Pillar 3 Disclosures at 31 December 2023
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Contents
- Introduction
- Pillar 3 Disclosures and Governance
- Highlights
5 Key metrics
6 Regulatory developments and Key changes
8 Linkage to the Annual Report and Accounts 2023
12 Risk management
14Treasury risk management
15 Own funds
17 Leverage ratio
19 Capital buffers
19 Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements and RWA flow
23 Liquidity
29 Asset encumbrance
30 Pillar 2 and ICAAP
31 Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities
38 Credit risk
81 Counterparty credit risk
86 Securitisation
92 Market risk
97 Non-financial risk
98 Other risks
99 Countercyclical capital buffer
101 Board Diversity
Appendices
102 Appendix I - Summary of disclosures withheld
- Appendix II - Mapping- Internal ratings to external ratings
- Compliance with CRR II Pillar 3 requirements
- Other information
- Abbreviations
- Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements
- Contacts
Unless the context requires otherwise, '
This document should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report and Accounts 2023, which has been published on our website at
www.hsbc.com/investors.
HSBC Holdings plc Pillar 3 2023
Tables
- 1 Key metrics (KM1/IFRS9-FL)
- 2 Reconciliation of regulatory own funds to balance sheet in the audited financial statements (
UK CC2)
- 3 Principal entities with a different regulatory and accounting scope of consolidation (LI3)
- 4 Differences between accounting and regulatory scopes of consolidation and mapping of financial statement categories with regulatory risk categories (LI1)
- 5 Main sources of differences between regulatory exposure amounts and carrying values in financial statements (LI2)
15 6 Composition of Regulatory own funds (
- 7 Leverage ratio common disclosure (
UK LR2-LRCom) - 8 Summary reconciliation of accounting assets and leverage ratio exposures (
UK LR1- LRSum)
18 9 Leverage ratio - split of on-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives, SFTs and exempted exposures) (
- 10 Overview of risk-weighted exposure amounts (OV1)
- 11 RWA flow statements of credit risk exposures under the IRB approach (CR8)
21 12 RWA flow statements of CCR exposures under IMM (CCR7)
21 13 RWA flow statements of market risk exposures under IMA (MR2-B)
- 14 Quantitative information on IRRBB (
UK IRRBB1) - 15 Level and components of
HSBC Group consolidated liquidity coverage ratio (LIQ1) - 16 Net stable funding ratio (LIQ2)
27 17 Analysis of on-balance sheet encumbered and unencumbered assets
29 18 Encumbered and unencumbered assets (
- 19 Collateral received and own debt securities issued (
UK AE2) - 20 Sources of encumbrance (
UK AE3)
- 21.i Key metrics of the European resolution group (KM2)
- 21.ii Key metrics of the Asian resolution group
- 21.iii Key metrics of the US resolution group
- 22 TLAC composition (TLAC1)
- 23
HSBC Holdings plc creditor ranking (TLAC3)
- 24
HSBC UK Bank plc creditor ranking (TLAC2) - 25
HSBC Bank plc creditor ranking (TLAC2)
- 26
HSBC Asia Holdings Ltd creditor ranking (TLAC3) - 27 The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd creditor ranking (TLAC2)
37 28
37 29
- 30 Performing and non-performing exposures and related provisions (CR1)
- 31 Maturity of exposure (CR1-A)
- 32 Changes in the stock of non-performing loans and advances (CR2)
- 33 Credit quality of forborne exposures (CQ1)
- 34 Credit quality of performing and non-performing exposures by past due days (CQ3)
- 35 Collateral obtained by taking possession and execution processes (CQ7)
- 36 Quality of non-performing exposures by geography (CQ4)
- 37 Credit quality of loans and advances to non-financial corporations by industry (CQ5)
- 38 Credit risk mitigation techniques - overview (CR3)
- 38.i Analysis of accounting lines comprising total exposures in CR3
- 39 Standardised approach - credit conversion factor ('CCF') and credit risk mitigation ('CRM') effects (CR4)
- 40 IRB - Effect on the RWA of credit derivatives used as CRM techniques (CR7)
