Insurers said they won’t eliminate water damage coverage when taking out Citizens policies this fall
A
In a phone call with a Citizens executive last week and in emails sent to insurance agents on Monday,
On Monday, Slide sent an email to insurance agents with links to “updated and revised talking points specifically tailored for” its October and November takeouts. Links in the email take users to a coverage worksheet stating that limited water damage coverage is provided for all dwellings, regardless of age.
The announcements followed a discussion during a Citizens advisory board meeting in September about companies that provide lesser — or no — non-weather-related water damage coverage compared to policies the companies obtain through Citizens’ depopulation program.
Unlike hurricane coverage for water damage caused by wind-driven breaches of homes, non-weather-related coverage pays out when damage results from malfunctions of hot water heaters, dishwashers, washing machines, or plumbing inside homes.
Slide’s announcement also followed the addition by the
Slide, formed in 2022, took out far more Citizens policies than any of the other 21 companies participating in the depopulation program in 2023 and 2024. Through June, Slide took out 147,366 policies — or 36.1% of the 407,769 personal residential policies removed by all insurers. How many of the policies Slide took out covered homes more than 40 years old is unknown.
According to the
Last year, Slide sent hundreds of renewal offers to takeout targets that proposed raising premiums averaging 40% to 832% higher than Citizens’ premiums.
That prompted the
Citizens stepped in after Slide directed the company to send 258,656 letters when it was approved to take out 100,000 Citizens customers in
Non-weather water damage coverage vs. hurricane coverage
Citizens caps non-weather-related water coverage at
Only a handful of insurers also operate managed repair programs. A majority of others limit non-weather water damage coverage to
In late September, a Slide spokesman acknowledged to the
In July, an agent sent to the
The Slide spokesman said his company wasn’t the only insurer participating in Citizens’ depopulation program that eliminated water coverage.
Reducing coverage ‘puts me in the hot seat’
Hodgers didn’t reveal names of the companies during the meeting, but in an interview with the
“As an agent, I’m not pleased to be dealing with these types of things,” Hodgers told the
Clients, he said, “are going to say, ‘Well, wait a minute. When I wrote that policy with you five years ago, you said I had unlimited water (coverage).'”
Responding during the advisory board meeting to Hodgers’ complaint,
The language also stated that insurers cannot require customers to pay additional premiums to get coverage comparable to what they were purchasing from Citizens.
That point is notable because a new state law bars any Citizens customer selected for takeout by one or more private market companies from remaining with Citizens if any of the companies provide an estimated policy renewal cost that comes within 20% of Citizens’ estimated renewal cost.
Because they eliminate a costly coverage element, renewal estimates for policies without non-weather water coverage would be more likely to fall within 20% of Citizens’ estimated renewal cost, increasing the likelihood that the policyholder could not return to Citizens.
Officials with Citizens and the
In an email on
According to an internal Citizens email provided to the
The CEO of
Marmelstein wrote in the email that he contacted both companies because their coverage comparison worksheets, which are posted on a depopulation page on Citizens’ website, indicated they eliminated non-weather water coverage for homes taken out of Citizens.
The CEOs of both companies, Marmelstein wrote in the email, said the language in their coverage worksheets reflected what they were approved by the
Monarch took out 36,900 policies through June and has been approved to take out 55,000 in October and November.
Asked by the
Slide and Monarch have not yet responded to a follow-up question asking whether policies taken out in 2023 or 2024 excluded non-weather water damage coverage, and if so, whether the coverage will be added back to those policies.
Monarch and three other companies — American Traditions,
American Traditions, which took out 5,787 policies last December and March, and Trident, a new company approved to take out 16,035 policies in November, did not respond to questions about their water damage coverage. Citizens did not immediately respond when asked if American Traditions and Trident were also questioned by Marmelstein about whether they are offering non-weather water coverage to takeout customers this fall.
Agent: Companies want to reduce water coverage
The coverage comparison sheets on Citizens’ website are also sent to customers with notices that their policies have been selected for takeout. Customers receive comparison sheets for companies that selected their policies, but Hodgers said he suspects that few read them.
“There’s no way they’re reading these things,” Hodgers said. “So it’s going to be a surprise when they get that water limit on that unfateful day when they put in a claim.”
Longtime South Florida insurance agent
Norberg, however, said that some private companies balance out limiting water coverage because their policies offer coverage levels that Citizens doesn’t provide. Examples include increased coverage for personal liability, which Citizens limits to
Norberg said insurers typically want to reduce non-weather water damage coverage when they can because in-home water breaches trigger the most common claims “especially in older homes that are prone to those types of things.”
Inflated water damage claims, in fact, touched off the current insurance cost crisis well before hurricanes Irma, Michael and Ian helped drive 10 Florida-based insurers into insolvency between 2019 and 2023.
As early as 2015, Citizens blamed increasing losses on costs of litigation that arose out of what it called fraudulent non-weather claims.
Contractors, plumbers and plaintiff attorneys, the company said, worked together to persuade homeowners to sign over the right to pursue their insurance claims. When insurers were notified of the claim, contractors had already gutted the room where the leak occurred and attorneys were quick to file lawsuits when insurers denied or underpaid the claim.
Citizens fought back in 2016 by capping emergency repairs at
Once again, insurers lined up for approval to impose their own
Later reforms limited assignments of benefits and barred plaintiffs attorneys from charging insurers for their legal fees when insurers agree to pay any amount over their initial claim settlement offer.
©2024 South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Visit sun-sentinel.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Wells Fargo Reports Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results
BC3 breast cancer survivors stress importance of self-examinations
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News