Proposed Short-Term Health Plan Rule Would Weaken Patient Protections and Split Insurance Market - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
April 21, 2018 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Proposed Short-Term Health Plan Rule Would Weaken Patient Protections and Split Insurance Market

Targeted News Service (Press Releases)

WASHINGTON, April 20 -- The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network issued the following news release:

Today the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) submitted comments to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on proposed changes to rules governing short-term, limited duration insurance plans (STLD). The comments detail how the proposed rule could divide the individual insurance market and significantly weaken patient protections, leaving cancer patients and survivors with few meaningful or affordable coverage choices.

As proposed, short-term plans would be able to deny or charge people more for coverage based on their health status, would be exempt from covering essential health services, like prescription drugs or hospitalization, and could charge older people more than three times what they charge a younger person for the same coverage. These tactics aimed at cutting health plan costs were common practices before 2014 and often made it impossible for cancer patients and survivors to get insurance on the individual market.

Currently short-term plans are only available for up to 3 months, and are intended to fill brief gaps in coverage. The proposed rule would extend the availability of these plans up to 364 days and provide an option for indefinite renewal - allowing them to function like permanent health insurance without actually having to follow most of the rules.

As noted in the comment letter, these changes would likely split the insurance market between young and healthy people who are able to purchase short-term, lower-premium plans and older and sicker people, like cancer patients, who need comprehensive coverage. The end result would be increasing premiums for people who need meaningful coverage and higher risk for those who purchase inadequate short-term plans.

Moreover, because such plans could charge older people more than the current 3 to 1 limit, "older individuals would face significantly higher health care premiums or be priced out of the market entirely." This is especially concerning considering the incidence of cancer increases with age.

Other concerns, include that short-term policies have a history of fraud and that litigation is ongoing against some STLD issuers who are accused of sales tactics that targeted vulnerable consumers.

Access to comprehensive, affordable health insurance is essential to reducing cancer incidence and death in the United States. American Cancer Society research has shown those who lack appropriate insurance coverage are less likely to get screened for cancer and more likely to have their cancer diagnosed at a later stage when treatment costs are higher and survival is less likely.

ACS CAN urges the Department to withdraw the flawed short-term rule until patient concerns can be addressed.

The full comment letter is available at:https://bit.ly/2Hj4WOQ

Older

Federal Regulators Fine Wells Fargo $1 Billion for Auto Lending and Mortgage Abuses

Newer

Henkel Has Opened a New Somat Factory in Serbia

Advisor News

  • Wealth planning vs. estate planning: Honoring your client’s wishes
  • What to discuss during the first retirement planning meeting
  • Inflation, competing priorities and uncertainty erode retirement security
  • As health premiums rise, 1 in 8 workers cut retirement savings
  • CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
  • AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
  • USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
  • How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
  • Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Pennsylvania Health Plans Must Cover Colon Cancer Screening at 45
  • In Miami-Dade court, health insurer fights an order to cover $48,500 cancer drug
  • Fed judge blocks Medicaid work requirement rule
  • Health insurers leave millions unpaid for mental health crisis care in California
  • Commissioner places Mending Health in conservatorship
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Insignia Life S.A. de C.V.
  • FINANCIAL FRAUD
  • Security Benefit Announces Planned Dividend Rate Reset for Series B Preferred Stock
  • Palmetto Heritage and Atlantic Coast Life Announce Discussions Regarding Potential Acquisition
  • Jury finds insurance company acted in bad faith, awards Nebraska woman $11.3M
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Spectrum Weather & Specialty Insurance Celebrates 15 Years and Welcomes the Next Generation
  • Royal Neighbors of America® Increases Service Capacity
  • Benefits Studio Launches to Fill the Missing Middle of Benefits Navigation at $49/mo
  • Lauren Sinnott Named to Ragan’s Top Women in Marketing Awards, Class of 2026 
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.