48 41 IRB approach - Disclosure of the extent of the use of CRM techniques (CR7-A)
- 42 Scope of the use of IRB and SA approaches (
UK CR6-A) - 43 CQS reference table
- 44 Standardised approach - exposures by asset classes and risk weights (CR5)
- 45 Wholesale IRB credit risk models
- 46 Wholesale IRB models - estimated and actual values
- 47 Wholesale IRB exposure - back-testing of probability of default (PD) per portfolio (CR9)
62 48 Retail IRB risk rating systems
65 49 Retail IRB models - estimated and actual values
65 50 Retail IRB exposure - back-testing of probability of default (PD) per portfolio (CR9)
- 51 Specialised lending and equity exposures under the simple risk-weight approach (CR10)
- 51.i Equity exposures under simple risk-weighted approach
- 52 IRB - Credit risk exposures by portfolio and PD range (CR6)
- 53 Analysis of counterparty credit risk exposure by approach (excluding centrally cleared exposures (CCR1)
- 54 Credit valuation adjustment capital charge (CCR2)
- 55 Standardised approach - CCR exposures by regulatory exposure class and risk weights (CCR3)
- 56 Composition of collateral for CCR exposure (CCR5)
- 57 Credit derivatives exposures (CCR6)
- 58 Exposures to central counterparties (CCR8)
- 59 IRB - CCR exposures by portfolio and PD scale (CCR4)
- 60 Securitisation exposures in the non-trading book (SEC1)
- 61 Securitisation exposures in the trading book (SEC2)
- 62 Securitisation exposures in the non-trading book and associated regulatory capital requirements - bank acting as originator or as sponsor (SEC3)
- 63.i Securitisation exposures in the non-trading book and associated capital requirements - bank acting as investor (SEC4)
- 63.ii Securitisation exposures in the trading book and associated capital requirements - bank acting as investor (SEC4)
- 64 Exposures securitised by the institution - Institution acts as originator or as sponsor (SEC5)
- 65 Market risk under standardised approach (MR1)
92 66 Market risk under IMA (MR2-A)
- 67 Comparison of VaR estimates with gains/losses (MR4)
- 68 IMA values for trading portfolios (MR3)
- 69 Prudential valuation adjustments (PV1)
- 70 Operational risk own funds requirements and risk- weighted exposure amounts (OR1)
- 71 Geographical distribution of credit exposures relevant for the calculation of the countercyclical buffer (
UK CCyB1) - 72 Amount of institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer (
UK CCyB2)
|
|
2 |
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Introduction
Pillar 3 Disclosures and Governance
Regulatory framework for disclosure
Our Pillar 3 Disclosures at
We are supervised on a consolidated basis in the
At the consolidated Group level, capital is calculated for prudential regulatory purposes using the Basel III framework as implemented in the
The regulators of the Group's banking entities outside the
While the frameworks may vary for some of our banking subsidiaries they do not impact Group's disclosures. However, the changes to local regulatory frameworks may impact distributions from our subsidiaries.
Information relating to the rationale for withholding certain disclosures is provided in Appendix I.
We publish our Pillar 3 disclosures quarterly on our website www.hsbc.com/investors.
Regulatory reporting processes and controls
The quality of regulatory reporting remains a key priority for management and regulators. We are progressing with a comprehensive programme to strengthen our global processes, improve consistency and enhance controls across regulatory reports.
The ongoing programme of work focuses on our material regulatory reports and is being phased over a number of years. This programme includes data enhancement, transformation of the reporting systems and an uplift to the control environment over the report production process.
While this programme continues, there may be further impacts on some of our regulatory ratios, such as the common equity tier ('CET1'), liquidity coverage ratio ('LCR') and net stable funding ratio ('NSFR'), as we implement recommended changes and continue to enhance our controls across the process.
