Kokomo fire union takes city to court in battle over contract negotiations
The step brings to the courts a contentious issue that has festered between city and union officials since negotiations on a new contract began in early June, and represents the most recent chapter in a relationship between
Specifically, court documents filed by the union state that members "would be irreparably harmed if the terms of the current contract are allowed to lapse by the expiration of the contract on
The union also expressed, in court documents, concerns about the possibility of existing health insurance benefits being denied if the existing contract is allowed to expire on its scheduled end date.
A hearing in the case will be held at
"The City has received the union's court filings and is preparing for the hearing on Monday," said Kokomo Corporation Counsel
"Regardless of how these legal proceedings unfold, local residents can be assured they will not see any difference in fire protection in 2018."
Issues between city and union officials first became public on
The grievance, first disclosed by Local 396 President
Notably, the grievance also claimed the city "has refused the Union's submission to arbitration of items at impasse despite past precedent requiring such submission."
That grievance was denied by the
City ordinance lays out a 45-day negotiating window during which arbitration can be requested. The two sides began contract negotiations on
But Frazier believes a previous ruling, made in 2005 in
The union was first informed in an email
"We continued negotiating mutually past the 45 days to try to reach an agreement," said Frazier in an email. "We asked for arbitration as soon as we reached an impasse in negotiations."
Now, the union is requesting that the court mandate city officials to comply with what Local 396 members believe is "mandatory binding arbitration."
Citing
"At no point during the negotiations did the City request Local 396 to waive its right to arbitration," adds the suit. "Further, the course and conduct of the parties demonstrated that the City would continue negotiations and participate in arbitration beyond the timeline recommended in" a city ordinance.
The union, again citing health insurance concerns, also maintains that the city has attempted "to pressure Local 296 into signing an agreement that is preferential to the City and not the firefighters."
In conjunction, the suit references a letter written by Copeland and distributed, in late November, to employees of the
The letter states that once negotiation began "it became apparent there was no real desire on the union's part to reach an agreement."
"The union's initial proposal to the City contained more than 70 total proposals! (In comparison, the FOP proposed fewer than 10 changes to their entire contract.) Moreover, many of the proposals submitted and vigorously fought for involved changes that only affect the President or the executive board," reads Copeland's letter.
The document, which also lays out the city's "last, best and final offer" made to union leadership, expresses the belief that Frazier did not communicate negotiation details with his membership.
"In a final conversation, the terms of this contract settlement opportunity were outright rejected by Union President
"We do not believe the City's final suggested compromise was ever presented to the members for a vote."
The union's suit alleges that the letter contains "numerous false statements and mischaracterizations regarding the negotiations."
A separate letter, distributed by the fire union, was sent to other local union "brothers and sisters" describing the negotiations and contentious impasse.
The union's letter alleges that the city has declared it will not mutually agree to extend the current contact past
It also cites issues related to retirement health insurance for firefighters; "reasonable" health insurance premiums for employees who are not
"All of these anti-labor actions are openly being committed by the city administration and board of public works whose leaders were once union leaders in this community," states the union's letter.
___
(c)2017 the Kokomo Tribune (Kokomo, Ind.)
Visit the Kokomo Tribune (Kokomo, Ind.) at www.kokomotribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



The Latest: California governor: Fires are ‘new normal’
House vs. Senate tax bill: The battles that matter most for New Jersey
Advisor News
- LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
- Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
- Metlife study finds less than half of US workforce holistically healthy
- Invigorating client relationships with AI coaching
- SEC: Get-rich-quick influencer Tai Lopez was running a Ponzi scam
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Trademark Application for “EMPOWER MY WEALTH” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Conning says insurers’ success in 2026 will depend on ‘strategic adaptation’
- The structural rise of structured products
- How next-gen pricing tech can help insurers offer better annuity products
- Continental General Acquires Block of Life Insurance, Annuity and Health Policies from State Guaranty Associations
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- New Managed Care Study Findings Have Been Reported by G. Martin Reinhart and Co-Researchers (Psychiatric Medication Prescribing by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Associates for Medicare Beneficiaries): Managed Care
- Data on Managed Care Reported by Researchers at American Dental Association (Early association of expanded Medicare dental benefits to dentist billing in Medicare): Managed Care
- Researchers to study universal health care, as Coloradans face $1 billion in medical debt
- Veteran speaks out on veterans mail-order drug bill
- National Life Group Selects FINEOS AdminSuite to Transform Living Benefit and Life Insurance Claims Operations
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News