Reconciliation bill would cut $800B in health care spending, spike uncompensated care
The budget reconciliation bill passed by the House of Representatives would reduce health care spending in the United States by $797 billion over the next decade, with more than one-third (36%) of the cuts occurring in California, Florida, Texas and New York, a new analysis shows. Drops in medical spending would run more than $20 billion in nine additional states (Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington).
Prepared by the Urban Institute with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the analysis finds that hospitals would face an overall cut of $321 billion in spending from reconciliation, while physicians would face an $81 billion cut. Spending on prescription drugs would decline by $191 billion from 2025 to 2034.
At the same time, the analysis shows U.S. hospitals would face a $63 billion increase in uncompensated care over the next decade—services sought by the uninsured that hospitals and other providers are required to deliver but are not reimbursed.
Some experts say costs of uncompensated care are ultimately passed on to insured patients through higher healthcare prices.
“The Medicaid cuts Congress is considering would be the largest funding reduction in the program’s history, and it is hard to overstate just how devastating the impacts would be,” said Katherine Hempstead, senior policy adviser at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “Such drastic changes to Medicaid financing would have ripple effects that go well beyond people covered by the program, further squeezing hospitals, limiting access to care for entire communities, and destabilizing state and local economies.”
“As Congress considers significant cuts to the Medicaid program and ACA Marketplaces, this analysis can help state and local policymakers and stakeholders consider the potential adverse effects on healthcare coverage, access, and affordability, and the financial vulnerability of certain providers in their state,” said Fredric Blavin, senior fellow at the Urban Institute.
Decline in health care spending due to reconciliation bill, 2025-2034 (billions of dollars):
| STATE | OVERALL | HOSPITALS | PHYSICIANS | OTHER | PRESCRIPTIONS |
| Alabama* | 5.5 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| Alaska | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Arizona | 28.2 | 11.2 | 2.8 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Arkansas | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| California | 100.0 | 40.1 | 8.5 | 25.8 | 25.6 |
| Colorado | 10.4 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| Connecticut | 8.5 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| Delaware | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| District of Columbia | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Florida* | 55.8 | 23.3 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 11 |
| Georgia* | 26.1 | 11.2 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 4.9 |
| Hawaii | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Idaho | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Illinois | 22.2 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 5.7 | 5.2 |
| Indiana | 30.9 | 12.7 | 3.1 | 7.6 | 7.4 |
| Iowa | 5.0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Kansas* | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Kentucky | 8.9 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| Louisiana | 15.6 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| Maine | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Maryland | 15.4 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Massachusetts | 6.0 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| Michigan | 16.2 | 6.4 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| Minnesota | 12.4 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Mississippi* | 7.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Missouri | 13.3 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Montana | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Nebraska | 5.9 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Nevada | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| New Hampshire | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| New Jersey | 19.2 | 6.9 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| New Mexico | 9.2 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| New York | 61.6 | 26.8 | 5.9 | 15.8 | 13.2 |
| North Carolina | 35.9 | 12.5 | 2.6 | 9.9 | 10.9 |
| North Dakota | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Ohio | 23.6 | 9.5 | 2.2 | 6.1 | 5.8 |
| Oklahoma | 13.6 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| Oregon | 22.6 | 8.8 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Pennsylvania | 32.0 | 12.6 | 3.1 | 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Rhode Island | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| South Carolina* | 9.6 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| South Dakota | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Tennessee* | 8.5 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Texas* | 67.5 | 28.4 | 9.4 | 16.3 | 13.5 |
| Utah | 6.9 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| Vermont | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Virginia | 18.5 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Washington | 22.3 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| West Virginia | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Wisconsin | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Wyoming* | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Total | 797 | 321 | 81 | 205 | 191 |
Source: (1) Congressional Budget Office projections for the overall increase in the number of uninsured and (2) Urban Institute Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model for the state-level distribution of uninsurance changes and per newly uninsured spending estimates.
Notes: *Indicates nonexpansion state. Researchers treat Wisconsin as an expansion state because the state provides minimum essential coverage through an 1115 demonstration and would be subject to key provisions of the reconciliation bill.
Increase in uncompensated care sought by the uninsured due to reconciliation bill, 2025-2034 (billions of dollars):
| STATE | OVERALL | HOSPITALS | PHYSICIANS | OTHERS | PRESCRIPTIONS |
| Alabama* | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| Alaska | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Arizona | 6.5 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Arkansas | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| California | 27.5 | 8.4 | 3.3 | 10.2 | 5.5 |
| Colorado | 4.7 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| Connecticut | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Delaware | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| District of Columbia | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Florida* | 11.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 2.3 |
| Georgia* | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Hawaii | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Idaho | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Illinois | 6.2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Indiana | 7.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| Iowa | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Kansas* | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Kentucky | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Louisiana | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| Maine | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Maryland | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Massachusetts | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| Michigan | 7.0 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| Minnesota | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| Mississippi* | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| Montana | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Nevada | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| New Hampshire | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| New Jersey | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| New Mexico | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| New York | 13.1 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 2.8 |
| North Carolina | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| North Dakota | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Ohio | 6.4 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| Oklahoma | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| Oregon | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Pennsylvania | 6.5 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| Rhode Island | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| South Carolina* | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| South Dakota | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Tennessee* | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 |
| Texas* | 15.9 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 3.1 |
| Utah | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Vermont | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Virginia | 6.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Washington | 6.3 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| West Virginia | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Wisconsin | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Wyoming* | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 204 | 63 | 24 | 76 | 41 |
Source: (1) Congressional Budget Office projections for the overall increase in the number of uninsured and (2) Urban Institute Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model for the state-level distribution of uninsurance changes and per newly uninsured spending estimates.
Notes: *Indicates nonexpansion state. Researchers treat Wisconsin as an expansion state because the state provides minimum essential coverage through an 1115 demonstration and would be subject to key provisions of the reconciliation bill.
Read the full analysis “State-Level Estimates of Health Care Spending and Uncompensated Care Changes under the Reconciliation Bill and Expiration of Enhanced Subsidies.”


Cleveland Fed: Tariffs are raising some prices in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky
Federal Medicaid cuts would cost 13,000 Kansans their health care coverage
Advisor News
- Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
- How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Jackson CEO Laura Prieskorn to retire at the end of 2026
- Has your annuity been reinsured in the Cayman Islands? Here’s why it matters
- DOL slams pension risk transfer lawsuit as ‘opportunistic’ litigation
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- New dashboard tracks Kansas Affordable Care Act enrollment by legislative district, county
- ICYMI – CANDIDATE COOPER NOW TRYING TO BLAME HIS HEALTH INSURANCE PALS FOR GOVERNOR COOPER'S 57% INCREASE IN HEALTHCARE COSTS IN NC
- Business People: Edric Funk to take over as Toro Co. CEO
- Insurers propose premium increases for ACA customers in Iowa
- How Does New CareScout Long-Term Care Insurance Policy Compare In Cost
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Maintains Stable Outlook on Vietnam’s Non-Life Insurance Segment
- AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Horace Mann Educators Corporation and Its Subsidiaries Following Announced Transaction with Medical Mutual of Ohio
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Hanwha General Insurance Company Limited
- Globe Life boosts Q2 earnings, eyes AI shift for long-term growth
- ATTORNEY GENERAL BRENNA BIRD LEADS FIGHT TO PROTECT IOWA PENSIONS
More Life Insurance News