Comparatives and references
To give insight into movements during 2023, we provide comparative figures, commentary on variances and flow tables for capital requirements. In all tables where the term 'capital requirements' is used, this represents the minimum total capital charge set at 8% of Risk-weighted asset ('RWA') by Article 92(1) of CRR II. Narratives are included to explain quantitative disclosures where necessary.
The regulatory numbers and ratios presented in this document were accurate as at the date of reporting. Small changes may exist between these numbers and ratios and those submitted in regulatory filings. Where differences are significant, we will restate comparatives.
Where disclosures have been enhanced, or are new, we do not generally restate or provide comparatives. Wherever specific rows and columns in the tables prescribed are not applicable or are immaterial to our activities, we omit them and follow the same approach for comparatives.
Pillar 3 requirements may be met by inclusion in other disclosure media. Where we adopt this approach, references are provided to the relevant pages of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023 of
The table below references where comparatives have been restated.
|
Page ref |
Table Reference |
Activity |
|
|
15 |
Table 6 |
- |
|
|
17 |
Table 7 |
- |
|
|
18 |
Table 8 |
- |
|
|
18 |
Table 9 |
- |
Adoption of IFRS17 |
|
27 |
Table 17 - Analysis of |
||
|
encumbered and unencumbered |
|||
|
32 |
Table 21.i - KM2 |
||
|
34 |
Table 22 - TLAC1 |
||
|
44 |
Table 37 |
- CQ5 |
Revised basis of preparation |
|
48 |
Table 40 |
- CR7 |
|
|
48 |
Table 41 |
- CR7-A |
Disclosure requirements |
|
54 |
Table 44 |
- CR5 |
Governance
The Board continued to oversee the governance, operation and oversight of the Group and its principal and material subsidiaries.
The
This Pillar 3 disclosure report was approved by the HSBC Board on
Georges Elhedery
Group Chief Financial Officer
HSBC Holdings plc Pillar 3 2023
Highlights
Our CET1 capital was
up 0.6 percentage points compared with
The ratio is higher than our target range of 14% to 14.5% and we intend to continue to manage the CET1 ratio to within this range. The total dividend per share in 2023 of
The Board has approved a fourth interim dividend of
CET1 capital and ratio
|
125.7 |
126.4 |
124.8 |
126.5 |
|
119.3 |
|||
|
14.7% |
14.7% |
14.9% |
14.8% |
|
14.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CET1 ratio movement
|
1.0 |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
14.8 |
14.2
(0.3)
RWAs
Our RWAs are
|
|
Capital |
Regulatory |
FX and |
Others |
|
|
Generation * |
deductions |
RWAs |
- Includes profits and movement in reserves, net of ordinary dividends, AT1 coupon payments and share buy-backs.
RWAs
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
$bn |
$bn |
|
Credit risk |
683.9 |
679.1 |
|
Counterparty credit risk |
35.5 |
37.1 |
|
Market risk |
37.5 |
37.6 |
|
Operational risk |
97.2 |
85.9 |
|
Total RWAs |
854.1 |
839.7 |
Liquidity
The average Group 'LCR' was 136% or
The average Group 'NSFR' was 133%. At
Liquidity
LCR (%)
NSFR (%)
- 132
- 136
|
|
4 |
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Key metrics
The table below sets out the key regulatory metrics covering the Group's available capital (including buffer requirements and ratios), RWAs, Leverage ratio, LCR and NSFR. Unless stated otherwise, figures have been prepared on an IFRS 9 transitional basis. Capital figures and ratios are reported on a CRR II transitional basis for capital instruments and the leverage ratio is calculated using the CRR II end point basis for capital. The calculation for LCR is the average of the preceding 12 months for each quarter and NSFR is the average of the preceding four quarters.
