Missouri woman presents her case for innocence. Her lawyers point to cop as suspect [The Kansas City Star]
Attorneys for a woman who has been behind bars for 43 years attacked the veracity of her conviction in court this week, shifting evidence of the murder onto a former
If Hemme is exonerated, her prison term would mark the longest known wrongful conviction of a woman in
The only evidence linking Hemme, a psychiatric patient at the time, to the murder were her “wildly contradictory” and “factually impossible” statements extracted from detectives, her attorneys have said. No physical evidence or witnesses tied her to the crime.
Last July, Hemme was granted a hearing to present evidence of her innocence after her attorneys filed a 147-page petition laying out their claims.
That hearing began Tuesday in
Hemme, clad in a beige jumpsuit and black-rimmed eyeglasses, listened Wednesday as
Fueston said he stopped one of those interviews because “she didn’t seem totally coherent.”
Over eight sessions of questioning, Hemme’s attorneys with the
Hemme’s legal team said evidence instead points to
Police practices expert
Policing consultant
He said confessions need to be corroborated as well as examined for contamination, which occurs in many ways, including through details in media reports.
During earlier testimony, the
But during Trainum’s testimony, Hemme’s attorneys showed photos from a
Trainum said that after several police interviews, reports showed detectives “still had to prompt her, ask her some leading questions.”
Hemme’s statements, he said, also contained factual errors. “They would raise red flags,” Trainum told the court.
He said investigators should not ignore or dismiss evidence that support an alternative suspect or theory.
Holman had been a suspect and was questioned one time. He told investigators he used Jeschke’s credit card after finding a purse in a ditch. His truck was also seen in the area of the murder; the alibi he provided about why he was nearby could not be corroborated. And a pair of gold horseshoe-shaped earrings identified by Jeschke’s father was found in Holman’s possession.
The
Former prosecutor
Judge
Robb, who is now a judge in
Under Hayes, police elicited a false confession from
Sean O’Brien, an attorney for Hemme, asked Robb, “Did you believe
“No,” Robb replied.
He went on to say that Hemme’s statements were the cornerstone of the prosecutor’s case and later characterized them as inconsistent.
O’Brien also pointed out that evidence that could have undergone forensic testing with newer technology had been destroyed.
“We could have answered a lot of questions with that,” Robb said.
©2024 The Kansas City Star. Visit kansascity.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
BRP Group, Inc. Announces Executive Appointments
California should require insurers to cover homeowners who protect property, advocate says [The Sacramento Bee]
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News