Lawmakers ask if states or feds should alert about missiles
The state was slow to contain the situation, waiting 23 minutes to call officials with the
The confusion — and panic — have raised questions about whether any state should be solely responsible for notifying the public of such an event — especially as
They said in a letter to the committee Tuesday that it's understandable for states to have primary jurisdiction over warnings for floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters.
"However, when it comes to matters of national security, including whether a ballistic missile has been launched against
The debate comes as
The two networks that were activated in
The systems can be used by state and federal agencies for weather events, natural disasters, law enforcement notifications and alerts issued by the president.
Signal carriers allow people to block alerts from state and law enforcement agencies, but not those issued by the president.
"The decision to send a national alert directly to the public rests with the president,"
Gonzales said under the current system, it makes sense for states to handle alerts because they may be more familiar with local needs. But he acknowledged that since no state except
In addition, there is uncertainty about how long it takes for an alert to make its way to all cellphones since the nationwide system for mobile devices has never been tested, Gonzales said.
He said the process could add another five minutes, further cutting into the time that people have to prepare for a disaster.
Sending a national alert could cause more problems than a targeted alert, he said.
"I think you want to be careful about not causing panic everywhere," he said.
In case of a real launch,
It is estimated that a ballistic missile would take about 20 minutes to reach
There has never been a national emergency warning sent to mobile devices, radio or television,
President
Asked about the alert on Sunday, the president said it was "a state thing."
"I love that they took responsibility. They took total responsibility," Trump said. "But we're going to get involved. Their attitude and their — what they want to do, I think it's terrific. They took responsibility. They made a mistake."
Trump acknowledged people's fears, saying that "part of it is that people are on edge, but maybe, eventually, we'll solve the problem so they won't have to be so on edge."
He said it's important that people have faith in the warning system and that the state has a long way to go to rebuild trust.
AP writers


What are women marching for again on Saturday?
Udall, Heinrich will vote ‘no’ unless DREAMers are protected
Advisor News
- Succession planning: Building the future of your practice
- From loss to security: Supporting widowed clients with life insurance
- Plan now for lower Social Security benefits later
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Record IUL sales don’t diminish the need for continued customer engagement
- Benchmark International Successfully Facilitated the Transaction Between National Group Marketing Trust and New Era Life Insurance Companies
- Why the bond market is flexing its muscles, and why everyone needs to care
- An Application for the Trademark “LIVE TODAY, SECURE TOMORROW.” Has Been Filed by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York: Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
- Modern Woodmen board selects Shea Doyle as next president and CEO
More Life Insurance News