Pramila Jayapal to introduce Medicare for All bill that would overhaul nation’s health-care system
The proposal, which has 107 co-sponsors, is even more ambitious in scope -- covering more services, more quickly -- than the Medicare For All bill previously proposed by
Jayapal, the co-chair of the
In January, Jayapal garnered better committee assignments for her caucus in exchange for supporting Rep.
"
Jayapal's new legislation, to be unveiled Wednesday, would expand not just who's covered by Medicare but also the services Medicare covers. It would pay for primary care but also prescription drugs, dental and eye care, long-term care, reproductive health care and mental-health and substance-abuse treatment.
Patients would not be charged premiums, copays or deductibles.
The bill does not say how the massive increase in government health-care spending would be funded.
A study of Sanders' proposal found it would increase government health spending by more than
Jayapal said that she had broad funding sources in mind -- higher taxes on the wealthy, premiums paid by employers, a higher corporate-tax rate, the repeal of the recent Republican tax cuts -- but that those could come later.
"The question is not about how we pay for it," Jayapal said. "The question is where is the will to ensure that every American has the health care they deserve."
The bill would move everyone to a single-payer system within two years of passage.
In a conference call with reporters Tuesday, Jayapal ticked off earnings and salaries of insurance companies and their executives.
"The only people who cannot afford the cost of a Medicare for All program of universal health care are these companies and CEOs that stand to lose their massive profits," Jayapal said. "Why is it that other major countries can guarantee universal health care for half the cost of Americans?"
Last year, some of the nation's biggest health insurers, hospital coalitions and pharmaceutical organizations formed a new group to counter the push for single-payer health care -- the
"This costly, disruptive one-size-fits-all proposal is the wrong path forward,"
Under the bill, hospitals and other health-care facilities would receive quarterly lump-sum payments from the government, based on their historical service levels and other factors, to provide covered health-care services rather than being paid for each service they provide.
"Physicians will have to figure out how they keep a population healthy within those budgetary constraints," Jayapal said.
Private health insurance that duplicates the services covered under the government-run program would be prohibited, but insurers and employers could continue to offer supplemental coverage. Medicare could negotiate with pharmaceutical companies -- something it's now prohibited from doing -- to lower the cost of prescription drugs.
With 107 co-sponsors, Jayapal's bill has slightly less than half of
But, unlike the
"This is a real plan, it's been developed over months, it has an unprecedented coalition of support," Jayapal said. "We will be pushing it as far as we can, as hard as we can, as fast as we can."
The bill still has little chance of passage in the House and no chance of passage in the Republican-controlled
"In thinking about 2020, in thinking about both the
___
(c)2019 The Seattle Times
Visit The Seattle Times at www.seattletimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Best’s Special Report: Wide-Ranging Stakeholders Demand Greater Insurer and Reinsurer Focus on ESG Principles
California Dems Won’t Push Government-Run Health Care This Year
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News