‘None of us have any idea’: Medicaid expansion hinges on GOP-controlled Kansas Senate
One lawmaker called it "monumental" after nearly a decade spent trying to get the conservative state to open up the state-run health program to more Kansans.
Even Democratic presidential candidate
But expansion hopes will collide with political reality in the state
In the coming weeks, tens of thousands of Kansans who would qualify for expanded Medicaid--those currently ineligible because they make too much, but too little to qualify for the Affordable Care Act--will watch what path senators take.
What they can expect is a messy, unpredictable journey.
Lawmakers could strike a grand bargain: Medicaid expansion in exchange for something its opponents want, perhaps a tax cut. They could deploy unusual procedural tactics to force votes. It's also possible legislators will delay action until next year in favor of more study.
Or they could do nothing at all.
"None of us have any idea how this is going to move forward at this point, but this is one of the governor's and the majority of the Legislature's ... both of their priorities," said Sen.
A bargain may offer expansion supporters their best shot at sending a plan to Kelly, who would almost certainly sign it into law. It could play a powerful role in negotiations as lawmakers try to strike deals and get out of
"I think at the end of the day it's going to be in a mix of a number of different issues before we can bring the gavel down on the 2019 session," Senate Minority Leader
With
Senate Majority Leader
Denning, who has opposed expansion in the past, expressed concerns about how it would affect the budget. He also warned that once the state applies for permission to expand, it's in the hands of the federal government.
"You don't come back next year and fix it," he said. "She's going to have to tell me where she's heading.
Murky path
Similar action is much less likely in the
The rules require a two-thirds supermajority of 27 votes to force debate on a bill. Short of that, Republican leaders exert total control over what bills are brought to the floor.
Twenty-five senators supported expansion in 2017, two shy of what's needed to force debate. That has likely dropped to 24 because Sen.
"I think the Senate Republican leadership should take a lesson from what happened over in the House, that they ought to let people have an opportunity to debate and vote on the bill," Hensley said.
Under the normal legislative process, bills are sent to a committee and a hearing is held. The committee, after working on the proposal, then votes on whether to send it to the full House or
Committees in the
A leading proponent, the
"I think it's probably going to be similar to the House path in that it's not going to take the traditional route of committee hearings, committee debate, floor debate -- some of those things your normal bill would do," Holman said.
'A lot of game playing'
While the specifics have shifted from year to year, the broad outlines of Medicaid expansion remain the same: the federal government pays 90 percent of the cost with states chipping in the last ten percent.
In order to qualify,
Estimates place the annual cost to
Kelly has expressed confidence the Legislature will expand Medicaid this year, while acknowledging the power Republican leaders to thwart action.
"There's been a lot of game playing with that," Kelly said in an interview last week, conducted before the House vote. "The leadership of both the
Republican opponents have questioned whether the federal government will hold up its end of the deal into the future. Democratic and Republican supporters say the program will expand health coverage and also aid financially struggling rural hospitals.
Kansas House Majority Leader
More study wanted
"
Sen.
He said he is open to talking with all sides on and looking for a compromise going into the 2020 session.
"It would be my hope that we do an interim (committee) during the summer and take a look at it carefully and come out with an approach that we feel like makes sense," Suellentrop said.
Bollier rejects that idea. Lawmakers have years of data to look at from states that have already expanded, she said. And organizations like the
"There is no need for an interim study," Bollier said. "We have had years of information."
___
(c)2019 The Wichita Eagle (Wichita, Kan.)
Visit The Wichita Eagle (Wichita, Kan.) at www.kansas.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


UND prepares for potential spring flooding
Act of God? In Fight Over Flood, Farmers Blame Army Corps Of Engineers
Advisor News
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Minnesota seniors face tough choices for health plans
- Recent Findings from New York University (NYU) Langone Health Provide New Insights into Managed Care (State Medicaid Body Mass Index Requirements for Solid Organ Transplant Coverage: A 50-State Policy Review): Managed Care
- After booting 760K off ACA health plans, the Trump administration adds some people back
- New Findings from University of Hawaii at Manoa in the Area of Science Reported (Expanded Medi-Cal Coverage and Persisting Access Barriers for Latino Immigrants in California): Science
- What’s shaping retirement readiness in healthcare?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News