Table 1: Key metrics (KM1/IFRS9-FL)
|
At |
||||||
|
31 Dec |
30 Sep |
30 Jun |
31 Mar |
31 Dec |
||
|
Ref |
2023 |
2023 |
2023 |
2023 |
2022 |
|
|
Available capital ($bn) |
||||||
|
1 |
Common equity tier 1 ('CET1') capital |
126.5 |
124.8 |
126.4 |
125.7 |
119.3 |
|
CET1 capital as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied |
126.4 |
124.8 |
126.4 |
125.7 |
119.0 |
|
|
2 |
Tier 1 capital |
144.2 |
142.5 |
145.8 |
145.1 |
139.1 |
|
Tier 1 capital as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied |
144.1 |
142.5 |
145.8 |
145.1 |
138.8 |
|
|
3 |
Total capital |
171.2 |
165.5 |
170.0 |
169.6 |
162.4 |
|
Total capital as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied |
171.1 |
165.5 |
170.0 |
169.6 |
162.1 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets ($bn) |
||||||
|
4 |
Total RWAs |
854.1 |
840.0 |
859.5 |
854.4 |
839.7 |
|
Total RWAs as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied |
854.0 |
840.0 |
859.5 |
854.4 |
839.4 |
|
|
Capital ratios (%) |
||||||
|
5 |
CET1 (%) |
14.8 |
14.9 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.2 |
|
CET1 as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied (%) |
14.8 |
14.9 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.2 |
|
|
6 |
Tier 1 (%) |
16.9 |
17.0 |
17.0 |
17.0 |
16.6 |
|
Tier 1 as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied (%) |
16.9 |
17.0 |
17.0 |
17.0 |
16.5 |
|
|
7 |
Total capital (%) |
20.0 |
19.7 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
19.3 |
|
Total capital as if IFRS 9 transitional arrangements had not been applied (%) |
20.0 |
19.7 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
19.3 |
|
|
Additional own funds requirements based on Supervisory Review and Evaluation |
||||||
|
Process ('SREP') as a percentage of RWAs (%) |
||||||
|
|
Additional CET1 SREP requirements (%) |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
|
Additional tier 1 ('AT1') SREP requirements (%) |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
Additional tier 2 ('T2') SREP requirements (%) |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
Total SREP own funds requirements (%) |
10.6 |
10.6 |
10.6 |
10.6 |
10.6 |
|
Combined buffer requirement as a percentage of RWAs (%) |
||||||
|
8 |
Capital conservation buffer requirement (%) |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
9 |
Institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer (%) |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
10 |
Global systemically important institution buffer (%) |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
11 |
Combined buffer requirement (%) |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
|
Overall capital requirements (%) |
15.8 |
15.8 |
15.6 |
15.5 |
15.5 |
|
12 |
CET1 available after meeting the total SREP own funds requirements (%) |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.2 |
|
Leverage ratio |
||||||
|
13 |
Total exposure measure excluding claims on central banks ($bn) |
2,574.8 |
2,478.3 |
2,497.9 |
2,486.1 |
2,417.2 |
|
14 |
Leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%) |
5.6 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
|
Average exposure measure excluding claims on central banks ($bn) |
2,498.6 |
2,491.1 |
2,506.5 |
2,454.8 |
2,416.6 |
|
|
Additional leverage ratio disclosure requirements (%) |
||||||
|
14a |
Fully loaded expected credit losses ('ECL') accounting model leverage ratio excluding |
5.6 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
|
claims on central banks (%) |
||||||
|
14b |
Leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%) |
4.8 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
|
14c |
Average leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%) |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
|
14d |
Average leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%) |
4.9 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
|
14e |
Countercyclical leverage ratio buffer (%) |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
EU-14d |
Leverage ratio buffer requirement (%) |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|
EU-14e |
Overall leverage ratio requirements (%) |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
|
Liquidity coverage ratio ('LCR') ($bn) |
||||||
|
15 |
Total high-quality liquid assets |
647.5 |
641.1 |
631.2 |
634.9 |
647.0 |
|
|
Cash outflows - total weighted value |
672.3 |
673.8 |
672.2 |
670.4 |
668.1 |
|
|
Cash inflows - total weighted value |
195.2 |
197.0 |
194.5 |
188.7 |
177.3 |
|
16 |
Total net cash outflow |
477.1 |
476.8 |
477.7 |
481.7 |
490.8 |
|
17 |
LCR (%) |
136 |
134 |
132 |
132 |
132 |
|
Net stable funding ratio ('NSFR') ($bn) |
||||||
|
18 |
Total available stable funding |
1,601.9 |
1,599.2 |
1,575.2 |
1,557.4 |
1,552.0 |
|
19 |
Total required stable funding |
1,202.4 |
1,196.6 |
1,171.8 |
1,148.4 |
1,138.4 |
|
20 |
NSFR (%) |
133 |
134 |
134 |
136 |
136 |
For further details of the application of IFRS 9 transitional regulatory arrangements, see page 209 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023.
