Judge declines to dismiss lawsuit against New Mexico Medical Insurance Pool
A lawsuit that seeks to shed more light on a health coverage expansion program that would serve undocumented immigrants and other
The suit was filed on behalf of businessman
At issue is whether the insurance pool, which the Legislature established in 1987 to provide health coverage for patients with particularly complex and expensive medical needs, is a public body or a nonprofit.
In a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, attorney
"No Court has ever held that the NMMIP is subject to either the OMA or the IPRA and there exists no basis to do so now," he wrote. "Indeed, while the NMMIP is committed to transparency, its general voluntary compliance with
Padilla did not return a message seeking comment.
The case involves a controversial topic: providing health insurance to undocumented immigrants under a new coverage expansion program administered by the medical insurance pool, as well as a
The coverage expansion program was scheduled to launch in July but was derailed in April amid questions about the organization's status.
The state initially defended the agreement, saying the government-to-government contract was "a permissible contracting and procurement vehicle."
But amid lingering questions, the state abruptly terminated the deal, saying its decision came after learning the insurance pool is neither a governmental nor quasi-governmental agency.
"They got their hands caught in the cookie jar," he said.
The insurance pool's acting executive director is former state Rep.
In an interview in April, Armstrong said the
"We’re a unique organization," she said. "There isn’t anything else quite like it or at all like it, being legislatively created, nonprofit and without hardly anything that would tie us directly to the government. But certainly, they have a governmental interest because they created it legislatively."
Candelaria was skeptical, noting the "governmental services agreement" is between two units of government.
"The lawyers of the pool ... admit that the pool is at the very minimum a quasi-governmental agency so they can enter into this kind of agreement for procurement while at the same time going to court and saying, 'We're not a public body. You can't force IPRA and the OMA,' ” he said.
"So what does the
"Give me a break," Candelaria said. "Really? These are incredibly highly paid state bureaucrats dealing with public procurement in the millions of dollars. ... So that's what's at stake here. Ultimately, it's money."
© 2025 The Santa Fe New Mexican (Santa Fe, N.M.). Visit www.santafenewmexican.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


U.S. Congress tackles homeowner insurance crisis in Florida, beyond
Best Fintech Stocks Worth Watching – June 19th
Advisor News
- Can your advisory firm survive without you?
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Solen Software Group Acquires Cooperative Technologies, Provider of 1035 Exchange and Annuity Replacement Software
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Patients demand access to prescription drugs but need support
- Oscar Health Inc. (NYSE: OSCR) Makes an Unexpected Move During Monday’s Session
- Benefit sustainability, affordability challenge employers
- Transparent Medicare Advantage guidance: Putting consumers first
- Legislators hear report on thin hospital margins, advance prior authorization reform
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News