Proposed changes on Medicare drugs create winners and losers
Medicare's administrator,
The proposals apply to two popular parts of Medicare: private Medicare Advantage plans that offer comprehensive health care coverage, and prescription drug plans also offered by private insurers.
Changes would not take place until 2020 at the earliest.
"For beneficiaries there are trade-offs," said
Verma said the changes, if finalized, would ultimately save money for beneficiaries by sharpening competition among the insurers who deliver Medicare Advantage and prescription coverage. "At the end of the day, the patient remains in the driver's seat," she said. "They decide which plan to pick."
Among the changes:
— More leeway for insurers to exclude a specific drug in Medicare's six "protected classes" of medications. Those classes include antidepressants, drugs to treat psychosis, anti-seizure medications, cancer drugs, medications to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, and HIV-AIDS drugs. Proposed changes could run into strong opposition from patient advocacy groups, which derailed a similar effort by the Obama administration. The power to exclude a drug gives insurers more leverage to obtain lower prices from drugmakers.
— Updated e-prescribing requirements that would allow doctors and patients to get an accurate estimate of out-of-pocket costs when a prescription is written. "This capability has not been implemented at the doctor's fingertips because there has been insufficient demand for it," said
— Giving Medicare Advantage insurers the ability to require "step therapy" for drugs administered in a doctor's office, which means patients first have to try a lower-cost medication. Doctor-administered drugs are a sensitive issue because many are cancer medications. Verma said safeguards in the proposed rule would protect patients, but it's another idea that will get close scrutiny from advocacy groups.
—Changing Medicare rules so a portion of rebates from drugmakers get passed on to patients when they pick up their medications at the pharmacy. This idea has been previously floated by the administration on a bigger scale, and Verma suggested it remains a work in progress. According to a cost analysis by the administration, the latest proposal would save money for some beneficiaries as well as for pharmaceutical companies but increase costs for taxpayers. Beneficiary premiums for drug coverage would be slightly higher.


Former mayor, former lawmaker Bill Hurley has died
Advisor News
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Madison Faces Higher Library and Health Insurance Costs as Officials Look Ahead to 2027 Budget
- The percentage of people without health insurance is growing
- MORE THAN 4 MILLION MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WILL HAVE THEIR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE OR STAND-ALONE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN TERMINATED AT THE END OF 2026
- Plans with cheaper premiums are risky business for Americans seeking lower healthcare costs
- Plans with cheaper premiums are risky business for Americans seeking lower healthcare costs
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News