HSBC Holdings plc Pillar 3 2023
The Group is subject to the basic minimum capital requirements set out in Article 92 (1) of CRR II, namely that it maintain:
- Common equity tier 1 capital at 4.5% of RWAs;
- Tier 1 capital (CET1 capital plus AT1 capital) at 6% of RWAs; and
- Total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) at 8% of RWAs.
Rows
Rows 8 to 11 set out buffer requirements to which the Group is also subject (and which must be satisfied by CET1). The Group's overall capital requirement in Row
IFRS 9 transitional arrangements
We have adopted the regulatory transitional arrangements in CRR II for IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments', including paragraph four of article 473a. These allow banks to add back to their capital base a proportion of the impact that IFRS 9 has upon their loan loss allowances. Our capital and ratios are presented under these arrangements throughout the tables in this disclosure, including the end point figures.
Regulatory developments
In
In the consultation, the PRA set out its intention to implement the package on
In
Near-final rules in relation to the market risk, credit valuation adjustments, counterparty risk and operational risk elements of the
Near final rules on the remaining parts of the
Across other major jurisdictions that are key to
- In
December 2023 , theHong Kong Monetary Authority ('HKMA') published its finalBasel 3.1 rules and delayed the implementation of the rules to1 January 2025 with market risk and CVA reporting commencing1 July 2024 . - In
December 2023 , the EU published a near-final draft of the amendments to the CRR to implementBasel 3.1. The majority of the provisions are expected to apply from1 January 2025 .
- In
July 2023 , US regulators published their proposals for the implementation ofBasel 3.1 with a scheduled implementation date of1 July 2025 . The consultation closed inJanuary 2024 .
Future regulatory framework
In
Environmental, Social and Governance risk
Globally, regulators and standard setters continue to publish multiple proposals and discussion papers on environmental, social and governance ('ESG') topics. In recent years, this included multiple consultations on sustainability-related disclosure across jurisdictions including the
The work by
Climate risk
Our climate risk approach is aligned to the framework outlined by the
- physical risk, which arises from the increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and floods, or chronic gradual shifts in weather patterns or rises in sea level; and
- transition risk, which arises from the process of moving to a net zero economy, including changes in government policy and legislation, technology, market demand, and reputational implications triggered by a change in stakeholder expectations, action or inaction.
In addition to these primary drivers of climate risk, we have also identified the following thematic issues related to climate risk, which are most likely to materialise in the form of reputational, regulatory compliance and litigation risks:
- net zero alignment risk, which arises from the risk of
HSBC failing to meet its net zero commitments or failing to meet external expectations related to net zero, because of inadequate ambition and/or plans, poor execution, or inability to adapt to changes in the external environment; and - the risk of greenwashing, which arises from the act of knowingly or unknowingly making inaccurate, unclear, misleading or unsubstantiated claims regarding sustainability to our stakeholders.
For further details of climate risk, see pages 64 and 221 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023.
|
|
6 |
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Key changes and regulatory assessments
In 2023 the below changes have impacted our capital and liquidity adequacy. We also continue to assess the impact of future regulatory changes expected through
IFRS 17 'Insurance Contracts'
We adopted IFRS 17 on
For further details on the effects of the adoption of IFRS 17, see Note 38 on page 422.of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023.
From
Non-performing Exposures
In 2023, the PRA revoked the requirement to deduct from CET1 capital the applicable amount of insufficient coverage for non- performing exposures. Reversing this deduction had a 0.1 percentage point impact to the CET1 ratio.
