Reps. Raskin, Castro Raise Concerns That Upcoming Report by State Department's 'Unalienable Rights' Commission Will Harm Global Human Rights
Rep.
"We are aware that the Commission's hearings recently ended, and that the Commission is reportedly preparing its final report," the Chairs wrote. "We are concerned that this report will undermine our nation's ability to lead on critical issues of universal human rights, including reproductive freedom and protections for millions of people globally in the LGBTQ community."
The Commission's focus on "natural law" has been interpreted by some advocacy groups and Department staff alike as an attempt by the
Reports (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/state-dept-panel-redefine-human-rights-based-natural/story?id=63400485) indicate that
In addition, it appears that the creation and operation of the Commission may have violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Last year, the Foreign Affairs Committee launched an investigation into the Commission, but has yet to receive an adequate response from the
The Subcommittees request a briefing by
* * *
To: The Honorable
Dear Ambassador Glendon and
We write to express our serious misgivings about the direction taken by the
We are concerned that this report will undermine our nation's ability to lead on critical issues of universal human rights, including reproductive freedom and protections for millions of people globally in the LGBTQ community. The Commission's purpose is ostensibly to "provide fresh thinking about human rights discourse where such discourse has departed from our nation's founding principles of natural law and natural rights." The Commission's focus on "natural law" has been interpreted by some advocacy groups and Department staff alike as an attempt by the
Commission members reportedly used hearings to "demonstrate skepticism toward human rights treaties and institutions" and "advance the idea that human rights are in need of prioritization or being placed into a hierarchy, conceivably with freedom of religion trumping other rights." This is in line with statements that Secretary Pompeo has made claiming that religious freedom is the "first liberty."/3 He has also said that politicians and bureaucrats have blurred the distinction between "unalienable" and "ad hoc" rights, asserting vaguely that "unalienable rights are by nature universal," but that not everything good can be a universal right./ 4
Theocratic states have been trampling the rights of religious minorities, dissenters and secularists, and we should be on the front lines of denouncing religious tyranny as our Enlightenment Forebears were. But counterposing religious freedom against other essential freedoms is an assault on the American Bill of Rights and our history of constitutional jurisprudence upholding the inviolable freedoms of the person against the state. This anomalous new trajectory you have embarked upon threatens to undermine the responsibility of the
In addition, it appears that the creation and operation of the Commission may have violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires committees to be "fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented."/6
Several human rights organizations have filed a lawsuit against the Commission alleging that none of the Commission's Members support LGBTQ and reproductive rights as articulated by the
This letter, in part, follows on the work of the
In light of these serious concerns, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations within the
1. All documents referring or relating to concerns or inquiries that provided the rationale for creating this Commission and why "fresh thinking" on human rights was necessary;
2. The criteria that were used to determine who was appointed to this Commission;
3. The Commission's definition of "unalienable" rights and which rights the Commission considers "unalienable;"
4. The Commission's definition of "ad hoc" rights and which rights the Commission considers "ad hoc;"
5. The Commission's definition of "natural law" and the derivation of this definition;
6. The number of meetings the Commission and its subcommittees have had, as well as:
a. The invitees and attendees of those meetings other than the members of the Commission;
b. The subject matter of those meetings;
c. Any minutes and/or notes from those meetings;
7. Copies of all remarks made by speakers at Commission meetings;
8. All briefing materials provided by the
9. All internal and external communications relating to the Commission; and
10. All documents related to the purpose, development, and implementation of the Commission.
An attachment to this letter provides additional instructions for responding to the Committee's request. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Committee staff at (202) 225-5051.
See signatories and footnotes here: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2020-06-09.JR%20JC-HFAC%20to%20State%20re%20Unalienable%20Rights%20Commission.pdf


Best’s Market Segment Report: COVID-19 Pandemic May Accelerate Much-Needed Changes in Struggling D&O Market
AM Best Removes From Under Review With Negative Implications and Affirms Credit Ratings of California Insurance Company and Its Affiliates
Advisor News
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Reports Outline OBGYN and Reproduction Study Findings from Health Care Cost Institute (Hospital Bypass Among Rural Obstetric Patients With Commercial Health Insurance): OBGYN and Reproduction
- Madison Faces Higher Library and Health Insurance Costs as Officials Look Ahead to 2027 Budget
- The percentage of people without health insurance is growing
- MORE THAN 4 MILLION MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WILL HAVE THEIR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE OR STAND-ALONE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN TERMINATED AT THE END OF 2026
- Plans with cheaper premiums are risky business for Americans seeking lower healthcare costs
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News