Methuen City Council fails to override insurance, no-confidence vetoes
Because six votes are needed to override a mayoral veto, the “no confidence” override vote failed on a 5-2 vote, with councilors
The health insurance override vote also failed on a 5-2 vote, with City Council Chair
By City Charter, six votes – or two-thirds of the nine-member council – are needed to override a mayoral veto. Because only seven members of the council are currently sitting on the council (two members resigned over the summer) it was more difficult to get the six-vote majority needed.
The council came under fire for holding the meeting on the second to last day of the current term and public speakers leveled numerous accusations of unethical behavior regarding the timing of the vote. There were also a handful of procedural complaints that First Assistant City Solicitor
The insurance resolution had gained widespread condemnation in part due to its potential cost to the city which could be more than
“I completely object to being included in the insurance vote,” School Committee Vice Chair
The resolution’s sponsor, Councilor
When a past council had chosen to forgo the option, councilors had also approved an increase in elected officials’ salaries.
Resident
“You do not have our best interests at heart,” Ell said.
Neither Beauregard nor Chief Administrative and Financial Officer
“We provided them with sufficient information, including reasons for the vetoes and an updated financial impact statement that includes health plan costs for the School Committee,” Beauregard said prior to the meeting.
In a statement announcing his vetoes, Beauregard had also criticized a council vote of no-confidence against the School Committee and former Superintendent
The council no-confidence resolution vetoed by Beauregard cited poor student performance tests and a toxic administration among other critiques of the district leadership.
A third veto regarding private roads was approved on a 6-1 vote, with DiZoglio the lone dissenter. The resolution is intended to make it easier for residents on private roads to obtain help from the city with road repairs or improvements. Opponents, including Beauregard who vetoed the resolution, have said the change only benefits residents on those roads and could result in a high cost to the city.
In a financial analysis document, Duprey outlined some of the potential costs of the private ways rule change, noting that “a larger pool of projects ... could come forward” and that the city “would need to plan accordingly for specific projects with an appropriate funding source.”
Next month four newly elected councilors will be sworn in to the nine-member body.
© 2025 The Eagle-Tribune (North Andover, Mass.). Visit www.eagletribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Global M&A rebounds in 2025 led by media, mining and tech megadeals
Animal cruelty, breast exams, new Florida laws taking effect on Jan. 1
Advisor News
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News