Low-income patients experience greatest financial burden from health insurance claim denials: University of Massachusetts Amherst
2025 JUL 10 (NewsRx) -- By a
In addition, when the low-income patients or their providers do fight these denials of payment for “free” preventive care or “shoppable” medical services, the outcomes are less successful than those of higher income patients.
“People with higher income are more likely to have a denied claim reversed and consequently their cost sharing reduced,” says
The findings, published in the journal Health Affairs, are the latest in Horny’s ongoing research into health insurance disparities across demographic and socioeconomic dimensions.
In an earlier paper published in JAMA Network Open, Horny and co-authors found that low-income patients were 43% more likely than high-income patients to have their health insurance claims denied for such preventive care as cancer, diabetes, cholesterol and depression screenings, as well as contraception administration and wellness visits. And historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups were roughly twice as likely as non-Hispanic whites to incur denials.
“Our new findings further exacerbate the disparity that we established initially,” Horny says. “We added the next step that not only are low-income people most likely to experience a denial, but they’re least likely to have it contested.”
The new research also found that historically marginalized groups were generally less likely to contest denials. However, when they-or their healthcare providers-did, they were more likely than non-Hispanic whites to be successful in their challenges to get their denials reversed. Still, the mean reduction in cost-sharing was lower among Black and Hispanic people than among whites.
“It is possible that minority patients were more likely to experience barriers to initiating a claim resubmission or reprocessing, including having access only to under-resourced healthcare providers, explicit or implicit bias, or structural racism,” the paper states. “It is also possible that some minority patients chose to contest only claim denials that were unequivocally wrong, and thus contesting them had a high chance of success.”
Horny did not find any association between education level and the likelihood of contesting denied claims or being successful in those challenges.
Horny and team-including
The researchers did not have access to who initiated the challenge of the claim denials. “When we launched this research, our mindset was that this is driven by the patient-that after receiving a letter from the insurer that the health plan is not going to pay for it, the patient would call the insurer and try to get the decision reversed,” Horny says. “But we realized that it actually can be driven by healthcare providers as well, because for healthcare providers it’s much easier to get money from a big company than from chasing many small amounts from many patients.”
Horny says there’s a need for rules and regulations to combat the systemic inequities the research documents. He hypothesizes that low-income people don’t have the flexibility in their jobs and lives to spend hours on the phone contesting a denial.
“We need regulators to demand health insurance companies be more user-friendly and allow people to contest a claim by filling out an online form 24/7, whenever they have the time to do it,” he says.
To make it easier for under-resourced healthcare providers (often the ones low-income and marginalized groups visit), Horny recommends universal billing codes among payers to simplify the claims process and reduce errors by both the providers and insurers.
“Our findings documented considerable administrative burden even for common, high-value health services, where unexpected bills continue to persist with an outsize effect on minoritized groups,” the paper notes.
(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)



Republican tax and spending cut megabill expected to take billions from Oregon Health Plan
Mental health care is limited in rural Minnesota. It’s also most vulnerable to Medicaid cuts.
Advisor News
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
- 6 in 10 Americans struggle with financial decisions
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Advocates call for hearing about Geisinger-Risant insurance condition change request
- Tucson Speaks Out: April 5
- El Rio taps experienced leader to oversee transition from North Country HealthCare to Elk Ridge
- Red ink at Minnesota Blue Cross spells more Medicare Advantage troubles ahead
- MEDICAID COST-SHARING LIMITATIONS AMENDED, ADVANCED
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CMB Wing Lung Insurance Company Limited
More Life Insurance News