In
Planned sale of our retail banking operations in
During the fourth quarter of 2023, the planned sale of HSBC Continental Europe's retail banking operations in
For further details of assets held for sale, liabilities of disposal groups
held for sale and business acquisitions, see Note 23 on page 401 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023.
Liquidity coverage ratio
For the disclosure of the LCR, we follow Article 451a of CRR II.
For further details of our approach to managing Liquidity Risk, see Treasury Risk management section on page 14.
We have recognised a charge of
For further details of significant accounting judgements, see page 106 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2023.
In
The RWA output floor under
HSBC Holdings plc Pillar 3 2023
Linkage to the Annual Report and Accounts 2023
This section demonstrates the links between the Group's audited financial balance sheet and its regulatory counterpart. In addition to the reconciliation presented here in Table 2, our Pillar 3 Disclosures at
- an analysis of the regulatory reporting balance sheet by risk type; and
- a reconciliation between accounting valuation and the regulatory measure of exposure.
Structure of the regulatory group
The regulatory consolidation is consistent with the accounting consolidation, with the following exceptions:
- the subsidiaries engaged in insurance activities are equity accounted in the regulatory consolidation and then deducted from CET1 capital, subject to thresholds;
- the special purpose entities ('SPEs') are excluded where significant risk has been transferred to third parties. Exposures to these SPEs are risk weighted as securitisation positions for regulatory purposes;
- the participating interests in banking associates are proportionally consolidated for regulatory purposes by including our share of assets, liabilities, profits and losses, and RWAs in accordance with the PRA's regulatory requirements; and,
- non-participatingsignificant investments are deducted from capital, subject to thresholds.
For further details of the differences between the accounting and regulatory scope of consolidation and their definition of exposure, see pages 8 to 11.
The table below presents the reconciliation between the Group's financial balance sheet and the regulatory scope of consolidation. The regulatory balance sheet value cannot be directly reconciled to other tables within the regulatory scope of consolidation as it is not a measure of RWAs, but rather, it is derived from an accounting measure.
Table 2: Reconciliation of regulatory own funds to balance sheet in the audited financial statements (
|
Equity |
|||||
|
Accounting |
Deconsolidation |
Consolidation |
accounting |
Regulatory |
|
|
balance |
of insurance/ |
of banking |
of Insurance |
balance |
|
|
sheet |
other entities |
associates |
subsidiaries |
sheet |
|
|
Ref † |
$m |
$m |
$m |
$m |
$m |
|
Assets |
|||||
|
Cash and balances at central banks |
285,868 |
(12) |
400 |
- |
286,256 |
|
Items in the course of collection from other banks |
6,342 |
- |
- |
- |
6,342 |
|
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness |
42,024 |
- |
- |
- |
42,024 |
|
Trading assets |
289,159 |
(8,016) |
16 |
- |
281,159 |
|
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at |
110,643 |
(101,133) |
823 |
- |
10,333 |
|
fair value through profit or loss |
- of which: debt securities eligible as tier 2 issued by Group Financial Sector Entities ('FSEs') that are outside the regulatory scope of
|
consolidation |
s |
- |
138 |
- |
- |
138 |
|
|
Derivatives |
229,714 |
(14) |
316 |
- |
230,016 |
||
|
Loans and advances to banks |
l |
112,902 |
(1,597) |
1,389 |
- |
112,694 |
|
|
Loans and advances to customers |
l |
938,535 |
3 |
17,486 |
- |
956,024 |
|
|
- |
of which: lending eligible as Tier 2 to Group FSEs outside the |
