Lawmakers to take another stab at ending claims abuses blamed for rate hikes
Insurers don't sound too confident as they prepare for Tuesday's start of the legislative session in
Solutions have eluded lawmakers because two powerful political forces -- insurers and trial lawyers -- have fought each other to a standstill.
"I would love to see both parties come up with a work product that would pass the Legislature," said
Consumers, not insurers or trial attorneys, will pay the price for another failure to enact reform. When costs increase for insurance companies, the companies pass those higher costs to homeowners in the form of higher rates.
This year, most
Banking and insurance panels from the state
Banking and insurance panels from the state
(
Insurers cited higher costs from claims abuses as they sought approval for rate increases throughout the year, and for the most part, the state
Insurers want to stop excessive lawsuits by repair contractors working under an affidavit called an assignment of benefits [AOB]. When homeowners sign the affidavit, contractors stand in their shoes when seeking payment from insurers for repair work.
Insurers contend that contractors and their attorneys, primarily from
Thousands of such suits are filed each year. Insurers say attorneys are motivated by a state law allowing customers to collect legal fees from insurers if the suit results in an insurer paying any amount of money over its initial settlement offer. Under the law, insurance customers do not have to pay insurers' legal fees if they don't prevail in a suit -- and that protection enables contractors and attorneys to file unlimited lawsuits while standing in homeowners' shoes.
Attorneys counter that lawsuits would be unnecessary if insurers would simply pay fair costs for repairs. Too often insurers leave homeowners and contractors with no choice but to sue by failing to pay what's necessary to return damaged homes to their pre-loss conditions.
Suddenly,
The
Suddenly,
The
(
In recent years, insurers and their allies in the Legislature have tried to enact laws barring homeowners from assigning claims without insurers' permission. But trial attorneys and their allies blocked those efforts, and courts affirmed assignment rights.
Last year, insurers changed strategy by helping to write a bill that would prohibit third-party assignees from collecting legal fees from insurers.
That failed when Sen.
Flores also refused to consider another bill, which passed the full House, that would have awarded legal fees according to a complicated formula. If enacted, contractors would get legal fees only if they win a settlement that exceeds a certain threshold, while insurers would collect legal fees from contractors if the settlement is less than or just a small amount more than insurers' initial offer.
Both bills have been reintroduced this year despite remaining unacceptable to trial lawyers and despite insurers' expectation that Flores won't place either on her committee's agenda.
Flores instead plans to open debate on a new bill, introduced by Sen.
Hurricane Irma delayed approval of
Rates for most of the company's 92,891 multiperil policyholders in
Hurricane Irma delayed approval of
Rates for most of the company's 92,891 multiperil policyholders in
(
Among the elements considered friendly to insurers are requirements that contractors provide a written scope of work to be performed and that consumers be allowed to rescind assignments within seven days. Contractors would be required to notify insurers of assignments within seven days of execution or 48 hours after beginning nonemergency repairs.
Written cost estimates would have to be submitted. Contractors working under assignments would be barred from pursuing claims against homeowners, except for the deductible amount or cost of work performed before any cancellation of the assignment.
But the bill includes no restrictions on contractors' ability to collect attorney's fees and in fact would prohibit insurers from passing along to its customers the cost of those attorneys fees.
"Attorneys fees and costs paid by a property insurer ... may not be included in the property insurer's rate base and may not be used to justify a rate increase or rate change," the bill states.
Flores said she knows this is as unacceptable to insurers as the bill barring contractors working under assignments from collecting attorneys fees is to trial attorneys.
"This is not a bill the insurance industry loves," Flores said in an interview Friday. "I haven't talked to them but I'm sure they hate it."
She said she hoped the bill would serve as a starting point for negotiations during the session, ending with some form of compromise between the two extreme positions.
"This bill is a start down the compromise process. Let's see what this accomplishes," she said.
But
Others organizations opposing the bill include state-run
But
___
(c)2018 the Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.)
Visit the Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) at www.sun-sentinel.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Report: California homeowners insurance more difficult to get after devastating wildfires
Attorney faces federal prison after admitting role in $23M auto insurance fraud
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News