Patent Issued for Operator isolation based on data security requirements (USPTO 11023612) - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
June 22, 2021 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Patent Issued for Operator isolation based on data security requirements (USPTO 11023612)

Insurance Daily News

2021 JUN 22 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Insurance Daily News -- A patent by the inventors Branson, Michael J. (Rochester, MN, US), Koster, David M. (Reston, VA, US), Nikolai, Jason A. (Rochester, MN, US), Santosuosso, John M. (Rochester, MN, US), filed on September 27, 2018, was published online on June 1, 2021, according to news reporting originating from Alexandria, Virginia, by NewsRx correspondents.

Patent number 11023612 is assigned to International Business Machines Corporation (Armonk, New York, United States).

The following quote was obtained by the news editors from the background information supplied by the inventors: “Conventional systems may be tasked with processing data that has restrictions, such as the Protected Health Information (PHI) data involved with glucose monitoring of data for sugar in a health system that requires Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance or credit card data processing requiring Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance.

“In conventional systems, developers have to work with these security considerations and uniquely design applications to work in complicated configurations, where the application data considerations burden the developers and administrators. Some conventional systems may provide features required to operate in such environments.

“However, the cost of operating in these environments is significantly higher than in generic cloud environments that are not fully compliant with these standards. Thus, current solutions that utilize a compliant cloud environment for such applications may be very expensive to create and maintain.

“Also, in order to meet various compliance requirements, every employee working in the infrastructure has to be trained, resulting in delays and higher costs as the pool of available people for any problem is smaller. Furthermore, if a large amount of hardware is needed, the costs rise quickly as it is expensive to build large isolated portions of data centers.

“Some conventional systems use de-identification. De-identification may be described as removing personal identifiers from data. For example, a medical record with identification information “John Smith” contains blood work information, etc. De-identification removes “John Smith” and replaces this identification information with a value that cannot tie back to the individual. This allows for research and statistical studies in the medical field to be conducted without violating HIPAA and patient privacy.”

In addition to the background information obtained for this patent, NewsRx journalists also obtained the inventors’ summary information for this patent: “In accordance with embodiments, a computer-implemented method is provided for operator isolation based on data security requirements. The computer-implemented method comprises: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators. For each of the operators, it is determined whether the operator processes protected data. In response to determining that the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing. In response to determining that the operator is not tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant general node for processing. Then, while the tenant general node is processing the operator, in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, a tag is associated with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data and the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing.

“In accordance with other embodiments, a computer program product is provided for operator isolation based on data security requirements. The computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program code embodied therewith, the program code executable by at least one processor to perform operations comprising: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators. For each of the operators, it is determined whether the operator processes protected data. In response to determining that the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing. In response to determining that the operator is not tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant general node for processing. Then, while the tenant general node is processing the operator, in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, a tag is associated with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data and the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing.

“In yet other embodiments, a computer system is provided for operator isolation based on data security requirements. The computer system comprises one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories and one or more computer-readable, tangible storage devices; and program instructions, stored on at least one of the one or more computer-readable, tangible storage devices for execution by at least one of the one or more processors via at least one of the one or more memories, to perform operations comprising: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators. For each of the operators, it is determined whether the operator processes protected data. In response to determining that the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing. In response to determining that the operator is not tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data, the operator is forwarded to the tenant general node for processing. Then, while the tenant general node is processing the operator, in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, a tag is associated with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data and the operator is forwarded to the tenant secure node for processing.”

The claims supplied by the inventors are:

“1. A computer-implemented method, comprising operations for: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators; for each of the operators, determining whether the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data; in response to determining that the operator is tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; in response to determining that the operator is not tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant general node for processing; and while the tenant general node is processing the operator, determining whether the operator is processing protected data; in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, associating a tag with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data; and forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; and in response to determining that the operator is not processing protected data, processing the operator at the tenant general node.

“2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising operations for: associating a tag with an ingest portion of data of the ingest portions of data to indicate that the data for the ingest portion is protected data.

“3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the tag associated with the operator is for one of personal health information and personal identifiable information.

“4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising operations for: using at least one of rule-based patterns and learned patterns to determine whether each of the operators processes protected data.

“5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the graph is for a tenant streaming application that is compiled to generate a Streams Application Bundle (SAB) file.

“6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the tenant secure node has an underlying compliance infrastructure to ensure that pre-defined rules are being followed to process the protected data.

“7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a Software as a Service (SaaS) is configured to perform the operations of the computer-implemented method.

