My Turn: Brittany Ricci: Insurance algorithms shouldn’t dictate treatment
Imagine a system in which a patient gets the right medication for their chronic illness the first time around: the medication their doctor is confident will be effective and the patient feels most comfortable taking. I have witnessed firsthand that, for certain diseases, this is not how the healthcare system currently operates.
That's why I'm speaking out to urge
I was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis my freshman year at
But, about three years ago, right before the beginning of medical school, my symptoms began to present themselves again and this time even more aggressively. I had developed a pocket of infection near my colon, and, after another colonoscopy, my diagnosis was changed to Crohn's disease. It was painful to stand, to sit, to walk, and my medical team decided we needed to be more aggressive with our treatment plan. The medications I had been on up to this point are simply not effective for the type of Crohn's I have.
However, after settling on a new medication regimen, I got a call from my gastroenterologist saying that my insurance company denied the request to start the recommended treatment. I was told I would have to "fail" on treatment with another medication as dictated by my insurance company before I could start on what my doctor had recommended. I was honestly a bit shocked to hear this. I knew insurance companies could deny medications, but this case seemed pretty straightforward to me. There was clear scientific evidence to back this treatment over other medications. Wasn't that enough?
This process is known as step therapy -- and it needs to be reined in. As a medical student, I understand the role that cost plays in our medical system. But, as a patient and future doctor, I cannot stand by and let insurance companies and pharmacy benefits managers dictate treatment plans that are less effective for patients.
S0772/H5806 have been introduced in the
Because this type of legislation was not in place when my request to start a particular medication was denied, I was left with no choice but to take the medication as dictated by the treatment algorithm used by my insurer.
That algorithm ended up being very bad math both for my health and overall healthcare costs. Though I eventually got the medication that was initially recommended to me after about a year, I had numerous trips to the hospital, three surgeries and other complications.
Today, I am doing much better but still dealing with the repercussions of the damage step therapy caused. I can't help but ask -- was all this suffering really necessary for me to get access to a medication that was recommended to me months earlier?
We will all be patients at some point, and that's why I'm asking lawmakers in
At the end of the day isn't that what we all expect when we seek medical care? For the role of doctor to be filled by the doctor -- not a treatment algorithm.
___
(c)2019 The Providence Journal (Providence, R.I.)
Visit The Providence Journal (Providence, R.I.) at www.projo.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



CORRECTING and REPLACING Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Files Securities Class Action on Behalf of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. Investors (RMED)
CORRECTING and REPLACING INVESTOR ALERT: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Announces the Filing of a Securities Class Action on Behalf of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. Investors (RMED)
Advisor News
- The modern advisor: Merging income, insurance, and investments
- Financial shocks, caregiving gaps and inflation pressures persist
- Americans unprepared for increased longevity
- More investors will seek comprehensive financial planning
- Midlife planning for women: why it matters and how advisors should adapt
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- LIMRA: Annuity sales notch 10th consecutive $100B+ quarter
- AIG to sell remaining shares in Corebridge Financial
- Corebridge Financial, Equitable Holdings post Q1 earnings as merger looms
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to Calix Re Limited
- Transamerica introduces new RILA with optional income features
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- SENATE APPROVES BILL TO LIMIT PREMIUM INCREASES, PROTECT ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- All about AHCCCS: Navigating Arizona Medicaid’s changing landscape
- GOVERNOR SIGNS BIOMARKER TESTING COVERAGE BILL
- REGULATION OF AI IN PRIOR AUTHORIZATION AND CLAIMS REVIEW: A LOOK AT FEDERAL AND STATE CONSUMER PROTECTIONS
- LEADING HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS URGE NC LAWMAKERS TO RECONSIDER PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTING MEDICAID CUTS
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 2025 Insurance Abstracts
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to Tokio Marine Newa Insurance Co., Ltd.
- Earnings roundup: Prudential works to save ‘unique’ Japanese market
- How life insurance became a living-benefits strategy
- Financial Focus : Keep your beneficiary choices up to date
More Life Insurance News