- |
333 |
- |
- |
333 |
|
|
regulatory scope of consolidation |
s |
||||||
|
- |
expected credit losses on IRB portfolios |
h |
(8,277) |
- |
- |
- |
(8,277) |
|
Reverse repurchase agreements - non-trading |
252,217 |
1,351 |
51 |
- |
253,619 |
||
|
Financial investments |
442,763 |
(16,545) |
7,278 |
- |
433,496 |
||
|
- |
of which: lending eligible as Tier 2 to Group FSEs outside the |
- |
556 |
- |
- |
556 |
|
|
regulatory scope of consolidation |
s |
||||||
|
Assets held for sale |
114,134 |
- |
- |
- |
114,134 |
||
|
- |
of which: goodwill and intangible assets |
e |
232 |
- |
- |
- |
232 |
|
- |
of which: expected credit losses on IRB portfolios |
h |
(294) |
- |
- |
- |
(294) |
|
Capital invested in insurance and other entities |
- |
3,756 |
- |
4,054 |
7,810 |
||
|
- of which -positive goodwill on acquisition |
e |
- |
237 |
- |
- |
237 |
|
|
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets |
165,255 |
(7,896) |
640 |
- |
157,999 |
||
|
- |
of which: retirement benefit assets |
j |
7,750 |
- |
- |
- |
7,750 |
|
Current tax assets |
1,536 |
14 |
- |
- |
1,550 |
||
|
Interests in associates and joint ventures |
27,344 |
(454) |
(5,672) |
- |
21,218 |
||
|
- |
of which: positive goodwill on acquisition |
e |
475 |
(11) |
- |
- |
464 |
|
|
e |
12,487 |
(423) |
953 |
- |
13,017 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
f, k |
7,754 |
(918) |
67 |
- |
6,903 |
|
|
Total assets at |
3,038,677 |
(131,884) |
23,747 |
4,054 |
2,934,594 |
||
|
Liabilities and equity |
|||||||
|
|
42,024 |
- |
- |
- |
42,024 |
||
|
Deposits by banks |
73,163 |
(9) |
2,476 |
- |
75,630 |
||
|
Customer accounts |
1,611,647 |
2,937 |
18,852 |
- |
1,633,436 |
||
|
Repurchase agreements - non-trading |
172,100 |
(127) |
292 |
- |
172,265 |
||
|
Items in course of transmission to other banks |
7,295 |
- |
- |
- |
7,295 |
||
|
Trading liabilities |
73,150 |
- |
- |
- |
73,150 |
||
|
Financial liabilities designated at fair value |
141,426 |
(4,395) |
- |
- |
137,031 |
||
|
- |
of which: |
11,399 |
- |
- |
- |
11,399 |
|
|
included in tier 2 |
o, q, i |
|
|
8 |
Pillar 3 Disclosures at
Table 2: Reconciliation of regulatory own funds to balance sheet in the audited financial statements (
|
Equity |
||||||
|
Accounting |
Deconsolidation |
Consolidation |
accounting |
Regulatory |
||
|
balance |
of insurance/ |
of banking |
of Insurance |
balance |
||
|
sheet |
other entities |
associates |
subsidiaries |
sheet |
||
|
Ref † |
$m |
$m |
$m |
$m |
$m |
|
|
Derivatives |
234,772 |
(23) |
272 |
- |
235,021 |
|
|
- of which: debit valuation adjustment |
l |
54 |
- |
- |
- |
54 |
|
Debt securities in issue |
93,917 |
(863) |
- |
- |
93,054 |
|
|
Liabilities of disposals group held for sale |
108,406 |
- |
- |
- |
108,406 |
|
|
- of which: credit-related contingent liabilities and contractual |
20 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
|
|
commitments on IRB portfolios |
h |
|||||
|
Accruals, deferred income and other liabilities |
136,606 |
(4,339) |
1,243 |
- |
133,510 |
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
||||||
|
Current tax liabilities |
2,777 |
(256) |
140 |
- |
2,661 |
|
|
Insurance contract liabilities |
120,851 |
(120,851) |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Provisions |
1,741 |
(20) |
89 |
- |
1,810 |
|
|
- of which: credit-related contingent liabilities and contractual |
477 |
- |
- |
- |
477 |
|
|
commitments on IRB portfolios |
h |
|||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
1,238 |
(6) |
3 |
- |
1,235 |
|
|
Subordinated liabilities |
24,954 |
- |
420 |
- |
25,374 |
|
|
- of which: included in tier 2 |
o, p, q, r |
23,047 |
- |
- |
- |
23,047 |
|
Total liabilities at |
2,846,067 |
(127,952) |
23,787 |
- |
2,741,902 |
|
|
Equity |
||||||
|
Called up share capital |
a |
9,631 |
- |
- |