“8. A computer program product, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program code embodied therewith, the program code executable by at least one processor to perform operations for: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators; for each of the operators, determining whether the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data; in response to determining that the operator is tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; in response to determining that the operator is not tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant general node for processing; and while the tenant general node is processing the operator, determining whether the operator is processing protected data; in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, associating a tag with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data; and forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; and in response to determining that the operator is not processing protected data, processing the operator at the tenant general node.

“9. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein the program code is executable by the at least one processor to perform operations for: associating a tag with an ingest portion of data of the ingest portions of data to indicate that the data for the ingest portion is protected data.

“10. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein the tag associated with the operator is for one of personal health information and personal identifiable information.

“11. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein the program code is executable by the at least one processor to perform operations for: using at least one of rule-based patterns and learned patterns to determine whether each of the operators processes protected data.

“12. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein the graph is for a tenant streaming application that is compiled to generate a Streams Application Bundle (SAB) file.

“13. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein the tenant secure node has an underlying compliance infrastructure to ensure that pre-defined rules are being followed to process the protected data.

“14. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein a Software as a Service (SaaS) is configured to perform the operations of the computer program product.

“15. A computer system, comprising: one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories and one or more computer-readable, tangible storage devices; and program instructions, stored on at least one of the one or more computer-readable, tangible storage devices for execution by at least one of the one or more processors via at least one of the one or more computer-readable memories, to perform operations comprising: at a cloud node coupled to a tenant secure node and a tenant general node, receiving a graph that includes ingest portions of data and operators; for each of the operators, determining whether the operator is tagged with an indication that the operator processes protected data; in response to determining that the operator is tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; in response to determining that the operator is not tagged with the indication that the operator processes protected data, forwarding the operator to the tenant general node for processing; and while the tenant general node is processing the operator, determining whether the operator is processing protected data; in response to determining that the operator is processing protected data, associating a tag with the operator to indicate that the operator processes protected data; and forwarding the operator to the tenant secure node for processing; and in response to determining that the operator is not processing protected data, processing the operator at the tenant general node.

“16. The computer system of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise: associating a tag with an ingest portion of data of the ingest portions of data to indicate that the data for the ingest portion is protected data.

“17. The computer system of claim 15, wherein the tag associated with the operator is for one of personal health information and personal identifiable information.

“18. The computer system of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise: using at least one of rule-based patterns and learned patterns to determine whether each of the operators processes protected data.

“19. The computer system of claim 15, wherein the graph is for a tenant streaming application that is compiled to generate a Streams Application Bundle (SAB) file.

“20. The computer system of claim 15, wherein a Software as a Service (SaaS) is configured to perform the operations of the computer system.”

URL and more information on this patent, see: Branson, Michael J. Operator isolation based on data security requirements. U.S. Patent Number 11023612, filed September 27, 2018, and published online on June 1, 2021. Patent URL: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=11023612.PN.&OS=PN/11023612RS=PN/11023612

(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)

Older

Dealing with a flooded basement after Sunday night’s storm? Here’s what you need to know about insurance coverage.

Newer

HEALTH INSURANCE SERVICES

Advisor News

  • The rise of the ‘gray divorce’ insurance client
  • Succession planning: Building the future of your practice
  • From loss to security: Supporting widowed clients with life insurance
  • Plan now for lower Social Security benefits later
  • The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
  • Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
  • Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
  • The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
  • Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Sen. Gary Dahms, R-Redwood Falls, named health insurance "Champion of Affordability"
  • What is most important to consider when choosing an Advantage Plan?
  • Executive benefits evolve beyond retention as workforce pressures mount
  • Young and insured? You could still face thousands in medical bills
  • Wildfire smoke, increasing in frequency, has implications for morbidity
Sponsor
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • NAIC SUMMER NATIONAL MEETING HIGHLIGHTS COLLABORATION AND ADVANCES PRIORITIES
  • Wildfire smoke, increasing in frequency, has implications for morbidity
  • Record IUL sales don’t diminish the need for continued customer engagement
  • Benchmark International Successfully Facilitated the Transaction Between National Group Marketing Trust and New Era Life Insurance Companies
  • Why the bond market is flexing its muscles, and why everyone needs to care
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Classic Car Insurer OpenRoad Insurance Expands to 40 U.S. States in Two Years
  • How Aspire General Turned an Early Technology Bet Into Claims Automation at Scale with Kyber
  • Adjusto launches AI-Native contents claims services powered by its technology platform
  • URL Insurance Group Celebrates 40 Years of Service, Growth, and Industry Leadership
  • MassMutual Ascend Surpasses $2 Billion in Lifetime Advisory Annuity Sales, Reflecting Continued Momentum in RIA Channel
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet