ISAKSON, SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESS ADMINISTRATION ON ACCESS TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
Isakson and several senators sent a letter to
A new "standard option" regulating federal Obamacare exchanges means that healthcare plans that qualify for health savings accounts, known as HSAs, will not be able to comply with the requirements. That will limit choice and access to popular HSAs that allow consumers to save tax-free for their health care expenses.
HSAs are a popular choice for consumers because they are tax-deductible, allow for tax-free employer contributions, and tax-free interest accrued. This tax-free savings option is especially important for workers and families who have to pay the high deductibles required by many Obamacare plans.
"Your agency took another step to potentially limit the utilization of HSA-eligible plans on the federally-facilitated exchanges (FFEs) by developing a 'standard option' for the 2017 plan year that imposes additional requirements on plans," the senators wrote. "For a plan to meet the qualifications of one of the 'standard options,' it must conform to a uniform set of features related to deductibles, out-of-pocket limits, co-payments and coinsurance levels, and it must have a single provider tier."
Currently, healthcare plans that qualify for HSAs will not meet the qualifications for the six uniform set of features under Obamacare's new "standard option" meaning that this type of consumer-driven option could be suppressed as individuals and families shop for health insurance coverage.
The senators noted that the plan would prevent an HSA from feasibly meeting these new requirements and asked CMS to explain what steps were taken to draft the requirements for the standardized option and to provide information on the number of individuals who are currently enrolled in HSA health plans on the federal exchanges and would lose their plan due to the "standard option." This is yet another example of how Obamacare has limited the ability for consumers to make their own choices when it comes to their health plans.
"Under current law, the very requirements to qualify as an HSA will in turn preclude an HSA from meeting the requirements on the new 'standard option' and limit consumers' exposure to and choice of popular, consumer-driven health coverage," the senators continued. "It is clear to see the potential disruption in consumer choice by creating the 'standard option' and limiting the types of plans that qualify for it to exclude HSAs."
In addition to Isakson the letter also was signed by:
The text of the letter is below, and a signed copy can be found here http://www.finance.senate.gov/download/senate-republicans-press-administration-on-impact-of-latest-effort-to-limit-health-savings-accounts.
Mr. Andy Slavitt
Acting Administrator
Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:
As health care costs continue to grow, despite the promises made by the
The ACA made a number of changes to HSAs that limit their assistance to consumers and raise taxes, including narrowing the definition of what is considered a qualified medical expense by excluding over-the-counter drugs, and by doubling the penalties on the use of HSA funds for non-qualified medical expenses.
Recently, your agency took another step to potentially limit the utilization of HSA-eligible plans on the federally-facilitated exchanges (FFEs) by developing a "standard option" for the 2017 plan year that imposes additional requirements on plans. For a plan to meet the qualifications of one of the "standard options," it must conform to a uniform set of features related to deductibles, out-of-pocket limits, co-payments and coinsurance levels, and it must have a single provider tier. Furthermore, first-dollar coverage must apply to specific services, and plans must have an actuarial value that complies with each metal level and takes into account cost-sharing subsidies. Under current law, the very requirements to qualify as an HSA will in turn preclude an HSA from meeting the requirements on the new "standard option" and limit consumers' exposure to and choice of popular, consumer-driven health coverage.
According to a memo from the
1. A minimum deductible must be met each year. For 2016, the minimum deductible is
2. The plan must limit out-of-pocket expenses for covered benefits each year. For 2016, the out-of-pocket limit is
3. The only benefits that can be covered prior to the deductible being met are for preventive care.
The "standard option" deductible and out-of-pocket limit often contradict the requirements to be considered an HSA, and the requirements of first dollar coverage for non-preventive services eliminates HSAs entirely from this category.
It is clear to see the potential disruption in consumer choice by creating the "standard option" and limiting the types of plans that qualify for it to exclude HSAs, given the likely number of HSA-qualified health plans in the FFEs. Since the ACA was predicated on creating greater access, choice, and reduced health care costs, we request answers to the following questions regarding HSAs and the "standard option:"
1. How many individuals are currently enrolled in an HSA-qualified health plan on the federally-facilitated exchanges?
1. What consideration was given to the statutory requirements for HSAs when debating and discussing the merits of creating a "standard option" to compare plans in the FFEs?
1. Was the
1. Did your agency conduct an analysis or estimate the number and types of plans expected to participate in the "standard option" in 2016, and how many qualified health plans offered on the FFE in 2016, would be excluded from participating based on the new requirements? If yes, provide the estimates and analysis.
Please provide complete responses to the above questions no later than
Read this original document at: http://www.isakson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/news-releases?ID=A1C6F102-842B-4DEF-A067-C0103F1971AC


Manchin, Murray and Wyden Call for Action on Miner’s Pensions
Advisor News
- Succession planning: Building the future of your practice
- From loss to security: Supporting widowed clients with life insurance
- Plan now for lower Social Security benefits later
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Record IUL sales don’t diminish the need for continued customer engagement
- Benchmark International Successfully Facilitated the Transaction Between National Group Marketing Trust and New Era Life Insurance Companies
- Why the bond market is flexing its muscles, and why everyone needs to care
- An Application for the Trademark “LIVE TODAY, SECURE TOMORROW.” Has Been Filed by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York: Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
- Modern Woodmen board selects Shea Doyle as next president and CEO
More Life Insurance News