Kokomo fire union takes city to court in battle over contract negotiations
The step brings to the courts a contentious issue that has festered between city and union officials since negotiations on a new contract began in early June, and represents the most recent chapter in a relationship between
Specifically, court documents filed by the union state that members "would be irreparably harmed if the terms of the current contract are allowed to lapse by the expiration of the contract on
The union also expressed, in court documents, concerns about the possibility of existing health insurance benefits being denied if the existing contract is allowed to expire on its scheduled end date.
A hearing in the case will be held at
"The City has received the union's court filings and is preparing for the hearing on Monday," said Kokomo Corporation Counsel
"Regardless of how these legal proceedings unfold, local residents can be assured they will not see any difference in fire protection in 2018."
Issues between city and union officials first became public on
The grievance, first disclosed by Local 396 President
Notably, the grievance also claimed the city "has refused the Union's submission to arbitration of items at impasse despite past precedent requiring such submission."
That grievance was denied by the
City ordinance lays out a 45-day negotiating window during which arbitration can be requested. The two sides began contract negotiations on
But Frazier believes a previous ruling, made in 2005 in
The union was first informed in an email
"We continued negotiating mutually past the 45 days to try to reach an agreement," said Frazier in an email. "We asked for arbitration as soon as we reached an impasse in negotiations."
Now, the union is requesting that the court mandate city officials to comply with what Local 396 members believe is "mandatory binding arbitration."
Citing
"At no point during the negotiations did the City request Local 396 to waive its right to arbitration," adds the suit. "Further, the course and conduct of the parties demonstrated that the City would continue negotiations and participate in arbitration beyond the timeline recommended in" a city ordinance.
The union, again citing health insurance concerns, also maintains that the city has attempted "to pressure Local 296 into signing an agreement that is preferential to the City and not the firefighters."
In conjunction, the suit references a letter written by Copeland and distributed, in late November, to employees of the
The letter states that once negotiation began "it became apparent there was no real desire on the union's part to reach an agreement."
"The union's initial proposal to the City contained more than 70 total proposals! (In comparison, the FOP proposed fewer than 10 changes to their entire contract.) Moreover, many of the proposals submitted and vigorously fought for involved changes that only affect the President or the executive board," reads Copeland's letter.
The document, which also lays out the city's "last, best and final offer" made to union leadership, expresses the belief that Frazier did not communicate negotiation details with his membership.
"In a final conversation, the terms of this contract settlement opportunity were outright rejected by Union President
"We do not believe the City's final suggested compromise was ever presented to the members for a vote."
The union's suit alleges that the letter contains "numerous false statements and mischaracterizations regarding the negotiations."
A separate letter, distributed by the fire union, was sent to other local union "brothers and sisters" describing the negotiations and contentious impasse.
The union's letter alleges that the city has declared it will not mutually agree to extend the current contact past
It also cites issues related to retirement health insurance for firefighters; "reasonable" health insurance premiums for employees who are not
"All of these anti-labor actions are openly being committed by the city administration and board of public works whose leaders were once union leaders in this community," states the union's letter.
___
(c)2017 the Kokomo Tribune (Kokomo, Ind.)
Visit the Kokomo Tribune (Kokomo, Ind.) at www.kokomotribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


The Latest: California governor: Fires are ‘new normal’
House vs. Senate tax bill: The battles that matter most for New Jersey
Advisor News
- Help women break through their retirement roadblocks
- Advisors await SEC decision on Vanguard fair fund distribution
- What to do when adult children become the client
- Judge rules insurers not liable for Newport Group’s AME Church pension lawsuit
- Why vacation homes are becoming a major blind spot for advisors
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Global Life/Annuity Reinsurers Remained Poised for Steady Growth
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
- Legacy Marketing Group® and Malibu Life USA Announce Distribution Partnership for New Fixed Indexed Annuity Platform
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- How advisors can get clients to act sooner on life insurance
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Crum & Forster Insurance Group’s Members and Monitor Life Insurance Company of New York
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Life Insurance Company Centras Life JSC
- AM Best Withdraws Credit Ratings of New Providence Life Insurance Company
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
More Life Insurance News