member in
HII and Southwell Misrepresented to Investors that HII Held Distributors to Its High Compliance Standards
14. HII's compliance standards prohibited its representatives and third-party agents from making misrepresentations to consumers and charging consumers after they asked to cancel products, and required agents to comply with applicable laws, which similarly prohibited deceptive practices.
15. From 2017 to 2020, HII and Southwell falsely stated to investors that HII held its distributors to HII's high compliance standards and had terminated two non-compliant distributors. HII and Southwell also gave investors and a subscription news service the misleading impression that HII held distributors to its standards by providing detailed descriptions of how HII purportedly ensured distributor compliance, including: training agents; setting metrics; tracking complaints, cancellations and chargebacks (demands by dissatisfied consumers to their banks or credit card providers to return their money where the banks or credit card providers then charged HII for those amounts); conducting "secret shopping" calls (where an independent contractor anonymously contacts a distributor and poses as a typical consumer seeking to purchase insurance); and terminating non-compliant distributors.
16. HII and
* * *
Table
[Link to table at bottom of document.]
* * *
17. Contrary to the above statements, HII's compliance department documented extensive failures to comply with the company's compliance standards and applicable laws. For example, between 2017 and mid-2019, HII documented more than 24,000 consumer complaints alleging that insurance agents: (1) made misrepresentations to consumers in order to sell products; (2) failed to cancel plans when consumers requested; and (3) charged consumers for products whose purchase they had not authorized. HII also monitored certain calls from consumers asking distributors to cancel products. A large percentage of those calls did not comply with HII's standards and involved agent misrepresentations. In addition, HII had records of more than a dozen secret shopping calls to
18. In 2016, Southwell learned that
19. For example, in
20. Additionally, starting in late-2016, Southwell was informed that HII continued to do business with agents associated with Distributor A, which it had supposedly terminated that same year. Southwell was informed that these agents were compliant when brought back, but he also received contradictory information showing agents associated with Distributor A continued to deceitfully sell insurance products offered on HII's platform.
21. Notwithstanding the information Southwell received and had access to, he failed to assess whether HII's compliance efforts were effective before falsely telling investors that HII held distributors to its high compliance standards and terminated non-compliant distributors.
HII and Southwell Provided Investors False and Misleading Information about Consumer Satisfaction and Complaints
22. HII and Southwell falsely told investors that virtually all consumers were satisfied and misleadingly stated that consumers had lodged only a few complaints against HII with state departments of insurance.
23. HII and
* * *
Table
[Link to table at bottom of document.]
* * *
24. From 2017 to mid-2019, HII documented more than 24,000 dissatisfied consumers complaining about agent misrepresentations, unauthorized billing and failures to cancel plans. HII also documented approximately 28,000 chargebacks. HII recognized that many of these chargebacks may have been initiated by consumers who claimed the charges were not authorized. Thus, HII's and Southwell's above statements to investors concerned only a small fraction of the total number of consumer complaints and dissatisfied consumers that HII tracked. Moreover, investors were never told that HII itself, not the departments of insurance, designated certain complaints as "upheld" and HII made those designations without even contacting complaining consumers.
25. Before making the above statements, Southwell was on notice of a high number of complaints and chargebacks and a large number of dissatisfied consumers trying to cancel plans. For instance, in
HII and Southwell Understated the Amount of Sales Generated by
26. On a
27. Additionally, after the
HII's and Southwell's False and Misleading Statements Were Material to Investors
28. HII's and Southwell's false and misleading statements, which involved specific verifiable facts about its compliance and the amount of business generated by
29. In
30. HII's and Southwell's false and misleading statements related to an important component of HII's business. For example, in
31. Research analysts and the media included information they received from HII and Southwell about the company's compliance in their research reports and articles which were then distributed to investors.
32. The price of HII stock declined significantly after two negative news announcements. When the
Southwell's Sales of HII Stock
33. Southwell sold 80,000 shares of HII stock in
Violations
34. In light of the information that Southwell received and had access to, Southwell and HII knew or should have known the statements described above in reports filed with the
35. As a result of the conduct described above, HII and Southwell violated Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act, which prohibit, in the offer or sale of securities, materially false and misleading statements and practices that would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of securities. Negligence is sufficient to establish violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act. Aaron v.
36. As a result of the conduct described above, HII violated Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-11, which require every issuer of a security registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file with the Commission accurate annual and current reports, which include such further information as may be necessary to make the required statements not misleading. Scienter is not required for a violation of the reporting provisions. See
37. As a result of the conduct described above, Southwell caused HII's violations of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-11 by signing and authorizing the issuance of annual and current reports, when he knew or should have known they were materially false and misleading. Negligence is sufficient for causing a primary violation that does not require scienter.
Disgorgement
38. The disgorgement and prejudgment interest ordered in Section IV.D below is consistent with equitable principles, does not exceed Southwell's net profits from his violations, and will be distributed to harmed investors to the extent feasible. The Commission will hold funds paid pursuant to paragraph IV.D in an account at the United States Treasury pending distribution. Upon approval of the distribution final accounting by the Commission, any amounts remaining that are infeasible to return to investors, and any amounts returned to the Commission in the future that are infeasible to return to investors, may be transferred to the general fund of the
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents' Offers.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Section 21C of the Exchange Act, HII and Southwell cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-11 thereunder.
B. Respondent HII shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil penalty of
C. Respondent Southwell shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil money penalty in the amount of
D. Respondent Southwell shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement of
E. The foregoing payments must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondents may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondents may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
(3) Respondents may pay by certified check, bank cashier's check, or
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg.,
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying HII or Southwell as Respondents in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to
F. Pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a
V.
It is further Ordered that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sec.523, the findings in this Order are true and admitted by Respondent Southwell, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Respondent Southwell under this Order or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Respondent Southwell of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sec.523(a)(19).
By the Commission.
* * *
Footnotes:
1/ The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents' Offers of Settlement and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2022/33-11084.pdf
ACNB Corporation Announces Third Quarter Cash Dividend
SEC Charges Tampa-Based Health Insurance Distributor and Its Ex-CEO With Making False Statements to Investors
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News