- |
9,631 |
|
Share premium account |
a |
14,738 |
- |
- |
- |
14,738 |
|
Other equity instruments |
m |
17,719 |
- |
- |
- |
17,719 |
|
Other reserves |
c, g |
(8,907) |
2,198 |
(133) |
6,531 |
(311) |
|
Retained earnings |
b, c |
152,148 |
(5,950) |
133 |
(2,477) |
143,854 |
|
Total shareholders' equity |
185,329 |
(3,752) |
- |
4,054 |
185,631 |
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
d, n, q |
7,281 |
(180) |
(40) |
- |
7,061 |
|
Total equity at |
192,610 |
(3,932) |
(40) |
4,054 |
192,692 |
|
|
Total liabilities and equity at |
3,038,677 |
(131,884) |
23,747 |
4,054 |
2,934,594 |
- The references (a)-(s) identify balance sheet components that are used in the calculation of regulatory capital in Table 6: Composition of regulatory own funds (
UK CC1)'.This table shows such items at their accounting values, which may be subject to analysis or adjustment in the calculation of regulatory capital shown in Table 6.
The table below lists the entities to which different accounting methods are applied under the regulatory scope of consolidation and refer to the structure of the regulatory group above.
Table 3: Principal entities with a different regulatory and accounting scope of consolidation (LI3)
|
At |
||||||
|
Method of regulatory consolidation |
||||||
|
Deducted |
||||||
|
Method of |
Neither |
from capital |
||||
|
accounting |
Proportional |
consolidated |
Equity |
subject to |
||
|
Principal activities |
consolidation |
consolidation |
nor deducted |
method |
thresholds |
|
|
Principal associates |
||||||
|
|
Banking services |
Equity |
• |
|||
|
Principal insurance entities |
||||||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Life insurance manufacturing |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
|
Reinsurance |
Fully consolidated |
• |
• |
||
|
Principal SPEs |
||||||
|
|
Securitisation |
Fully consolidated |
• |
|||
|
Neon Portfolio Distribution DAC |
Securitisation |
Fully consolidated |
• |
|||
|
Regency Assets DAC |
Securitisation |
Fully consolidated |
• |
HSBC Holdings plc Pillar 3 2023
Attachments
Disclaimer



Mike Causey’s ‘misclassified’ driver billed NC nearly $14,000 for trips, records say [The News & Observer (Raleigh)]
Mike Causey’s ‘misclassified’ driver billed NC nearly $14,000 for trips, records say [The News & Observer (Raleigh)]
Advisor News
- LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
- Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
- Metlife study finds less than half of US workforce holistically healthy
- Invigorating client relationships with AI coaching
- SEC: Get-rich-quick influencer Tai Lopez was running a Ponzi scam
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Trademark Application for “EMPOWER MY WEALTH” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Conning says insurers’ success in 2026 will depend on ‘strategic adaptation’
- The structural rise of structured products
- How next-gen pricing tech can help insurers offer better annuity products
- Continental General Acquires Block of Life Insurance, Annuity and Health Policies from State Guaranty Associations
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- NC Medicaid leaders seek new funding strategy as work rules loom
- Researchers to study universal health care, as Coloradans face $1 billion in medical debt
- Study Findings on Chronic Pain Are Outlined in Reports from Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University (Associations of Source and Continuity of Private Health Insurance with Prevalence of Chronic Pain among US Adults): Musculoskeletal Diseases and Conditions – Chronic Pain
- As health insurance costs rise, locals confront impacts
- Plainfield, Vermont Man Sentenced to 2 Years of Probation for Social Security Disability Fraud
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News